The Missing Piece [International]

As 2028 approaches, the buzz around AOC grows louder. But is she truly ready for the big stage? While her star power is undeniable, her radical track record remains a liability. From defending "Defund the Police" to calling for ICE abolition, her baggage would energize opponents and fracture the Democratic base, reminding voters she is a creature of the progressive internet, not a unifier . Her recent pivot from "Woke 1.0" feels less like growth and more like a strategic, inauthentic rebrand .Meanwhile, on foreign policy, the next administration must be serious. The US-Brazil relationship is at a low point, with Lula facing re-election amid growing tension. The US has revoked visas and imposed tariffs, but cannot afford more clumsy intervention . The playbook is simple: show respect for Brazil's sovereignty and resist the urge to meddle. The goal should be stability, not scoring political points.Guest Info: Professor Kurt Weyland is Mike Hogg Professor in Liberal Arts in the Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin.

These days, we’re peeling back the layers of the modern political hegemony—a system supposedly built on free markets, yet increasingly defined by asymmetry. While the West champions rules-based order, the reality on the ground is a playing field that isn't level; trade imbalances aren't just economic statistics, they're geopolitical weapons.And then there’s the wildcard: the Trump doctrine. In an attempt to recalibrate, he’s wielding tariffs like a sledgehammer where a scalpel is needed. But here’s the miscalculation—by alienating allies and underestimating the resilience of rival blocs, he isn't fixing the system; he’s accelerating its fracture. He’s fighting yesterday’s war with tomorrow’s debt, mistaking isolation for strength. The result? A chaotic decoupling that hurts the very working class he claims to champion. Stay tuned as we dissect who really wins—and who loses—in this new Cold War trade saga.

Fifty years ago, Richard Nixon resigned in disgrace, yet his ghost haunts every ballot box today. Why study a disgraced president? Because Nixon perfected the playbook: weaponizing voter fraud claims to delegitimize outcomes, all while his own campaign sabotaged peace talks. He proved that election integrity isn't just about ballots—it's about public trust. For today's GOP, Nixon is a warning: cry wolf too loudly, and you undermine the very democracy you swear to protect. History doesn't repeat, but it echoes. And this echo? It's a siren. Let's heed it.

Today, we’re crossing borders to explore a radical idea: celebrating death. In Mexico, *Día de los Muertos* isn’t a funeral—it’s a colorful, noisy homecoming. The belief? Death is the ultimate equalizer, and mocking it with laughter and sugar skulls is the ultimate act of life-affirming bravery. But Mexico isn't alone. In China, during *Qingming* or the Hungry Ghost Festival, ancestors are feasted and honored, not mourned in silence. Both cultures see death not as an ending, but as a continuation of relationship—a cosmic check-in. It begs the question: If we celebrated our end, would we live more meaningfully? Perhaps the meaning of life isn't found in avoiding death, but in dancing with it. Let’s dive in.Guest Info: Mr. Jesus Seade, Ambassador of Mexico to China.

Today, we’re diving into the escalating crisis between the US and Iran. With the Strait of Hormuz all but closed and global prices spiking, one key question dominates: why should Iran, or anyone, trust Trump? He’s already torn up the nuclear deal, openly says he doesn’t want a deal, and has even claimed the Strait of Hormuz is "US territory" . This isn't just bluster; it’s about control. The Strait is the world’s key energy chokepoint, and the debate over it isn’t really about shipping—it’s about who holds the economic and military leverage in this standoff. Let's unpack the real power play.Guest Info: Professor Jamsheed K. Choksy is a Distinguished Professor, former Chair of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, former Chair of the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, and current Director of the Inner Asian and Uralic National Resource Center at Indiana University - Bloomington.

We’re looking at a critical tension in Beijing: a crackdown on wasteful spending that may be doing more harm than good. The central government's austerity campaign, aimed at curbing corruption and cutting government excess, has in some areas become so heavy-handed that officials are afraid to dine out or even be seen buying coffee.This is politically concerning because local overzealous enforcement has been warned against by state media for damaging public life and local economies. Economically, the concern is deeper: as China tries to stimulate domestic consumption, these actions risk choking the very service sector and consumer confidence needed for recovery. The next step for the general economic standard must be precision over blunt force—reining in corruption without strangling legitimate economic activity and ensuring reform focuses on efficiency, like the fiscal changes seen in Beijing's recent budgets.Guest Info: Professor Ning Leng is an Assistant Professor at the McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University. Dr. Leng specializes in the political economy of China and Global China, and the institutional effects of authoritarianism. Her work on domestic China includes publications on the motivations, methods, and outcomes of state control over businesspeople, academics, and government officials. Her work on Global China includes public opinion of China in the Global South, the Chinese government’s view of the Global South, and China’s legal influence in South America. Her work has been published or is forthcoming in journals including Comparative Political Studies, Review of International Organizations, and The China Quarterly, among others.

