The Sonia Elijah Podcast

I recently joined Michael on his show for a wide-ranging conversation about my book, 3/11 Viral Takeover. Key Points from the discussion:* The engineered narrative from day one: How top scientists (including Fauci, Farrar, and others) privately discussed lab-origin possibilities while publicly condemning it as a “conspiracy theory” in the Lancet and elsewhere. Conflicts of interest were hidden.* The flawed foundation for lockdowns: Neil Ferguson’s Imperial College model, its catastrophic (and wrong) predictions, and how one paper shut down the world despite early contrary data from Nobel laureate Michael Levitt and the Diamond Princess cruise ship.* Suppression of early treatments: The coordinated attack on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin — including the retracted Surgisphere scandal in The Lancet, to clear the path for emergency authorisation of the novel mRNA products.* Censorship machinery: The Trusted News Initiative, Event 201, government pressure on Big Tech, the CCDH (“Disinformation Dozen”), and the weaponisation of “misinformation” labels against scientists, doctors, and the vaccine-injured.* The bigger picture: Vaccine passports as a proof-of-concept for digital IDs, the shift to permanent biosecurity states, and the alarming rise of digital authoritarianism across the West — including arrests for social media posts and expanding surveillance.We also spoke about the human cost: the psychological operation that used fear and compliance, the silencing of the vaccine-injured, excess deaths, and why hard-copy documentation of these events matters more than ever.If you haven’t yet, grab a copy and share it. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

It was great going LIVE with Dr Drew discussing the explosive testimony from former Pfizer Europe head of toxicology Dr. Helmut Sterz, who estimates 20,000–60,000 COVID shot-related deaths in Germany alone.We covered systematic data destruction, lost serious adverse events (including child deaths with no pre-existing conditions), lack of autopsies, blanket liability granted before the pandemic declaration, regulatory capture, and the weaponization of fear.All of this and much more, is meticulously documented in my book 3/11 Viral Takeover.If you appreciate the work I do as an investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Last week I had the pleasure of sitting down again with Paul Brennan on RCR (Reality Check Radio) in New Zealand to discuss my new book, 3/11 Viral Takeover: On March 11, 2020, a Pandemic Was Declared and Our World Changed Forever.We covered the forensic timeline I spent months compiling: the pre-planned exercises like Crimson Contagion and Event 201, the rapid alignment of Moderna’s vaccine sequence just days after the viral genome was published, the invocation of emergency powers weeks before the WHO even declared a pandemic, and the coordinated machinery of fear, censorship, and compliance that followed.Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.The conversation unpacked how unelected scientific advisors (SAGE in the UK and equivalents elsewhere), international organisations, and the emerging biodefence-industrial complex effectively took control. We discussed the weaponisation of behavioural science and flawed modelling to push lockdowns, the suppression of early treatments, the known risks with mRNA technology that were ignored, and the censorship apparatus, including the BBC-led Trusted News Initiative, that silenced dissenting scientists, doctors, and even vaccine-injured individuals.We also looked ahead at the UK’s new £1 billion pandemic preparedness strategy, with its proposed “All Pandemics Hazards Bill,” expanded contract tracing, biosecurity hub, and sweeping emergency powers. Officials are already framing the next crisis as a “certainty.” As I explain in the interview, 3/11 wasn’t just a health event, it was a biological sequel to 9/11 in its scale of disruption and the permanent changes it accelerated: mass compliance, surveillance, narrative control, and the shift toward digital authoritarianism. The book is evidence-based, with 900+ citations, FOIA documents, leaked emails, scientific literature, and whistleblower interviews. Paul asked me if I’m afraid of what’s coming. My answer: No. Because knowledge is the antidote. The more people understand how the machinery worked last time, the harder it becomes to run the same playbook again.You can also listen to the full interview here.3/11 Viral Takeover is now available in Kindle, paperback, and hardcover editions.Order on Amazon.com/ Amazon.co.uk (or search “3.11 Viral Takeover Sonia Elijah” in your local Amazon store).If you’ve already read it (or once you do), I’d be incredibly grateful if you could leave an honest review on Amazon. Reviews make a huge difference in helping independent investigative work reach more people, especially on a topic this important.If you appreciate the work I do as an investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