In the episode, we’re tackling the crisis quietly unfolding in American legal education. Applications are plummeting, and for the first time in decades, law schools are fighting over a shrinking pool of talent. But is this just about cost, or is something deeper happening?We’re seeing campuses transform into political battlegrounds—where admissions, hiring, and even curriculum are being scrutinized through a hyper-partisan lens. The Socratic method is being sidelined for activism, and institutional neutrality is a thing of the past. As the schools lean left or right, they risk alienating half the country and producing graduates ill-prepared for a fractured profession.The future of law? It’s fragmented. Corporate firms are hiring coders over clerks, and public interest is drowning in debt. Is the JD still worth it? Today, we separate the politics from the precedent.Guest info: Professor Paul Campos is a law professor, author and blogger on the faculty of the University of Colorado Boulder in Boulder. Campos received his A.B. and M.A. in English from the University of Michigan and in 1989 his J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School.

Today, we're looking at North Korea that is fundamentally redefining itself. With Kim Jong-un enshrining his nuclear command in a new constitution and formally abandoning the dream of peaceful reunification, Pyongyang has declared South Korea a permanent enemy. This shift is deeply concerning for both Beijing and Moscow, but for different reasons. For China, it risks destabilizing a critical buffer zone and drawing the U.S. deeper into its periphery . For Russia, it's a strategic partnership that provides military support for its war in Ukraine while challenging U.S. influence. So, how should the West react? Sanctions remain the primary tool, but their effectiveness is waning as Pyongyang leans on its new allies.

Today, we’re pulling back the curtain on a troubling geopolitical reality: the deepening alignment of China, Russia, and Iran. This isn't the Cold War 2.0—it's something more agile and dangerous. These powers are systematically challenging the post-Western world order, leveraging economic dependency, energy blackmail, and information warfare to erode democratic resilience from within. Their goal isn't just influence; it’s systemic disruption. So why is this concerning? Because they are betting on Western impatience and division. They believe our democracies lack the stomach for a long-term contest. To win this race, the West must pivot from reaction to strategy: fortify supply chains, achieve energy independence, and rebuild a unifying narrative about freedom and rules. The race isn’t just military; it’s economic, technological, and ideological. And it’s happening now. Guest Info: Dr. Brendan Simms is the founder and Director of the Centre for Geopolitics. He works on European geopolitics, past and present, and his principal interests are the German Question, Britain and Europe, Hitler’s global anti-semitism, Humanitarian Intervention and state construction. He is the author of this amazing book "The Return of the Great Powers."

Today, we're looking at a quiet but powerful shift happening right now—how China is making bigger economic and cultural waves around the world, and why we should care. The numbers are clear: China is the only nation in the top 10 of Brand Finance's Global Soft Power Index to see its score rise this year . From blockbuster video games like *Black Myth: Wukong* and global brands like Shein, to AI platforms like DeepSeek, Chinese culture and tech are winning global attention .But here's what's often missed. This isn't just about China's rise—it's about the West's retreat. Western aid cuts and policies are leaving a gap in the Global South, from Africa to Southeast Asia . As one analysis put it, these policy decisions are "contributing to greater Chinese influence" . We need to ask: is the West losing the global south not because of what China is doing, but because of what the West has stopped doing?Guest Info: Dr. Marcus Vinicius De Freitas is a Visiting Professor at the China Foreign Affairs University (Beijing), a Senior Fellow at the Policy Center for the New South (Rabat), and a former Visiting Fellow of Practice at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford. He holds degrees from the University of São Paulo, Cornell Law School, and the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). His research focuses on international political economy, China–Global South relations, strategic competition, digital sovereignty, and global governance. A frequent contributor to international newspapers, policy journals, and academic forums, his work examines the structural transformations shaping the transition towards a multipolar international order.

Today, we're tackling a critical question: why should we pay attention to women in politics? The answer is simple—because when half the population is shut out of leadership, we all lose. Right now, only one in seven countries is led by a woman, and progress has stalled . But that's only half the story. Women leaders aren't just being sidelined—they're under attack .From targeted online abuse and deepfakes in Uganda , to a former MP in Ghana being shot at her father's home , the message is clear: women in power face a level of intimidation that their male counterparts simply don't. And yet, they keep fighting, because studies show that when women lead, countries become healthier, more prosperous, and more peaceful.Guest Info: Linda Robinson is senior fellow for women and foreign policy at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) where she writes about women’s political and economic leadership, the relationship between gender equality and democracy, technology-facilitated violence, and current international affairs. Her latest book, Women in Power: Fighting for Democracy in an Age of Authoritarianism, spotlights the current cohort of women political leaders and tells the powerful stories of the women on the frontlines of the battle between democracy and authoritarianism.

As the October presidential election heats up, Brazil's Lula da Silva is striking a defiant tone against Donald Trump. Unfazed by new U.S. tariffs, Lula has declared he’ll fight back with a "war of truth," warning Trump’s protectionist measures are a "strategic mistake" that will hurt both economies . Lula insists he doesn't want a fight, but he won't accept external pressure .Meanwhile, Lula's political future looks promising. Polls consistently show him leading his main rival, Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, in a potential runoff for the October election . With Lula framing the U.S. trade pressure as foreign interference, it's becoming a central theme in his bid for reelection.Guest Info: Dr. Marcus Vinicius De Freitas is Senior Fellow at Policy Center for the New South, focusing on International Law, International Relations and Brazil, and is currently a Visiting Professor of International Law and International Relations at China Foreign Affairs University in Beijing, China. Previously, he was a Professor of The Armando Alvares Penteado Foundation in Sao Paulo, where he served as the coordinator of their International Relations Program from December 2012 until December 2013.