In a world where questioning the safety of the COVID-19 shots can lead to professional ruin, cyber sabotage, and relentless smear campaigns, a group of courageous scientists continues to shine a light on alarming findings that regulators and pharmaceutical giants would prefer to remain hidden.At the end of last year, I had the privilege of speaking with Kevin McKernan, Jessica Rose, and David Speicher. Their pioneering research on uncovering shocking levels of DNA contamination in the Pfizer and Moderna shots has not only challenged the safety narrative but also ignited a firestorm of backlash, including retraction attempts.In a chilling escalation, recently the Daily Mail covered another bombshell scandal: a major oncology journal, Oncotarget, falls victim to a cyber attack mere days after publishing a damning systematic review linking COVID shots to cancer cases worldwide.Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Below is a summary of the interview’s key revelations, where the parallels become stark: a coordinated effort to silence inconvenient truths about these experimental shots. The Discovery: DNA Fragments in the Pfizer and Moderna Vaccine VialsThe interview begins with the origins of their research. Kevin McKernan, a genomics expert, first identified DNA contamination in vaccine vials back in April 2023. This led to a preprint paper in October 2023, which faced criticism for using anonymous samples.Kevin McKernan: “We got some anonymous vials and did some initial work on those. The number one critique was that you don’t know the source, someone could have contaminated them. So we got in touch with David [Speicher] and Maria [Gutschi], who had vials from Canada that were all cold-chained and tracked.”To address concerns, the team expanded their study, testing more vials and using advanced methods. Their findings showed DNA levels far exceeding regulatory limits: up to 600 times higher in some cases, particularly in Moderna vials.The paper, titled “Quantification of Residual Plasmid DNA in SV40 Promoter Enhancer Sequences in Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Mod RNA COVID-19 Vaccines from Ontario, Canada,” was published in the peer-reviewed journal Autoimmunity on September 6, 2025.Measuring DNA: qPCR vs. Fluorometry ExplainedA key point of contention is how DNA is measured. Regulators often use qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction), which targets specific DNA sequences, while the team used fluorometry for a broader view.Sonia Elijah: “What is qPCR versus fluorometry? Regulators say there’s no issue because it’s under the 10 nanograms per dose limit.”Kevin McKernan: “Fluorometry binds any double-stranded DNA. It will detect all sequences, including E. coli DNA. qPCR only targets specific pieces, like the kanamycin resistance gene, then extrapolates based on plasmid size but it misses E. coli DNA. David’s work showed varying levels across the plasmid: kanamycin or origin regions give one number, spike DNA is 100 times higher! You can’t assume uniform distribution. Regulators use qPCR on the kanamycin gene, which is lower than spike DNA, even though they have a spike assay.”Fluorometry revealed higher contamination, even after treating samples with RNase to remove RNA interference. Critics argued about “crosstalk” (where dyes might detect RNA as DNA), but the team addressed this by validating their methods.David Speicher: “Fluorometry is used to measure the RNA dose in the vaccines, so why frown upon it for DNA? We showed the dyes have low crosstalk, but we still used RNase to confirm.” The SV40 promoter sequence, known for nuclear targeting and potential cancer risks, was a major concern. The team emphasized that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) protect DNA, making the old 10 ng limit outdated.The Retraction Saga: PubPeer (PubSmear), Retraction Watch, and Conflicts of InterestJust 11 days after publication, the paper came under investigation due to comments on PubPeer (dubbed “PubSmear” by the group) and complaints from reviewer Rolf Marschalek. The team uncovered a network involving PubPeer, Retraction Watch, and individuals with ties to vaccine funding. Retraction Watch leaked a review PDF, revealing Marschalek as the author, despite his conflict of interest, as their paper critiqued his work (Kaiser et al., Vaccine 2025, 55:127022).Jessica Rose: “We got an email saying the paper was under investigation because of a PubPeer commenter. Ironically, the comment was fabricated, a made-up quote from a referenced paper by Klinman et al. The probe was prompted by that and Rolf Marschalek. It’s ongoing; on the 22nd, they added an ‘under investigation’ note. On November 20, Retraction Watch emailed us, accidentally revealing they’d received a review (against COPE guidelines) and attached another PDF. Metadata showed [Rolf] Marschalek as author. It’s a scandal! A network paying $5,000 for retractions, targeting narrative-challenging papers. We have timelines and receipts showing guideline violations.”Kevin McKernan: “Marschalek works at DFG in Germany, which invested 30 million euros in BioNTech and 300 million in COVAX. He shouldn’t have reviewed us. He claimed he rejected the paper, but the editor said he only suggested modifications.”Funding links were exposed: PubPeer and Retraction Watch share backing from the Arnold Foundation (Enron ties). Kevin McKernan: “They’re in cahoots. Retraction Watch points to PubPeer’s anonymous complaints, allowing sock-puppet attacks, and some critics boast about payments for retractions.”David Speicher: “All this is U.S. tax-deductible. It’s a cartel. PubPeer rips papers apart anonymously, Retraction Watch publicizes it.”The team responded with a 22-page rebuttal, but the process remains opaque. They suspect ideological bias, as similar scrutiny is not applied to pro-vaccine studies.A Pattern of Suppression: From Retractions to Cyber SabotageThe scientists discussed systemic issues, including how peer review originated from intelligence-linked figures like Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell’s father).Kevin McKernan: “Peer review was a mechanism for influence capture. It’s a $40 billion market with better margins than Google, but it’s captured by pharma ads.”They criticized regulators like Australia’s TGA for using flawed qPCR assays and ignoring spike DNA. Recent findings show methylated DNA and RNA-DNA hybrids, explaining high contamination.Jessica Rose: “Every rock turned over reveals another issue. Attacks make our work better: they motivate us.”The group proposes a decentralized alternative: peer-to-peer review on blockchain platforms like Nostr or Bitcoin, where reviewers are paid directly, bypassing gatekeepers.Kevin McKernan: “Put papers on immutable ledgers. Pay reviewers the $3,000 journal fee instead. It creates competition and quality.”They hope the new U.S. administration, including RFK Jr. and Sen. Ron Johnson, will investigate via RICO laws for racketeering.The team is divided on retraction odds but united in resolve. Two follow-up papers are in progress, reinforcing their findings.David Speicher: “It’s on the U.S. Congressional record. Retracting it now would expose bias.”Jessica Rose: “If it gets retracted, it’ll raise a stink. We’re real scientists. We’ll keep publishing.”Kevin McKernan: “Reproduction is key. Attacks breed distrust, but our data stands.”As if to underscore the depths of this corruption, consider the recent cyberattack on the journal Oncotarget, which published a peer-reviewed paper by eminent Browns University cancer researcher Dr. Wafik El-Deiry and Tufts University cancer researcher Charlotte Kuperwasser. Their study, released in early January 2026, reviewed global evidence from 2020–2025 linking COVID-19 vaccinations and infections to cancer signals, including 333 cases across 27 countries, where cancers were newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened shortly after vaccination. Titled “Evaluation of Cancer Reports Following COVID-19 Vaccination and Infection,” the paper challenged the narrative around vaccine safety by highlighting potential oncogenic (cancer-causing) risks, such as “turbo cancers.”Mere days after publication, Oncotarget was hit by a sophisticated cyberattack that took the entire site offline, effectively censoring the paper. The journal reported the incident to the FBI, describing it as a “malicious cyberattack.” The attacks disrupted online publications and website access, with the journal alleging possible involvement from individuals linked to PubPeer (the so-called “PubSmear” network) in hacking, offline disruptions, and search result manipulation.Dr. Wafik El-Deiry took to X to condemn the incident:“Freedom of the Press is protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution.But Censorship is alive and well in the US and has come into medicine in a big awful way. The future is bleak if weaponized censorship in medicine continues to suppress any narratives that stand up to pharma, that expose inconvenient or suppressed truth.”Critics, including those in the “PubSmear” network, have not only been quick to dismiss El-Deiry’s findings as unproven but have reportedly harassed him with daily attacks. This is not isolated; it echoes the tactics we have seen in the suppression of vaccine-critical research. As with the interviewees’ work, this incident exposes how far powerful interests will go to protect the multi-billion-dollar mRNA technology narrative, resorting even to digital sabotage.Furthermore, these disturbing findings on DNA contamination (including the SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences) do not stand in isolation. They directly intersect with the emerging evidence of cancer risks highlighted in Dr. El-Deiry’s groundbreaking review. El-Deiry’s analysis of 333 temporal cancer cases post-vaccination strongly suggests that such contaminants warrant serious investigation as a plausible contributor to rapid-onset or progressive malignancies, often termed “turbo cancers.”Together, these studies demand urgent, independent replication and scrutiny, far beyond the reach of smears, retractions, or cyberattacks.If you appreciate the work I do as an investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

In this explosive 47-minute interview, GreenMedInfo founder Sayer Ji reveals what it was really like to be publicly branded as one of the world’s leading “anti-vaxxers,” and being named on the “Disinformation Dozen’s” list, back in 2021.The CCDH report that made him infamous claimed that 13 (actually mislabelled as the “Disinformation Dozen”) individuals produced 65% of all anti-vaccine content. Meta’s own audit later found the true number was 0.05% – a 1,300-fold lie. President Biden accused them of “killing people,” the Surgeon General called them dangerous, and the Department of Homeland Security classified vaccine-safety dissent as potential domestic terrorism. Ji’s journey began decades earlier. A chronically ill child saved by natural medicine, he spent years managing health-food stores in Florida and collating peer-reviewed research showing natural compounds often outperform drugs. In 2008 he launched GreenMedInfo.com, which now hosts ~100,000 studies on 10,000+ topics. As early as 2013, UNICEF and U.S. military IPs were monitoring the site; by 2020 the BBC-led Trusted News Initiative had ranked GreenMedInfo among “far-right extremist” outlets exploiting COVID.In mid-2021, within months of the CCDH report, Ji and most of the listed individuals were simultaneously deplatformed from every major social network (Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, even Linktree) despite audiences totalling millions. He describes this as the moment the open, organic Web 2.0 era ended and algorithmic narrative control was fully weaponized. Behind the censorship, Ji says, was transatlantic coordination:* August 2021: the UK Foreign Office gave a censorship “masterclass” inside the Biden White House–revealed in documents obtained by American First Legal in its litigation against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).* NATO’s 2019 “tanks and tweets” doctrine officially equated dissenting speech with physical warfare.* 2024 leaked CCDH documents revealed the organisation ran literal “black ops” against RFK Jr. during the U.S. election.On a personal level, Ji and his then-wife (holistic psychiatrist Dr. Kelly Brogan, also on the list) were targeted by Charles Kriel’s 2022 “Dis/Informed” documentary. Kriel, who has deep ties to NATO’s Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (StratCom COE), used photos of their child and portrayed maskless breathing as a terrorist threat. He describes death threats, reputational warfare, and pressure on loved ones so severe he still cannot fully disclose it.“The more coherent and loving you remain, the less it works… Non-violent non-compliance and speaking truthfully is how we win.”He sees the ultimate stakes as bodily and cognitive sovereignty. The multi-trillion-dollar biomedical–military–media complex cannot tolerate the message that the human body can largely heal itself. Vaccine passports, digital IDs, the UK Online Safety Act, EU Digital Services Act, and the breaking of end-to-end encryption are all steps toward a biosecurity control grid where medical compliance enforces total surveillance.“We are in another 1776 moment… Humanity can still choose regeneration over control.”Yet, Ji ends on a hopeful note: the United States remains the biggest obstacle to this new world order because of its founding principles. The 2024 election was a second 1776 moment. With transparency and accountability (starting with figures like CCDH’s Imran Ahmed, whom he accuses of acting as an unregistered foreign agent), a healthy, post-imperial US–UK relationship is still possible, and humanity can choose regeneration over control.You can read all of Sayer’s highly informative articles on his Substack Sayer Ji If you appreciate the hard work I do as an independent investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

In a ruling that has ignited fierce criticism, a UK tribunal last month sided with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and refused to order the release of fully anonymised record-level data linking COVID-19 vaccination dates to dates of death. Dr Clare Craig, a medical doctor, diagnostic pathologist and co-chair of the HART Group (Health Advisory & Recovery Team), has spent nearly three years attempting to obtain the data through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. In an exclusive interview, she laid bare the extraordinary lengths to which government bodies went to prevent public scrutiny. What data was requested? Dr Craig asked for nothing that could identify any individual:* Only adults aged 20 and over* 10-year age bands (the same used in official publications)* Vaccination dates and death dates randomly shifted by a few days (a standard anonymisation technique)* No names, no exact dates of birth, no postcodes, no causes of death“This is about a population-level problem,” Dr Craig emphasised. “There is literally no way any individual could be identified from this dataset.”Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.The shifting excusesThe UKHSA initially refused on the grounds that randomising dates constituted “creating new data” – an argument demolished by existing case law. When that failed, the agency pivoted repeatedly:* First: privacy concerns and risk of “jigsaw identification”* Then: public safety – claiming release could cause “mental distress” to bereaved families or incite violence against doctors and scientists* Finally: the surreal assertion that checking the data for re-identification risks would take one person 76 years to complete (a figure eerily identical to the FDA’s excuse for delaying Pfizer trial documents)The tribunal ultimately accepted the “health and safety” argument – that the spreadsheet, if released, could somehow be misused by “anti-vaxxers” to harass relatives or fuel threats – despite no evidence being presented that this has ever happened anywhere in the world where similar data is public.Secret hearings and cherry-picked evidenceSome parts of the case were heard in closed sessions from which Dr Craig was excluded. She were given only “gists” of the secret evidence presented to the judge. Most controversially, a witness statement from eminent psychotherapist Dr Christian Buckland – arguing that truth and transparency are psychologically protective and that openness prevents, rather than causes, distress – was ruled inadmissible and excluded from the official bundle. Astonishingly, the judge later quoted from the excluded statement in his written decision, selectively stitching together phrases to suggest the exact opposite of Dr Buckland’s professional opinion.International comparisons expose the absurdityWhile British authorities claim the data is too “dangerous” to release, other countries have published far more detailed record-level information without incident:* The Czech Republic has had fully public, highly granular vaccination–death data available for years. Independent analyses have been conducted; no harassment, no violence, no mental-health crisis among the bereaved has ensued.* A brand-new Royal Society Open Science paper (November 2025) on German regional data – where vaccination rates varied dramatically – clearly demonstrates higher all-cause mortality in highly vaccinated areas after 2021, using districts as their own historical controls.Excess deaths and the disappearing statisticsDr Craig highlighted the suspicious timing:* In 2023 the Office for National Statistics (ONS) abruptly stopped publishing deaths by vaccination status – data that had started to show concerning trends.* At almost exactly the same moment, the ONS introduced a new, highly complex excess-death baseline model that double-counts upward trends in age and region, artificially inflating “expected” deaths. The result: weeks that would previously have been flagged as clear excess now appear normal or even below expectation.* Identical baseline hikes occurred simultaneously in Australia, the Netherlands, and elsewhere.“By 2022 the virus was behaving like a common cold, lockdowns were over, and we should have seen a mortality deficit as the frail had sadly already passed away in 2020–21,” Dr Craig explained. “Instead we saw persistent excess deaths – highest in the most heavily vaccinated countries and regions.”A dam of public suspicionThe Telegraph’s coverage of the tribunal ruling attracted more than 1,500 reader comments – almost unanimously expressing alarm and demanding transparency. The handful defending the official line were drowned out. Dr Craig believes the case may ultimately achieve more through publicity than the data itself would have done:“I wanted the spreadsheet, but the fact that the government fought this hard, using secret courts and ever-more outlandish excuses, tells its own story. Lack of transparency breeds suspicion. They have made a massive strategic error.”She remains resolute: “The conversation has to be had now. People are no longer paralysed by fear. They are ready to listen.”Whether the UK government can continue to suppress basic mortality data in the face of mounting public anger remains to be seen. For now, the door has been slammed shut – but the noise on the other side is growing louder.If you appreciate the hard work I do as an independent investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Independent researchers, Dr. David Wiseman PhD, MRPharmS and Maria Gutschi BScPhm, PharmD, highlight the profound flaws in the safety monitoring and regulatory oversight of the COVID shots. They discuss their research, detailed in two preprints on ResearchGate:* ‘Signal loss by truancy, masking, and filtering, and underestimation of potential risks and suspected adverse reactions in the Disproportionality Signal Analyses of VAERS data associated with COVID-19 pro-vaccines’ (September 2025) Author: Dr. David Wiseman* ‘Great expectations and generous reading of guidelines underestimate potential risk in oversight of COVID- 19 pro-vaccine quality, safety testing, and manufacturing: 248 questions for FDA’ (September 2025)Authors: Dr David Wiseman and Maria Gutschi The 763 Lost Safety Signals in VAERS AnalysisDavid’s initial preprint analyzes the FDA’s empirical Bayesian disproportionality signal detection in VAERS data for the COVID modRNA shots, which he refers to as “pro-vaccines” due to their gene-therapy-like mechanism. He identifies three methodological flaws—truancy, masking, and filtering—that systematically underestimated risks, leading to the loss of hundreds of potential safety signals.* Truancy: This refers to signals that “went missing” without explanation. By cross-referencing the FDA’s data with more comprehensive datasets, David estimates 281 unreported signals. For instance, myocarditis signals for Moderna and pulmonary embolism for both Moderna and Pfizer vanished from the FDA’s reports, despite statistical plausibility.* Masking: Adverse events from one vaccine (e.g., Pfizer’s myocarditis cases) were erroneously lumped into the control group for another (e.g., Moderna), obscuring true signals. The FDA used Oracle’s Empirica software but skipped its masking-adjustment feature, potentially hiding another 365 signals.* Filtering: The FDA raised the statistical threshold for signal detection too high, excluding an estimated 117 additional signals. In total, 763 signals were lost, plus 580 “borderline” cases warranting further scrutiny.These signals represent potential risks under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) laws, requiring FDA investigation without proving causality. David criticizes a “double standard”: efficacy claims were accepted on probabilistic evidence, while safety concerns demanded ironclad proof, eroding trust in regulatory decisions and VAERS as the nation’s early warning system. Notably, the analysis revealed imbalances favouring Janssen signals (110 of 124 in an April 2022 FDA report) over Pfizer (8) and Moderna (6), despite the latter’s far greater usage (5–9 times more doses). After adjustments, Janssen still showed 5–8 times more signals, often hematological (e.g., thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, or TTS). David argues the 2021 TTS pause distracted from broader issues, like myocarditis signals emerging in February 2021 but not acknowledged until May. The Brighton Collaboration: Obscuring HarmsMaria critiques the Brighton Collaboration’s standardized definitions for adverse events following immunization (AEFI), originally designed for conventional vaccines in the early 2000s. Its algorithmic, high-threshold approach, she argues, is mismatched for mRNA pro-vaccines, which involve a “pharmacological phase” (mRNA translation) before immune activation. Key concerns include:* Catch-All Categories: Events like racing heartbeats are often classified as “immunization stress-related responses” (ISRR) or anxiety, bypassing deeper investigation. Take for instance the Maddie de Garay case, a Pfizer adolescent trial participant, whose disabling symptoms were dismissed as anxiety despite life-altering injuries (Maddie remains dependent on her feeding tube and wheelchair). * Causality Hurdles: Updated in 2019, the WHO-aligned criteria demand population-level data and temporal proof, nearly impossible for new platforms. “Unclassifiable” events pile up, unlike standard pharmacovigilance where they’re deemed “improbable.” Maria notes this enabled quick labeling for myocarditis only because of prior vaccine precedents (e.g., smallpox), not robust new evidence.She calls for reevaluating AEFI criteria to better capture mRNA-specific risks, ensuring informed consent via accurate labeling.The Second Paper: Regulatory Failures and the 248 Questions FDAPrompted by Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo’s 2023 letter on DNA contamination and FDA’s Dr. Peter Marks’ response, the second preprint, authored by David and Maria—”Great Expectations and Generous Reading of Guidelines Underestimate Potential Risk”—dissects oversight failures in manufacturing, safety testing, and quality. It culminates in 248 scientific questions for the FDA, highlighting gaps in oversight that remain largely unaddressed.* Biodistribution and Persistence: No comprehensive human studies exist on mRNA/spike protein distribution or duration. Maria stresses that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) don’t uniformly transfect cells or produce protein—luciferase proxy studies mislead due to its short half-life. Recent data show mRNA persisting up to 703 days, contradicting “arm-localized” claims.* DNA Contamination and Genotoxicity: SV40 promoter sequences and residual DNA exceed guidelines (10 ng/dose, claiming no regulator had asked! Moderna’s equivocal genotoxicity studies were partially omitted from FDA summaries. David debunks Marks’ nuclear-entry impossibility by noting mitosis dissolves the membrane, enabling integration risks—as preliminarily shown in vitro by labs like Dr. Phillip Buckhault’s.* Manufacturing and Frameshifting: EMA queries on truncated mRNA and unintended proteins (e.g., via ribosomal frameshifting) received evasive answers. The 248 questions probe these, plus LNP instability, drug interactions, and untested batch variations.Click below to support the critical, ongoing research of Dr. David Wiseman and Maria Gutschi, uncovering vital truths about vaccine safety and regulatory oversight.If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Josh Guetzkow, a senior lecturer at Hebrew University with a PhD in sociology from Princeton and a Harvard postdoc in public health policy, discussed his groundbreaking preprint study with me. The study, conducted with co-authors including Retsef Levi, Tracy Beth Høeg, Joseph Fraiman, and Maccabi Health Services experts, analyzed fetal loss rates among over 220,000 pregnancies in Israel’s Maccabi Health Services database (2016–2022). Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Using an advanced observed-to-expected analysis, Guetzkow’s team found a significant safety signal: women vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 shot during gestational weeks 8–13 experienced ~4 additional fetal losses per 100 pregnancies compared to the expected 9 (13 observed). Notably, over half of these losses were stillbirths (post-week 20), with nearly half occurring after week 25! These findings contrast with lower-than-expected losses for influenza-vaccinated women, suggesting a healthy vaccinee effect.Unlike prior studies, which missed this critical safety signal- by focusing only on early pregnancy or separating miscarriages from stillbirths, the study authors used individual-level health records to adjust for comorbidities and other factors, enhancing reliability. The signal was dose-specific, with two doses (first and second) showing a stronger effect (4 excess losses) than a single third dose (2 excess losses) during pregnancy. Guetzkow highlighted the absence of clinical trials for pregnant women and criticized public health authorities for recommending vaccination despite known risks, such as lipid nanoparticle placental transfer documented in Pfizer’s own reports, which I covered in early 2023, after being one of the first researchers to discover Pfizer’s 8-page damning document, buried in the FDA’s Pfizer data dump. Guetzkow debunked misleading claims about 82% miscarriage rates that discredit valid concerns. He also refuted conspiracy theories about Israel receiving placebo vaccines, noting early adverse event reports, including myocarditis, from the Israeli population.I highly recommend reading Guetzkow’s substack article on this groundbreaking study.Download the study here. Below is a link to an Israeli documentary mentioned in the interview.The testimonies project - a platform for all those who were affected after the corona vaccineIt’s worth watching my previous interview with Guetzkow, where he was one of the first researchers to expose Pfizer’s “Bait-and-Switch.” If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