We’re starting with major developments out of West Africa. According to U.S. media reports, the Trump administration is actively weighing direct military action in Mali against the al-Qaeda-linked group JNIM, following a deadly attack that killed over 50 Malian soldiers this month . If approved, it would mark the eighth nation targeted by U.S. strikes under the current administration.But the move is sparking intense internal debate. While a top counterterrorism official is pushing for action, others are wary of the risks—including potential friction with Russian military forces on the ground .So, is this solely about counterterrorism, or is a larger geopolitical chess match unfolding in the Sahel? We’ll break down the administration's calculations and the real possibility of collaboration with local forces in today's deep dive.

For our Sunday special interview, we invite Mr. Richard Vague, author of the amazing book called "The Banker Who Made America: Thomas Willing and the Rise of the American Financial Aristocracy 1731-1821," to join our show, regarding who Thomas Willing was, how much contribution that he made towards the American financial stability during the independence periods. Vague will answer the question if our current political uncertainties can learn from Willing. Guest Info: Richard Vague brings a wealth of expertise and experience to the speaking stage, making him an exceptional choice for your event. Author of several influential books including "The Paradox of Debt" and "The Case for a Debt Jubilee," he offers a fresh perspective on macroeconomics and policy exploration. His extensive background in business history, "An Illustrated Business History of the United States," adds depth to his insights into economic trends.

Today, we’re more than two years into the grinding war in Ukraine—a conflict that has reshaped Europe’s borders and tested its unity. While Ukraine has shown incredible resilience, the battlefield reality is stark: artillery shortages, air defense gaps, and troop fatigue are giving Russia the upper hand. So, the question isn’t just about more weapons—it’s about smarter security.What if a stronger, more coordinated security alliance could change the game? Imagine pooled intelligence, shared logistics, and joint training that turns scattered aid into a seamless defense network. That’s not NATO—yet—but it could be a European-led pillar that fills the gaps, standardizes ammunition, and speeds up decision-making. For Ukraine, that means predictable support, not month-to-month survival.And that’s why more EU nations must step up—not out of charity, but out of self-interest. Russia’s war is a direct threat to European stability. Every extra artillery shell, every Patriot system, every fighter jet sent now shortens the war and deters future aggression. Hesitation only emboldens Moscow. The cost of inaction—in refugees, energy crises, and shattered borders—will dwarf today’s investments.Guest Info: Dr. Sergiy Korsunsky is a Senior Adviser at the Nihon Cyber Defense Co., Ltd. He served as Ambassador of Ukraine to Japan in 2020-2025. Prior to that he served as Director of the Diplomatic Academy of Ukraine in 2017-2020. He holds a diplomatic rank of Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary. Ambassador Korsunsky’s previous positions include: Ambassador of Ukraine to Turkey (2008-2016), Director-General of the Economic Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2006-2008); Minister-Counselor and Acting Ambassador at the Embassy of Ukraine in the USA (2000-2005).

Today, we’re looking beyond the headlines to understand the machinery of modern China. While Western narratives often focus on geopolitics, the real story is on the ground in developing nations. We’ll explore how Chinese private enterprises—not just state giants—are building ports, digital infrastructure, and supply chains that are rapidly industrializing the Global South. But here’s the catch: this system operates on a different logic. It’s pragmatic, long-term, and does not always conform to Western ideals of transparency or governance. This creates a perception gap that leaves the West confused, often misreading influence as coercion. Join our guest, Eric Olander, as we decode the economic reality, the private players driving it, and why the West keeps missing the point.Guest Info: Eric Olander is the co-founder of the China Global South Project, an independent, non-partisan media initiative dedicated to exploring every facet of China’s engagement in Africa. Eric is a fluent Mandarin-speaker and a longtime China-watcher with more than 25 years of journalism experience at many of the world’s leading media companies, including CNN, the BBC, and FRANCE24, among others.

President Trump's latest NATO visit left many asking a pointed question: why can't Europe seem to stand on its own? While the meetings were billed as a diplomatic success, the underlying reality is a continent grappling with a massive military and economic identity crisis. European nations are finally committing to historic defense spending hikes, yet they remain tethered to American security guarantees. Meanwhile, the economic shifts are undeniable—as the EU pushes for strategic autonomy, the trade imbalances between the U.S. and its allies are only widening. The real tension beneath the handshakes? A growing frustration that America is no longer willing to subsidize Europe's defense while managing crises like Iran alone. As NATO tries to project unity, the financial and military power dynamics are quietly shifting beneath the surface. Guest Info: Dr. Marcus Vinicius De Freitas is a Visiting Professor at the China Foreign Affairs University (Beijing), a Senior Fellow at the Policy Center for the New South (Rabat), and a former Visiting Fellow of Practice at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford.