In this compelling interview, consultant pharmacist Maria Gutschi, BScPhm, PharmD, delivers a thorough analysis of the numerous manufacturing “red flags” tied to the COVID-19 mRNA injections, spotlighting what she terms Pfizer’s “hard fraud.” She reveals her deep concerns about the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding manufacturing issues, contamination, and regulatory oversight. Before diving into her insights, it’s important to revisit the DNA/SV40 contamination scandal, which underscores the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) concerns raised by Maria in the interview. Over the last two years, numerous independent labs across the United States, Canada, Germany, Japan, France and more recently the Czech Republic, have verified the presence of plasmid DNA—significantly exceeding the regulatory cap of 10 ng/dose—in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna’s COVID-19 injections with SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence specifically identified in the Pfizer/BioNTech’s product. This alarming discovery was initially uncovered by Kevin McKernan in April 2023. My earlier investigations on this scandal can be read below. Manufacturing red flagsIn early 2021, Maria Gutschi began her own research on what she calls Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech’s “gene-therapy products.” While digging though the European Medicine Agency’s EPARs (European Public Assessment Reports) on the mRNA vaccines, she was shocked at its content. Unlike typical EPARs she had reviewed over a decade, this one listed numerous "specific obligations"- legally binding requirements for manufacturers, particularly around manufacturing quality- that were unprecedented in scope and focus. Maria emphasized that for biologics like mRNA vaccines, "the process is the product," meaning manufacturing flaws directly affect safety and efficacy.Whenever you manufacture a biologic, it is always a problem getting the purity right, because the process is the product.The process on how you make a biological is what you end up with.The EPAR highlighted significant manufacturing concerns, including:* Purity and Consistency: The EMA flagged multiple unresolved issues, such as ensuring the spike protein produced was authentic and consistent across batches.* Specific Obligations: Unlike usual clinical trial follow-ups, five or six obligations focused on manufacturing, which Maria found unusual and indicative of deeper problems.DNA contamination findingsMaria became involved in investigating DNA contamination in the vaccine vials. Notably, she was co-author of the preprint paper by Speicher et al., published in October 2023, which confirmed Kevin McKernan’s troubling findings of DNA/SV40 contamination in the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vials vastly exceeeding the regulatory cap. The presence of plasmid DNA with regulatory sequences (e.g., SV40 in Pfizer) and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) enabling cellular entry raised concerns about genomic integration and biological activity.Other key issues explored* Blotgate Scandal: Maria discussed how BioNTech dismissed Western blot anomalies (unusual spike protein sizes) as glycosylation (sugar attachments), a claim the EMA accepted without sufficient follow-up. This specific obligation remains unmet as of 2025. (My investigation into this scandal can be read here.)* Ribosomal Frameshifting: A Cambridge study (December 2023) confirmed mRNA vaccines could cause frameshifting, leading to aberrant proteins with unknown effects (e.g., toxicity, autoimmunity). * SV40 Contamination: Found in Pfizer vaccines, the SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence (with an origin of replication) can amplify itself, block the p53 tumor suppressor gene, and potentially promote oncogenes, raising cancer risks. Health Canada was shocked by this undisclosed contamination but took no decisive action after Pfizer resisted accountability.* Lipid Nanoparticles: Maria criticized their classification as excipients (inactive ingredients), noting their reactive nature and ability to deliver contaminants (DNA, RNA, metals) into cells, bypassing normal regulatory mechanisms- a "Trojan horse" effect increasing risks like DNA integration.Canadian Open LetterMaria has spearheaded an open letter that will be sent on March 31 to Canadian MPs, senators, and provincial health officers, highlighting:* Health Canada’s Findings: FOI requests (ATIPs) revealed regulators’ concerns about DNA variability, SV40, LNPs, frameshifting, and IgG4 immune tolerance, yet action was stifled.* Demands: Recall the vaccines due to risk outweighing benefits, reclassify them as gene therapies (not vaccines), and fund independent lab studies to investigate mechanisms and adverse events.* SV40 Cover-Up: Pfizer’s failure to disclose SV40 violated WHO guidelines, constituting "hard fraud," with Health Canada’s response squashed internally despite initial efforts to address it.If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

In this revelatory interview, Covid vaccine injury advocate Anne Merel Kloosterman joins forces with Wybren van Haga, leader of the Dutch BVNL party, to expose a series of what appears to be, Covid-related cover-ups orchestrated by the Dutch government.Key moments from the interview include:* Covid vaccine-injured individuals in the Netherlands are forced to conceal the true cause of their injuries, labeling them as “Long Covid” to secure any compensation from the government.* Anne Merel Kloosterman recounts her heart-wrenching personal story of Covid vaccine injury and highlights her collaboration with Wybren van Haga—the only Dutch MP to openly challenge the government’s harsh Covid measures from the outset.* Wybren van Haga discloses how a pre-parliamentary Covid investigation group, in which he was a member of, was abruptly dismantled due to the Dutch government’s fear of the truths it might uncover.* The BVNL party leader details his party’s legal battle against the Dutch government over oppressive Covid curfews and their efforts to gain access to the confidential recordings of the Outbreak Management Team (OMT).* Kloosterman and van Haga explain their motivations for starting the Corona Damage Foundation, which seeks justice for those harmed by Covid vaccines, as well as the countless businesses driven to bankruptcy by lockdown mandates.For those interested in supporting the foundation, donations can be made via the link below.https://stichtingcoronaschade.nl/If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Dr Jessica Rose, PhD., a computational biologist, immunologist, and applied mathematician, has been at the forefront of analyzing safety data of the Covid shots.My first interview with her took place in August 2022, which can be watched below.In my recent interview, Dr Rose delved into her 2021 paper that critically evaluated the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Her findings have highlighted major discrepancies in the data and raised important questions about the transparency, integrity, and accountability of pharmacovigilance systems. During the interview, she also shared bombshell revelations- raising serious concerns with the handling of data within systems like VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and the UK MHRA's Yellow Card system. Here's a summary of key points from the interview:* Data Integrity Issues:A noticeable alteration in VAERS data occurred in late 2022. Specifically, over 100,000 foreign data set reports, linked to the MHRA Yellow Card system, had crucial fields erased, including free-text narratives, symptom descriptions, chronic conditions, and diagnostic details.The removal of these fields obscured specific safety signals for myocarditis, neuropathy, and pulmonary embolism.* Implications for Safety Signals:The manipulation or elimination of data fields compromises the ability to detect adverse event trends. This undermines the systems’ fundamental purpose- to ensure public safety by identifying potential risks!* Wider Issues with Raw Data:Jessica expressed broader distrust in the accuracy of “raw” data, citing evidence of manipulation before the data reaches public databases. This completely erodes confidence in the entire process, as raw data is the cornerstone for objective scientific analysis.* Dangers of self-amplifying mRNA gene-therapy shots:Jessica raised serious concerns over the risk of recombination between self-amplifying RNA vaccines and native viruses. She spoke about the fact that there has been no informed consent regarding the Phase 1 trial, recently green lit by the FDA on November 14, for Arcturus Therapeutics’ Investigational New Drug (IND) candidate, ARCT-2304, aimed at addressing H5N1 influenza.Some of the important topics discussed by Jessica in the interview, can be read about below:My mission is to deep-dive into public interest stories, which the mainstream media avoids but I cannot do that without your help. If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation to support my work of forensic-style investigative journalism. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

My second interview with Wouter Aukema, senior data patterns & forensics analyst, who has over 30 years of experience working with governments and corporations- is the most explosive yet. The first interview can be watched below. For the past few years, Wouter Aukema and his team have been downloading voluminous amounts of weekly data on the case safety reports on drugs and vaccines submitted to the European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance database and Dutch government institutions, such as the Dutch Health Institute. His painstaking work has led to the discovery of what can easily be described as massive data fraud, which he has written about here.Back in December 2021, Dutch parliamentary member Pieter Omtzigt brought a motion calling for an independent investigation on excess deaths in the Netherlands. He also called for the CIMS, which translates to "COVID Vaccination Information and Monitoring System” maintained by the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) for monitoring vaccination records related to COVID-19 vaccines, to be made available to independent researchers. Omtzigt’s motion was unanimously accepted in parliament. Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Rather than choose to act upon the motion, it appears the Dutch government not only stalled but sabotaged transparent access to the vaccine database. Moreover, it also rendered it unusable by deleting a staggering number of personal records. In the process of the government’s decision to transfer all the Covid vaccination records to the Dutch Statistics Bureau- over 870,000 records were systematically deleted of people who had received their first dose of a Covid vaccine and subsequently died or emigrated (between the period of January 2021 and January 2024). It is only because of Wouter and his team’s painstaking work by weekly downloading the data, that has made it possible to spot this huge anomaly. This discovery has massive ramifications as the manipulated data makes it impossible for there to be any meaningful assessment on excess deaths in relation to the Covid vaccines, in the Netherlands.However, the data crimes do not end there and are not exclusive to the Netherlands- at around 37 minutes into the interview, Wouter dropped the biggest bombshell of all! He exclusively informed me that according to his systematic downloading of the data from EudraVigilance (which includes case safety reports from around the world not just the EU)- 40% of worldwide serious case safety reports (including hospitilization and death) in relation to Covid vaccines (only) have been REMOVED from the European Medicines Agency’s database from October 2021-November 2022. In addition, case safety reports have also been retroactively modified, after their data lockpoint (DLP). Wouter presented his evidence of what appears to be horrific data fraud/manipulation by revealing a damning slide from his 140-page forensic report, yet to be published. The screenshot of the slide below, reveals a graphical representation of the cumulative number of reports mentioning fatal events (deaths). Notice, that the biggest discrepancy between the cumulative number of deaths recorded by Aukema and his team (blue graph line) and the EMA’s (orange graph line) is shown in the fourth column- these are the deaths (fatal events) following the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine. According to Pfizer/BioNTech’s Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) submitted to the EMA, which I have previously investigated here and here for Children’s Health Defense Europe, the cumulative number of reported deaths following their vaccine through to November 2022 was 8,322. However, the number of deaths based on Aukema and his team downloading weekly the case safety reports mentioning fatal events following the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine- reveals a markedly higher total of 10,193. Disturbingly, it appears almost 20% have been deleted from the EudraVigilance database. When asked the question on what he intends to do with this damning evidence, Wouter said:“In the old days, we would submit it to the auditor of the EMA and we would trust that they would follow up on it, but what can we do today? Who can we trust?”See more of Wouter and his team’s amazing work:https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aukemahttps://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aukema/vizzesSupport their work:https://www.givesendgo.com/medicine_vaccine_safety_dbMy mission is to deep-dive into public interest stories, which the mainstream media avoids but I cannot do that without your help. If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation to support my work of forensic-style investigative journalism. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

It was a pleasure to be on TNT Radio’s live show: “Locked & Loaded with Rick Munn” discussing Part 1 of my latest investigation.Sadly, it was to be my last interview on the independent media platform given that their funding was pulled recently and they have ceased operations, leaving a wide hole in the alternative media space. My mission is to deep-dive into public interest stories, which the mainstream media avoids but I cannot do that without your help. If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation to support my work of forensic-style investigative journalism. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Dr Clare Craig is a diagnostic pathologist. She practised in the NHS for 15 years, becoming a fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists. Since January 2021 she has co-chaired Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART) with Dr Jonathan Engler. This is a multi-disciplinary body of experts who have provided an independent source of information on covid issues. Dr Craig is one of the group of experts who were called to submit Witness Statements in the Covid-19 Public Inquiry – Module 4 on Vaccines. The Inquiry has postponed Module 4 until January 2025 (to start with, it was postponed indefinitely) with only 3 weeks alloted to watered down issues such as “unequal vaccine uptake.”Dr Craig calls the Covid Public Inquiry “a farce which is just eating through money. What it becomes is a years long excuse for not addressing the problems in the political forums. They just hand wave and say, oh, that's good, that's going on over there. We don't need to think about it because they are, which is ridiculous because they're not.”The delays and flaws of the Covid Public Inquiry galvanized the expert group to do it themselves. In reference to the genesis of the People’s Vaccine Inquiry, the pathologist shared: “We thought let's do it and get it out to the public as soon as possible. So that's what we've done. We've kind of come together along with a few other people who have important evidence to give, to present the core important facts for the public to hear.”During the in-depth interview an extensive range of issues were discussed:* Covid vaccines being associated with a huge rise in illness and deaths.* The lack of post-mortems (autopsies) being done* The lack of transparent data* The Midazolam scandal and DNRs in care homes and hospitals* No protection from the vaccines when there’s a new variant* Excess deaths observed around the world* DNA and SV40 contamination of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines and the risk of cancerVisit the People’s Vaccine Inquiry and take action!If you value the work I’m doing, please consider becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