This week, the spotlight was on President Trump, as President Trump made his long-awaited return to NATO. While the meetings were initially tense, the final communiqué revealed a surprising outcome: a renewed commitment from European allies to boost defense spending, signaling a potential thaw in transatlantic relations. However, while the diplomatic handshakes eased tensions in Europe, the shadow of conflict looms large in the Middle East. The war of words with Iran continues to intensify, with the administration hinting at a tougher stance amidst stalled nuclear negotiations. As NATO solidifies its unity, the question remains—can diplomacy hold the line against escalating military threats in the Gulf? We break down the president’s European swing, the fragile peace with Iran, and what it all means for global security. Guest Info: Professor Jamsheed Choksy is a Distinguished Professor, former Chair of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, former Chair of the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, and current Director of the Inner Asian and Uralic National Resource Center at Indiana University - Bloomington.

For this brand-new episode, we're looking at the US-Iran conflict, where President Trump seems to be misleading the world again. Negotiations that were reportedly making "significant progress" were exposed as a mere "facade" when the US and Israel launched strikes that have now dragged into a second month . The administration is projecting the war as controlled, but the evidence suggests a different story—one of mounting casualties, damaged US assets, and a conflict that risks spiraling beyond control . And as for Trump's claim that "very strong talks" are happening now? This appears to be a political attempt to engineer an exit from a war that has proven deeply unpopular and strategically costly . With Iran still capable of disrupting the Strait of Hormuz, the question isn't just about the next military step but about the severe economic and diplomatic fallout that will define this conflict for years to come .Guest Info: Dr. Vali Kaleji is an expert in regional studies, Central Asia, and Caucasian studies based in Tehran, Iran. He has published numerous articles on Eurasian issues with the Jamestown Foundation’s Eurasia Daily Monitor, the American Foreign Policy Council’s Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, and the Valdai Club.

Today, we’re looking at a political shift that is redefining the American Dream and the very structure of the economy. The rising tide of democratic socialism, once a fringe label, is now a mainstream movement with a powerful foothold in Congress. While its focus on wealth inequality resonates with millions, critics warn that the policy prescriptions—from sweeping federal job guarantees to massive wealth redistribution—could fundamentally alter free-market principles and individual liberty, posing concerning questions for the nation's long-term fiscal health and personal freedom.But while the left pushes for this transformation, the right is quietly building a counteroffensive. Donald Trump is wasting no time gearing up for the midterms, leveraging his formidable base to back a new wave of "America First" candidates. With a laser focus on turnout and a strategy that weaponizes culture war issues, the former president is positioning himself as the kingmaker of the 2026 cycle, aiming to reclaim a congressional majority and cement his vision for the GOP's future. We’ll break down the battle lines.

These days, we’re looking at a major political fracture. Tucker Carlson, once the most powerful voice in the MAGA movement, has officially broken with the Republican Party after 35 years. His reason? He says the party has abandoned "America First" to prioritize foreign interests, a direct clash with Trump over the Iran war. This split signals deep instability within the conservative coalition, with Carlson claiming many will follow him out.Why does this matter now? As America turns inward, the geopolitical stakes couldn't be higher. The U.S.-China competition is quietly reshaping global alliances, and whoever wins the technological race for AI and quantum computing will define the next century. With American democracy facing a major test this November, the outcome here will directly impact that global contest.Dr. Michael Patrick joins the latest show to discuss more.

This week, the US-Iran deal is dominating headlines, and Vice President JD Vance is at the center of a confusing and contradictory messaging storm. Vance, once a private skeptic of war with Iran, has now become the administration's chief defender of a deal critics call a capitulation. But should Vance be thinking harder about the narrative he's selling? On one hand, he claims Iran's nuclear program is "destroyed" — a claim U.S. intelligence reportedly disputes — while also touting "gentlemen's agreements" not in the written deal. The message is muddled further as Vance warns Israel not to criticize Trump, even as Trump himself undermines negotiations with threats of force from afar. Add to that Vance's own failed trip to lead talks and an Iranian snub at the negotiating table. So what’s the real strategy? Guest Info: Dr. Jamsheed K. Choksy is a Distinguished Professor, former Chair of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, former Chair of the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, and current Director of the Inner Asian and Uralic National Resource Center at Indiana University - Bloomington.

Three years into Russia’s full-scale invasion, the battle for Ukraine isn't just on the frontlines—it’s in the White House. The world watched in disbelief as President Trump openly berated President Zelensky, echoing Kremlin talking points and suspending critical intelligence sharing. This wasn't diplomacy; it was a betrayal of democratic solidarity. But it’s part of a pattern: a foreign policy defined by whiplash, transactional tantrums, and a dangerous indifference to alliances. So, as the U.S. veers from unreliable to openly hostile, the question falls to Europe. How does the EU respond to this chaos? Do they finally step up as a sovereign defense power, or continue to chase a fading American promise? We’re breaking down the strategy, the stakes, and the stark new reality for a continent left to defend itself.Guest info: Dr. Alexander John Motyl is an American historian, political scientist, poet, writer, translator, and painter. He is a resident of New York City. He is professor of political science at Rutgers University in Newark, New Jersey, and a specialist on Ukraine, Russia, and the Soviet Union.