"The Needle’s Secret" is Marc Girardot’s debut book. Living in Paris, France, he is a father of four and an experienced business executive with an MBA from INSEAD. His career includes advising senior executives, particularly in the automotive industry and on biotechnology strategies for a pharmaceutical company.During the Covid crisis, Girardot became a proponent of proportionate measures and natural immunity, joining the organization PANDA to offer scientific advice. His 2021 article questioning the necessity of vaccines for Covid-recovered individuals garnered significant attention, earning accolades and endorsement from Nobel Prize winner Michael Levitt.Marc Girardot's main findings on vaccines are as follows:* Accidental IV Injections: All vaccine accidents are caused by inadvertent intravenous (IV) injections, which are inevitable with intramuscular injections.* Intramuscular Injection Flaws: These injections have a long-standing design flaw, especially evident during large vaccination campaigns (e.g., 1976 swine flu, Gulf War, 1998 anthrax, 2016 dengue).* Impact of IV Injections: IV injections bypass natural protections, sending a high-density cloud of vaccine particles (a "Bolus") that can cause significant immune-mediated damage in the cardiovascular system and organs, and potentially damage stem cells, leading to cancer or genetic disorders.* Cancer Theory: Proposes a new theory of cancer based on stem cells being the origin, supported by studies.* Testing the Bolus Theory: Suggests using odds ratios to compare sick populations with the general public, noting correlations between conditions like autism and other diseases (e.g., Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, ALS, hearing/vision impairment, congenital heart disease, Celiac, obesity, cancer, genetic disorders).* Vaccines and Modern Illnesses: Asserts that all vaccines harm similarly and are likely behind the rise in modern illnesses over the past 40 years (excluding traditional flu vaccines).* Stem Cell Therapy: Promotes the potential of oxygen and other stem cell therapies (HBOT, NBOT, possibly ozone) to repair endothelial damage and revascularize damaged areas as a solution for many modern illnesses.If you value the work I’m doing, please consider becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

My bombshell interview with data expert and ethical computer hacker, Wouter Aukema from the Netherlands, exposes the true horrors of the trove of data buried within the European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance case safety reporting system- like never before!Wouter Aukema, a data forensics analyst with over 30 years experience, teamed up with a software expert to develop a tool where they were able to download ALL 15 million case safety reports over the past 20 years, for 6000 medicinal drug products and substances (within and outside of Europe) including the Covid-19 experimental shots. Up until now, the only way the scientific community had been able to analyse side effects of a specific drug was by using the highly cumbersome and opaque interface of the EMA’s database system. In the video interview, Aukema demonstrated the many problems with the system and explained:If I would want to understand the history of all side effects for this particular drug, I need to repeat this action five times for one drug. If I want to go back to 2018, I need to do that seven times for one drug. Mind you, seven times, 6,000 different drugs and substances. That's 42,000 times that I need to click on buttons, download files. This is undoable. Nobody can do this.However, thanks to Aukema and his colleague’s unique tool, the public can see for the first time the true extent of the carnage caused by the Covid-19 shots. With colour coded visual graphs and diagrams, the damning data is presented for the very first time in such an unequivocally transparent way- in stark contrast to the EMA’s nebulous system-leading one to think that obscuring the reports of the Covid vaccine side effects and indeed, for other drugs, was perhaps, intentional.Aukema’s dashboard of data shockingly showcased a three fold increase in case safety reports for the Covid-19 vaccines (at the start of the rollout) compared to all the other drug products and substances- over the past 20 years! (The blue graph line represents the number of case safety reports for the Covid-19 vaccines. The orange graph line is for the other 6000 drug products and substances.)Aukema went on to reveal:What is the most reported side effect reported for all the COVID vaccines?I was flabbergasted by this. It is COVID itself..But I thought the COVID vaccines were going to prevent COVID.” The diagram below depicts the reaction, “Covid-19” as the largest blue bubble.(In early 2022, I wrote the Substack piece, “Was Pfizer's 95% vaccine efficacy fraudulent all along?” It drew quite a bit of attention from the mainstream media evidenced by their string of targeted attack pieces against my article. In my piece, I calculated that the vaccine efficacy of the Pfizer/BNT vaccine was more in the realm of 12% not 95%, based on Pfizer’s own data provided in a FDA briefing document from December 2020, which I sourced from the FDA’s website.)It has become increasingly apparent, evidenced by the loud signal coming from the EudraVigilance database revealing Covid-19 as the most reported side effect of the Covid-19 vaccines- that my earlier calculation was not too off the mark. Aukema disclosed more bombshell findings from the data (this time for all other drugs, not including the Covid vaccines)- the sudden explosion starting from January 2023 onwards of case safety reports for 2 specific drugs. * Keytruda, a cancer drug mainly used in adults for cancers that are advanced, have spread or returned, are not responding to other treatments or cannot be removed by surgery.* Inflectra, an anti-inflammatory medicine to treat diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and psoriasis. It is usually used when other medicines or treatments have failed. What could have caused such a sudden demand (hence increase in reporting of side effects) for a cancer drug and a medicine for chronic inflammation from the start of January 2023? Could there be a link between the increase in use for these drugs to treat certain side effects of the Covid vaccines?During the interview, Aukema highlighted another critical finding-Myocardial Infarction (heart attack) was one of the top reported cardiac disorders following Covid vaccination. The data expert made a point of stating how pericarditis and myocarditis were listed as known side effects in the packaging inserts of the Covid vaccines but myocardial infarction was surprisingly absent. Behind each case saftey report lies a person suffering from a side effect, which for some could be life-altering. It was an honour to have Anne Merel Kloosterman on the zoom call. She is the representative for the Covid vaccine injured for the Netherlands. Anne suffered from debilitating paralysis and a whole host of other problems, after her second dose of the Moderna vaccine, which she took after fearing it would become mandated by the universities. She shared an important point, when the subject of excess deaths was referenced.In the Netherlands they covered up the excess mortality data with privacy legislation, thanks to the amendment law of January 1st 2020, regarding access to medical records for next of kin. They made it legally impossible to retrieve these data and because of privacy legislation you may only perform pathological examinations of the deceased if a crime is likely have been committed or if the declaration has been signed. If the deceased did not sign the declaration as a living person, the official cause of death will remain private. In addition, there was also a redefinition of the status “vaccinated”. It takes 14 days for Moderna, Pfizer and Astra Zeneca and even 28 days for Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), before a person is defined as vaccinated, so if you die within that certain period of time the deceased will be recorded as unvaccinated.Anne went on to describe what she has experienced as a result of speaking out about Covid vaccine injuries- the shameless shutting down of her Instagram and Linked In social media accounts. She also made the poignant comment how the vaccine injured have been gas-lit from both sides: the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. For anyone wanting access to the dashboard and collection tool, created by Wouter Aukema and his colleague- the following information has been taken from Aukema’s post on X. Python script to collect all cases from EMA: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Zs8HiB3W-bd77OspdTrnhb8WiXsskfTM/view?usp=sharing (developed with Twan from https://vanderpoelsoftware.com Example Dashboard, populated with data up to march-2023: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16RRvQJZ6VEyAF_Gm4DDPtE200esXTlSM/view?usp=share_link 14d trial version of Tableau: https://tableau.com/products/desktop/downloadA special thanks to Andrew Bridgen who alerted me to Wouter Aukema’s work. If you appreciated this post, perhaps you might consider a paid subscription so I can continue creating more content like this. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

In the last interview I gave to the BBC, they asked me, why are you sacrificing your career on the hill of vaccine harms?And I said, that's because that's the hill you're killing my people on.In this compelling interview with Andrew Bridgen, Independent Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire, he shares his struggles in being an almost solitary advocate in the UK Parliament on various critical issues. These include Covid-19 experimental vaccine harms, excess mortality rates, opposition to the WHO pandemic treaty, and proposed amendments to international health regulations. Bridgen also opens up about the personal toll of bringing attention to these pressing matters.Details about the event where world leading experts testified at the UK’s parlimentary office on December 4th, can be read below. Details about Bridgen’s first-adjourned debate on excess deaths, secured last October, can be read below. Details on the most recent debate on excess deaths can be read about below. If you appreciated this post, perhaps you might consider a paid subscription so I can continue creating more content like this. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