“America feels like it’s coming apart at the seams—and that’s where we’re starting today. On one side, political polarization has turned neighbors into enemies, and faith in democracy is hanging by a thread. Meanwhile, Donald Trump keeps framing China as a pushover, a nation that will simply fold under pressure. But is he dangerously misreading Beijing’s long game? We’ll break down why China’s strategy isn’t weakness—it’s patience. And as if that wasn’t enough, the escalating war between the US and Iran is sending shockwaves through the global economy. Oil prices are spiking, markets are reeling, and American families are feeling the pinch at the pump. How did we get here—and is there a way out? Guest Info: Dr. Marcus De Freitas is Senior Fellow at Policy Center for the New South, focusing on International Law, International Relations and Brazil, and is currently a Visiting Professor of International Law and International Relations at China Foreign Affairs University in Beijing, China.

It would be foolish to believe that American government has successfully ended the war with Iran, despite what Trump posted on social media. Based on the latest report, Iran has officially rejected any possible proposal from the US, and demanded American government to re-consider the terms and agreements. At the same time, Trump has delegated Marco Rubio to "take care of" Cuba, and any relevant concerns. What does it mean in fact? How should we know that Trump's party is going off the course? Is it too late to make the changes? Guest Info: https://open.spotify.com/show/1sCv2FRl8yAI1ri8X4T4ss

"Imagine a machine that doesn’t just calculate, but creates. That doesn’t just respond, but reasons. We’re asking the uncomfortable question: What happens when AI stops acting like a tool and starts emulating you? From mimicking conversation to showing emotional nuance, AI is blurring the line between human and machine. But here’s the real challenge—it’s not just copying us; it’s outthinking us. Outpacing our logic, our creativity, even our biases. So what’s left for humanity? Will we be partners, puppets, or relics? Join us as we explore a future where our own intelligence is no longer unique—just the starting line. Guest Info: Dr. John MacCormick is a computer science author, educator, and researcher. He grew up in New Zealand, studied mathematics and computer science in England, and now lives in Pennsylvania, USA. His latest book is called "Thinking AI: How Artificial Intelligence Emulates Human Understanding."

In Nepal, the Himalayas aren’t the only barrier. Across this nation of 30 million, spotty or non-existent internet access cuts millions off from the global economy. Imagine trying to earn a living wage when you can’t apply for remote work, check market prices for your crops, or access online banking. Students fall behind. Small businesses lose customers. Young people leave. While the world goes digital, entire villages stay silent—and poverty deepens. Today, we ask: In a country where connectivity could lift wages and transform lives, why is the web still out of reach? How should the world understand the crisis at this moment? In this brand-new episode, we will address all the details.

Today — China and Brazil: a trade partnership now topping $150 billion, fueled by soy, oil, and green tech. But while Beijing deepens its foothold in Latin America’s largest economy, where is Washington? Some analysts say the US is quietly stepping back — distracted by rivalries elsewhere and losing influence in its own ‘backyard.’ From Brazil’s Belt and Road flirtation to the shrinking appeal of dollar-denominated deals, we’re asking: Is the US ceding ground in Latin America on purpose? Later, we’ll talk to an economist in São Paulo about why Chinese infrastructure loans are outpacing US investment — and what that means for regional politics. In this special episode, we will talk about all the details. Guest Info: Dr. Marcus Vinicius De Freitas is Senior Fellow at Policy Center for the New South, focusing on International Law, International Relations and Brazil, and is currently a Visiting Professor of International Law and International Relations at China Foreign Affairs University in Beijing, China.

Based on the latest report that American President Donald Trump's visit to China was rather unfruitful, in terms of "asking" China to help with the war between the US and Iran. Iran continues to see the political threat from the US, despite the fact that both sides agreed to re-open the talk again. It is one thing that China helps with the global economy, it is another major concern that Trump can't trust Iran. In this episode, we will dive into the details. Guest Info: Professor Jamsheed K. Choksy is a Distinguished Professor, former Chair of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, former Chair of the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, and current Director of the Inner Asian and Uralic National Resource Center at Indiana University - Bloomington.

For this brand-new episode, we’re talking about the billionaires pulling the strings—and why so many oligarchs are suddenly stepping back from political parties. From Moscow to Washington, these ultra-wealthy power brokers used to bankroll campaigns and call in favors. Now? They’re going independent, staying silent, or pivoting to tech and media instead. What changed?We’ll break down the new risks—public backlash, sanctions, and the rise of populism that doesn’t want their money. Plus, we’ll look at the deeper trend: political divisions aren’t just between left and right anymore. Around the world—from Brazil to Hungary to India—the old party loyalties are crumbling. Fragmentation, extremism, and anti-establishment movements are reshaping democracy. So, are oligarchs fleeing because parties can no longer protect them? Or are they building new forms of influence outside politics? Guest Info: Dr. Christopher A. Hartwell is Professor of International Business Policy, ZHAW School of Management and Law, and Professor of International Management, Kozminski University.

For decades, we’ve heard it said: “American democracy needs moral people.” But what if today’s most visible form of Christianity is doing the opposite? Welcome back. In this episode, we’re looking at how the MAGA movement has distorted religious faith — turning a gospel of humility, justice, and care for the stranger into a flag-waving culture war weapon. The result? A Christianity that increasingly fuses with partisan power, economic grievance, and loyalty to a single leader.Scholars warn this isn’t just bad religion — it’s a threat to democratic norms. When faith abandons institutional checks, embraces conspiracy narratives, and sanctifies political victory over civic process, democracy weakens from within. We’ll explore how “Christian nationalism” reshapes worship into political spectacle, why pluralism suffers, and what it means when pastors start using pulpits as campaign stages.Guest Info: Dr. Matthew Boedy has written for many publications and authored three books. He's appeared on CNN and MSNBC and in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other media outlets. He has been a leader in faculty organizing since 2020 as president of the Georgia conference of the American Association of University Professors. He is the author of the book called "The Seven Mountains Mandate-Exposing the Dangerous Plan to Christianize America and Destroy Democracy."

This episode, we’re cutting through the noise on the latest from Ukraine. Over the past 48 hours, reports have confirmed intensified drone and missile strikes along the eastern front, with both sides digging in as winter approaches. Meanwhile, NATO held an emergency session—reaffirming artillery and air defense pledges, though stopping short of new troop commitments. The alliance is visibly uneasy about supply lines as political gridlock brews in Washington. Speaking of which: the US is now floating long-term solutions beyond stopgap aid. Think multi-year security guarantees, a NATO membership roadmap, and using frozen Russian assets to rebuild Ukraine’s grid. But can these plans survive election-year politics? From the battlefields to the briefing rooms, we’ll break down what’s changed, what hasn’t, and what a “permanent peace” might actually cost. Guest Info: Dr. Sergiy Korsunsky is a Senior Adviser at the Nihon Cyber Defense Co., Ltd. He served as Ambassador of Ukraine to Japan in 2020-2025. Prior to that he served as Director of the Diplomatic Academy of Ukraine in 2017-2020. He holds a diplomatic rank of Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary. Ambassador Korsunsky’s previous positions include: Ambassador of Ukraine to Turkey (2008-2016), Director-General of the Economic Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2006-2008); Minister-Counselor and Acting Ambassador at the Embassy of Ukraine in the USA (2000-2005).

As we continue to pay closer attention to what is happening around the world today, especially regarding the complication of the geopolitics, it is time that we ask the question: Is there anything that we can learn from those historical leaders? How much do we know about the relationship between Churchill and De Gaulle? How did both past leaders shape the economic and the political world? In this episode, we will find out more. Guest Info: Dr. Richard Vinen specializes in twentieth century history. His current research is on Modern Britain He published Thatcher’s Britain (Simon and Schuster, 2009) and is currently working on a study of military service in post-war Britain. Previously he has worked mainly on twentieth century France and produced a number of publications on Vichy, the fourth republic and the Algerian War.

In this episode, we challenge decades of US policy toward Iran, arguing for a strategic pivot from maximum pressure to managed deterrence. We explore how Washington can secure the Strait of Hormuz—not through carrier strike groups alone, but by leveraging economic statecraft and regional diplomacy. With Iran’s nuclear threshold shrinking and global oil chokepoints under threat, the future of maritime order hangs in the balance. Tune in to understand why a new Hormuz doctrine is essential—and how US recalibration could either stabilize or shatter the emerging multipolar world.Guest Info: Dr. Jamsheed Choksy is a professor of Central Eurasian Studies at Indiana University, Bloomington. Professor Jamsheed Choksy’s research broadly covers the development of societies, especially sectarian communities, in Central Asia, the Near East and South Asia studied through interdisciplinary approaches involving history, religious studies, international affairs, politics, anthropology, archaeology, language.

Since President Trump expressed his interests in "taking over" Cuba, the Cuban government has been very anxious. It is one thing to listen to the political rhetorics from Trump, it is even more concerning to see how Trump will make it happen. Geopolitical games are no longer the same, instead, it is making more chaos these days. In this brand-new talk, Professor Weyland joins the show to share more details. Guest Info: Professor Kurt Weyland's research interests focus on democratization and authoritarian rule, on social policy and policy diffusion, and on populism in Latin America and Europe. He has drawn on a range of theoretical and methodological approaches, including insights from cognitive psychology, and has done extensive field research in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Peru, and Venezuela. After receiving a Staatsexamen from Johannes-Gutenberg Universitat Mainz in 1984, a M.A. from UT in 1986, and a Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1991, he taught for ten years at Vanderbilt University and joined UT in 2001. He has received research support from the SSRC and NEH and was a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, DC, in 1999/2000 and at the Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame, in 2004/05. From 2001 to 2004, he served as Associate Editor of the Latin American Research Review.

In this episode, we’re breaking down the intricate political and economic ties between Japan and the US—a partnership that defines stability in the Indo-Pacific. But with Trump’s upcoming visit to China, the calculus is shifting. Will Washington send strong signals to its key allies, Japan and Taiwan, or will the promise of a deal with Beijing raise new anxieties? We’ll explore the high-stakes diplomacy and what it means for the future of the alliance.Guest info: Dr. Michael Green is CEO of the U.S. Studies Centre at the University of Sydney and Henry A. Kissinger Chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Previously, he was Director of Asian Studies and Chair in Modern and Contemporary Japanese Politics and Foreign Policy at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. During the George W. Bush administration, Green served as Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and Senior Director for Asian Affairs at the National Security Council. He is the author of Line of Advantage: Japan’s Grand Strategy in the Era of Abe Shinzo, among other books.