On April 18th, in the UK House of Commons, Andrew Bridgen, MP (Independent) for North West Leicestershire gave an uncompromising and hard-hitting speech on the debate that he brought forward: “Covid-19 pandemic response and trends in excess deaths.” Last October, my report “Piercing the Veil of Silence over Excess Deaths” covered Bridgen’s speech, after he secured a 30-minute adjourned debate on excess deaths in the lower house of Parliament.However, this debate went on for over two hours, where other MPs including Sir Christopher Chope, Danny Kruger and Neale Hanvey, also weighed in on their concerns over excess deaths and the link to mRNA COVID-19 injections- the group effectively doing more than piercing the silence on the topic. Similar to the October 20th debate, only roughly a dozen MPs bothered to be present. These included Sir Christoper Chope, Philip Hollobone, Dr Kieran Mullan, Danny Kruger, Wera Hobhouse, Neale Hanvey, Stephen Metcalfe, Andrew Gwynne, Graham Stringer, Sir Peter Bottomley, and the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Maria Caulfield. Bridgen, who led the debate, opened with a powerful statement:We are witnesses to the greatest medical scandal in this country, in living memory and possibly ever! The excess deaths in 2022 and 2023- is that scandal. Its causes are complex but the novel and untested medical treatment described as a COVID vaccine is a large part of the problem. I've been called an anti-vaxxer as if I rejected these vaccines based on some ideology. I want to say clearly and unequivocally that I am not. I am in fact double vaccinated and vaccine harmed.Hiding the dataThe MP for North West Leicestershire since 2010, went on to state: You don't need any science training at all to be horrified by officials deliberately hiding key data in this scandal and that's exactly what's going on Madam deputy speaker. The office of National Statistics used to release weekly data on deaths per 100,000 in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, it no longer does that and no one will explain- why the public has a right to that data!There have been calls from serious experts whose requests I have amplified repeatedly in this house for what's called- record level data to be anonymized and disclosed for analysis. This would allow meaningful analysis of the deaths after vaccination and settle the issue of whether these experimental treatments are responsible for the increase in excess deaths once and for all. More extensive and detailed data has already been released to the pharma companies from publicly funded bodies. Jenny Harries, head of the UK Health Security Agency said “this anonymised aggregate death by vaccination status is commercially sensitive and shouldn't be published”- the public is being denied this data- this is unacceptable, Madam deputy speaker. Yet again data is hidden with impunity- just like the post office scandal.Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Manipulating the dataBridgen went on to explain how the Office of National Statistics (ONS) had recently changed the way they were calculating excess deaths.He stated:Professor Harries has also endorsed a recent massive change in the calculation of the baseline population level used by the ONS to calculate excess deaths. It's incredibly complex and opaque and by sheer coincidence it now appears to show that there's a massive excess of deaths in 2020 and 2021 and now a minimal excess deaths in 2023 under the old calculation method. Under the old calculation method, tried and tested for decades, the excess death rate in 2023 was an astonishing 5%, long after the pandemic was over and when you would expect a deficit in deaths because so many people had sadly died in previous years. 20,000 premature deaths are now being airbrushed away in 2023 with a new normal baseline.The controversial ONS calculation change is explained in great detail in a video by Dr John Campbell. The DNRsOne of the great scandals in the early Covid response saga was the fact that countless DNRs targeting the elderly and those with certain disabilities were enacted by GPs and hospital doctors across the UK.Bridgen explained:In March 2020, the government conducted a consultation exercise on whether people over a certain age or with certain disabilities should have a Do Not Resuscitate orders imposed upon them, known as DNRs. A document summarising the proposals were circulated to doctors and hospitals and this was mistakenly treated as formal policy by a number of care homes and GPs up and down the country who enacted it at the same time multiple hospitals introduced a policy that they would not admit patients with DNRs because they thought that they'd be overwhelmed. The result is that people died who didn't need to die- while nurses performed Tick Tock dances.The abandonment of standard clinical protocolsWhat actually kills people is that some people, especially the vulnerable, have an excessive immune response. Doctors have been treating this for decades with steroids and antibiotics for secondary pneumonia infections and other standard protocols but this time, even though the virus was long gone, doctors abandoned the standard clinical protocols because COVID was a new virus- no it wasn't. They sent people home told them to take paracetamol until their lips turn blue and then when they returned to hospital they sedated them put them on ventilators and watched them die.NICE’s NG163 ‘death’ protocol: midazolam & morphineAnother great scandal in the Covid response was the introduction of midazolam and morphine, as part of NICE’s NG163 protocol.If they [patients] were not fit for that level of care [placed on a ventilator] they were given end of life medication including midazolam and morphine. The body responsible for this protocol NG163, which was published on the 3rd of April 2020, is called the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).Giving midazolam and morphine to people dying of cancer, is reasonable but there is a side effect. The side effect is that these drugs have a respiratory depressant effect. It's hard to imagine Madam Deputy Speaker a more stupid thing to do than to give a respiratory suppression to somebody struggling to breathe already with symptoms of COVID-19 but that is exactly what we did. So, can the minister explain why midazolam was then removed from the same updated guideline NG191, on the 30th of November 2023? As it was removed, is it now considered and admitted that it was a mistake to ignore the warnings of so many experts, including that specific drug midazolam in NG163, when it was introduced? It's been confirmed in letters from ministers to families who lost loved ones down to this protocol. Ministers are announcing that doctors and nurses should have treated the individual patient with their own knowledge rather than strictly following NICE guideline NG163. If legal cases are brought for unlawful killing, can the minister tell us who's going to be taking the blame? Will it be NICE? Will it be NHS England or will it be the individual doctors and nurses who will be held to account? Interestingly, Madam Deputy Speaker, NICE has now removed these alternative protocols, including NG163 from their website, although every other historic protocol is still there for historical reference. Will the minister tell us why NICE have removed this protocol from their website? Are the ashamed of the harm that they caused? They certainly should be.Upon doing further research on NG163, I came across a rapid response letter to the editor of The BMJ, written by Professor Emeritus Sam H Ahmedzai, from the University of Sheffield and a group of consultants in palliative medicine, who raised concerns about the use of morphine and midazolam. In their letter, the doctors write:NG163 states: “Sedation and opioid use should not be withheld because of a fear of causing respiratory depression.” If COVID-19 infection were uniformly fatal, this would be an acceptable statement. But for people not previously known to be at the end of life, there is potential risk of unintended serious harm, if these medications are used incorrectly and without the benefit of specialist palliative care advice.They went on to call for a revision to NG163 based on their concerns.However, as current or retired consultants in palliative medicine, we respectfully suggest that some recommendations in NG163 should be revised to prevent inadvertently adding to that suffering.The doctors’ letter was published on 19 May 2020 with NICE ignoring their warnings. Neither “safe”, nor “effective” Turning back to Bridgen’s speech, he raised a further salient point:After a positive COVID test any illness and any death was attributed to the virus after the experimental emergencies vaccine was administered no subsequent illness and no death was ever attributed to the vaccine. These are both completely unscientific approaches…because with COVID-19 vaccines the media, the government and other authorities turned into big pharma’s marketing department and it's very hard now to hear the word “safe” without the echo of the word “effective” but they're not safe and effective.He went on to report: These so-called vaccines were the least effective vaccines ever. Is there anyone left under any illusion that they prevented any infections? When he was at the Dispatch Box for Prime Minister’s questions on 31 January, even the Prime Minister, in answer to my question, could not bring himself to add “and effective” to his “safe” mantra. In his own words, he was “unequivocal” that the vaccines are “safe”. The word “safe” means without risk of death or injury. Why is the Prime Minister gaslighting the 163 successful claims made to the vaccine damage payment scheme, totalling £19.5 million in compensation for harm caused by the covid vaccines? Have these people not suffered enough already? Those 163 victims are the tip of the iceberg, by the way. It also should be noted that the maximum payment is only £120,000, so each of those 163 victims got the maximum possible award, which should tell us something. The same compensation scheme paid out a total of only £3.5 million between 1997 and 2005, with an average of only eight claims per year, and that is for all claims for the entire country for all vaccines administered. So much for “safe”.Scottish MP, Neale Hanvey (Alba party) shared important published scientific evidence on the harms of the mRNA vaccines and excess deaths. He also referenced the alarming findings of Professor of Oncology, Angus Dalgleish.Let me move on to what we know about some of the issues surrounding mRNA technology. We know that it does not replicate locally, as we were assured it would do on launch. It metastasises to distant tissue, and replicates spike protein systemically distant from the site of administration. That is problematic for a number of reasons. According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood.Let me give a couple of examples. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is one of the principal causes of blood clot formation, which can cause stroke, pulmonary emboli, and other cardiac-related events including heart attacks, all of which can be life-limiting or fatal. Another antibody linked to the spike protein exerts an effect on myelin, and is associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome and transverse myelitis, which is a swelling around the spinal cord. Professor Dalgleish believes that that constitutes medical negligence, because the facts are there for all to see. He contends that many deaths are as a direct result of unnecessary vaccination. Furthermore, he advises that there are a greater number of yellow cards in MHRA for covid vaccines than for all other vaccines recorded, and nothing has really been done.” I will canter through some important published evidence, which comes back to the correlation/causation discussion. In a 2021 study looking at cardiac inflammatory markers in patients receiving mRNA vaccines, Steven Gundry observed that mRNA vaccination numerically increased markers “previously described by others for denoting inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle” in a patient population receiving the vaccine. A 2022 study by Fraiman et al. noted that the “excess risk of serious adverse events” identified in their study pointed “to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses”. That suggestion is wholly consistent with the principles set out in the declaration of Helsinki and is an ethical imperative.In 2023, a pre-print Lancet study by Nicolas Hulscher et al., including leading cardiologist Peter McCullough and Yale epidemiologist Harvey Risch, reviewed 325 autopsies after covid vaccination and found that 74% of the deaths were attributable to the vaccine. That study, which was published online, was then swiftly removed, allegedly for issues with ideological rigour.I wonder whether it was the MHRA that did the assessment of its rigour. Surely those data and findings—however problematic some of the methodology might have been— demand further scrutiny, not removal.A December 2023 Lancet Regional Health study by Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard et al. examined excess mortality in England post the covid-19 pandemic and the implications for secondary prevention. It stated: “Many countries, including the UK, have continued to experience an apparent excess of deaths long after the peaks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. Numbers of excess deaths estimated in this period are considerable.” It noted that “overall trends tend to be consistent across the various methods.”It continued: “The causes of these excess deaths are likely to be multiple…Further analysis by cause and by age- and sex-group may help quantifythe relative contributions of these causes.”I ask again: should we not at least be curious about this?The study continued: “The greatest numbers of excess deaths in the acute phase of the pandemic were in older adults. The pattern now is one of persisting excess deaths which are most prominent in relative terms in middle-aged and younger adults, with deaths from CVD causes and deaths in private homes being most affected.” That is a completely different clinical picture. It continued: “Timely and granular analyses are needed to describe such trends and so to inform prevention and disease management efforts.”Documents recently disclosed as part of a freedom of information lawsuit against the US Food and Drug Administration indicate that the agency was aware that the safety monitoring system for Pfizer’s covid-19 vaccine was “not sufficient” for assessing associated heart conditions when it licensed the company’s vaccine. Those documents also reveal numerous manufacturing concerns with Pfizer batches that were released to the public and show that the FDA knew about a phenomenon known as vaccine- associated enhanced diseases in those who were vaccinated and experienced breakthrough covid-19.Lastly, Bridgen concluded the debate with the following statement.I wish this debate were not needed; I wish the experimental covid-19 vaccines were safe and effective, but they are not. The longer we go on not admitting the problem, the bigger the problem that will come, and the greater the harm that will continue to be caused. Those in this House can continue to deny that the vaccines are causing harm and deaths, and the legacy media can continue to censor all reports of vaccine harms and excess deaths, but the people know, in increasing numbers, because they are the ones who are losing their loved ones and relatives. I urge the Government: release the control-level data, and let us sort this out once and for all.It must be noted that at the end of Bridgen’s first address (seen in the video above) there was an eruption of deafening applause and cheers from the packed, upper public gallery. This quickly prompted Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton) to try and put a stop to it.“No, no, we will have to clear the Gallery if clapping continues; I will order it, if necessary,” she states with annoyance. No, Madam Deputy Speaker- you can’t ever order it to stop- the people are knowing in ever-increasing numbers. If you find value in the work I do, consider upgrading to a paid subscription or make a one-off contribution. Your support helps me to continue investigating! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