It is rather confusing to understand the political, and the military strategies under American President Donald Trump, when it comes to the war with Iran. Over one month into the war, the international community still seeks "better answers" from Trump, while other parts of the world look for better economic and political partners. In this brand-new episode, Mr. Avraham (Avrum) Burg, who served as interim President of Israel for 20 days, from July 12 to August 1, 2000, joins the show to talk about the current political state in Israel and what we should expect from America. Guest Info: Mr. Avraham (Avrum) Burg is a thinker, a writer and a peace activist. Avrum Burg began his political career in the movement against the Lebanon War. He continued on to a long political career where he served in a variety of public positions including in the Knesset as a member of the Labor Party, Speaker of the Knesset, and Chairman of the Jewish Agency.

President Trump launched a war of choice against Iran, declaring victory one moment while demanding NATO allies join the fight the next . But Germany said ‘this is not our war,’ and the EU insists it was ‘not consulted’ . So why did the alliance refuse to help? Because under NATO’s charter, this conflict falls outside their defensive boundaries, leaving Trump fuming that the alliance is a ‘one-way street’ . Today, we dissect the contradictions in Washington’s strategy and why traditional allies are keeping their distance."Guest Info: Prof. Jamsheed K. Choksy is a Distinguished Professor, former Chair of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, former Chair of the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, and current Director of the Inner Asian and Uralic National Resource Center (US Title VI) at Indiana University - Bloomington. In 2008, he was nominated by President George W. Bush to the National Council on the Humanities and served as a member of the council until 2019.

Four years. That’s how long Russia thought this war would take—days. Instead, we are now entering the fifth year of a conflict that has become a brutal test of will. And as the missiles keep flying and the front lines barely move, two very different pictures are emerging.On one side, you have Ukraine. A nation that, despite the cold and the constant pressure, is more unified than ever. We’re seeing it in places you can’t measure on a map—in the secret ceremonies where special forces bind themselves to centuries of warrior tradition, reminding themselves that they are not just soldiers, but a single, unbreakable 'pack' . This isn’t just about holding the line; it’s about identity. It’s about survival.And on the other side? Russia. A country that increasingly looks strong only on the surface. Sure, the cafes in Moscow are still open, but beneath that facade, the confidence is cracking . The Kremlin is burning through unimaginable resources—over 1,280,000 troops lost, thousands of tanks destroyed—just to grind forward a few meters at a time . They are paying an insane price of 156 soldiers for every square kilometer of land they occupy .Today, we’re going to look at the shifting momentum of this war. How Ukrainian unity is solidifying into an unbreakable wall, and why Russia—despite its size—is starting to show the cracks of a losing effort.Guest Info: Paul Hockenos is a Berlin-based journalist. His recent book is Berlin Calling: A Story of Anarchy, Music, the Wall, and the Birth of the New Berlin.

Sitting US President Donald Trump promised to end the war with Iran soon, given the fact that his administration has caused major international concerns and military confusion. It is one thing to know how this war will cause domestic sacrifice among the voters, it is another issue to add unwanted anxieties upon the international leaders. In this brand-new conversation, Dr. Jamsheed Choksy will explain the latest from Trump and Iran. Guest Info: Dr. Jamsheed Choksy is a professor of Central Eurasian Studies at Indiana University, Bloomington. Professor Jamsheed Choksy’s research broadly covers the development of societies, especially sectarian communities, in Central Asia, the Near East and South Asia studied through interdisciplinary approaches involving history, religious studies, international affairs, politics, anthropology, archaeology, language.

More Than four years, war in Ukraine continues to be the attention of the international community. In addition to the reactions and the political shifts in the US, leaders in Europe are also demanding the active participation of the US. According to the recent political expert, it is time for Ukraine to give up and ask for further dialogues from Russia. Will Ukraine do as it is needed? How about the voices of the European allies? Guest info: Professor Michael C. Desch is the Packey J. Dee Professor of International Relations at the University of Notre Dame and founding Brian and Jeannelle Brady Family Director of the O'Brien Notre Dame International Security Center.

It is never America's job to choose the next leader for The Islamic Republic of Iran, according to the Trump administration. The destiny is in the hands of Iranian people, if they desire. Some believe Trump administration should leave the nation alone, let alone putting boots on the ground, while others oppose. In this special interview, we will discuss all the necessary details. Guest Info: Professor Jamsheed K. Choksy is a Distinguished Professor, former Chair of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, former Chair of the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, and current Director of the Inner Asian and Uralic National Resource Center (US Title VI) at Indiana University - Bloomington. In 2008, he was nominated by President George W. Bush to the National Council on the Humanities and served as a member of the council until 2019.

Tensions are at a breaking point. President Trump is weighing a military strike on Iran, with options on the table that range from limited attacks to a full-scale campaign . But behind the scenes, his own generals are pushing back. We’re learning that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, has personally warned the White House that an attack could be far more dangerous than anticipated—pointing to depleted munitions, the risk of a prolonged conflict, and the threat to American troops . So, is the U.S. heading toward war? And will Trump listen to his top advisors or pull the trigger? Today, we break down the military standoff with Iran and the last-ditch diplomatic talks in Geneva that could decide it all. Guest info: Professor Jamsheed Choksy is a Distinguished Professor, former Chair of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, former Chair of the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, and current Director of the Inner Asian and Uralic National Resource Center (US Title VI) at Indiana University - Bloomington. In 2008, he was nominated by President George W. Bush to the National Council on the Humanities and served as a member of the council until 2019.

We've heard of the United Nations, but what about the Board of Peace? Donald Trump has created a new world order—literally. His much-ballyhooed Board of Peace is officially up and running, with the goal of tackling global conflict. But rather than bringing clarity, it's leaving the world more confused than ever . Allies are divided, with some European powers refusing to join while authoritarian regimes sign up . With a billion-dollar price tag for permanent membership and Trump holding the gavel, is this a genuine peace initiative or a Trump-branded clubhouse? We break down the new power play." Guest Info: Professor Paul Poast is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago, where his area of research and teaching is international relations.

Sierra Leone is one special nation today, given the fact that natural resources are plethora, as well as the hospitality of the people. This African nation continues to allure travelers around the world. Meanwhile, this nation has gone through so much in the past few decades, especially how social and political changes created deeper memories for many. In this special interview, Betsy Small, author of a new book called " Before Before: A Story of Discovery and Loss in Sierra Leone," joins the show to share her stories while living and working in in Sierra Leone.

Many people believe Donald Trump is a personalist because his leadership style prioritizes loyalty to him above all else—over political ideology, party platforms, or even institutional rules . He has reshaped the Republican Party into what scholars describe as a "personal political vehicle," where control is maintained through unwavering fealty rather than traditional party structures. Ultimately, the perception stems from how Trump has centralized power around his persona, making himself the singular focus of his political movement. In this episode, Professor Seva Gunitsky, an associate professor of political science at the University of Toronto, joins the latest show to talk more. His work examines how international forces like war and globalization shape democracy and domestic reforms.

As we continue to pay much closer attention to the complication of geopolitical games these days, it is equally crucial for us to understand how fat the world has come. The issue of slavery has been critical for us, as we prepare to step forward to a new year. In this special episode, we will talk to Dr. Carries Gibson, author of the amazing book :The Great Resistance: The 400-Year Fight to End Slavery in the Americas." Dr. Gibson will share with us the research and the details in this book. Carrie Gibson is the author of three works of history: The Great Resistance: The 400-Year Fight to End Slavery in the Americas (2026), El Norte: The Epic and Forgotten Story of Hispanic North America (2019), and Empire’s Crossroads: A History of the Caribbean From Columbus to the Present Day (2014). Prior to gaining a PhD in history at the University of Cambridge in 2011, she worked as journalist for The Guardian and Observer in London. She is currently living in Seoul, South Korea.

Can a single conflict rewrite the rules of global power? Since the full-scale invasion, Ukraine has become the epicenter of a struggle not just for territory, but for the future of the international order. By defiantly defending its sovereignty, it challenges the very idea of spheres of influence and redraws the boundaries of security. This reset hinges on a pivotal, often paradoxical player: China. While officially calling for peace, Beijing’s economic and diplomatic support for Russia provides a critical lifeline, positioning China not as a neutral mediator, but as a decisive architect of whatever new world emerges from this war.Dr. Alexander John Motyl is an American historian, political scientist, poet, writer, translator, and painter. He is a resident of New York City. He is professor of political science at Rutgers University in Newark, New Jersey, and a specialist on Ukraine, Russia, and the Soviet Union.

In this new episode, we turn to Syria—a nation shattered by over a decade of civil war, now a fractured chessboard of regime control, foreign militias, and humanitarian crisis. The economy is in freefall, with currency collapse and crippling sanctions deepening civilian despair. Enter President Trump, whose policy has been defined by a sudden withdrawal of U.S. troops, a focus on defeating ISIS, and stark warnings to adversaries like Iran and Russia, all while imposing the heaviest economic pressures yet on Damascus. We examine the volatile results of this "America First" approach to a deeply complex war.Guest Info: Dr. Jamsheed Choksy is a professor of Central Eurasian Studies at Indiana University, Bloomington. Professor Jamsheed Choksy’s research broadly covers the development of societies, especially sectarian communities, in Central Asia, the Near East and South Asia studied through interdisciplinary approaches involving history, religious studies, international affairs, politics, anthropology, archaeology, language.

What is happening in the city of Minneapolis draws the attention beyond the domestic audience. The ongoing protests and riots are causing major political and economic concerns for both the Democrats and the Republicans. People in China and Iran are seeking opportunities to "re-engage" with US, as the international policies continue to shift. In this special episode, Dr. Michael Patrick, a renowned international affairs scholar joins the show to share his insights and analysis.