On April 1, the Texas Department of State Health Services reported the first human case of novel avian influenza A(H5N1) in Texas. “The patient became ill following contact with dairy cows presumed to be infected with avian influenza,” the health alert stated. Just when news is breaking of a novel avian virus appears to be transmitting to humans, I recently found recorded material I thought was lost- my interview with former US Marine Corps, WMD defense professional, Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c) from late 2022. Even though the interview was conducted in late 2022, Rixey presciently discusses the origin of H5N1. Rixey’s insights shared in the interview, provide valuable context for understanding the complex and contentious discussions surrounding the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and related issues such as gain-of-function research (research that improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease).In early 2021, Rixey joined the online group of researchers, microbiologists, and geneticists called DRASTIC, which was formed with the aim of unearthing the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Please consider upgrading to a paid subscription to support the ongoing production of reports like this.In the 1-hour interview, Rixey explains how the infamous DEFUSE proprosal from 2018, submitted to DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) by the New York City-based non-profit organisation at the centre of the storm surrounding the Covid origin story, EcoHealth Alliance- was leaked to him. Later, Rixey published the highly confidential document on DRASTIC’s website in the fall of 2021, placing it in the public domain, where hundreds of news stories were written about it. The proposal contained damning information pertaining to gain-of-function work in collaboration with China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology and the well known US-based gain of function scientist, Ralph Baric, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. DARPA ultimately refused funding for the intended project which planned to engineer a virus that resembles SARS-CoV-2, deeming it “too risky.”In recent news, it was announced on April 4th that EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak will testify publicly before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, regarding the origins of Covid-19 and gain-of-function research on May 1. Chairman, Brad Wenstrup will lead the hearing and ask Daszak questions about his nonprofit’s relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.During the interview, Rixey discusses the controversial Pradhan et al. paper, which raised eyebrows by identifying HIV-like inserts in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. This finding fueled speculation about the engineered or manipulated origins of the virus.He also presents an HIV origin hypothesis, suggesting a connection between the HIV virus and a botched polio vaccine administered in Sub-Saharan Africa during the 1950s and 60s.A follow-up interview will be released shortly. Support independent investigative journalism by becoming a paid subscriber or make a one-off contribution. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

In case you missed it, I was invited on to Redacted to discuss a report I wrote last month on France’s new controversial ‘Pfizer Amendment’ law. You can watch the interview segment above based on my report below. Support independent investigative journalism by becoming a paid subscriber or make a one-off contribution! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Tom Haviland presents damning results from his worldwide blood clot survey on whether embalmers have observed a phenomenon of “large white fibrous clots” and “micro-clotting” extracted from corpses in recent years. Support independent investigative journalism by becoming a paid subscriber or make a one-off contribution!Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Denis Rancourt, PhD, has written over 100 papers and has held post-doctoral research positions at prestigious institutions in France and The Netherlands, before being a physics professor and lead scientist at the University of Ottawa for 23 years.On September 17, the non-profit, CORRELATION, published a report, co-authored by Rancourt, entitled ‘COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere.’The paper is based on the data from 17 countries in the Southern Hemisphere and equatorial region. The researchers found a causal link between many peaks in all-cause mortality and vaccine rollouts. The authors were able to quantify the fatal toxicity risk per injection, which dramatically increased for the elderly.Furthermore, the authors stated in their paper:‘We quantify the overall all-ages vDFR [vaccine dose fatality rate] for the 17 countries to be (0.126 ± 0.004) %, which would imply 17.0 ± 0.5 million COVID-19 vaccine deaths worldwide, from 13.50 billion injections up to 2 September 2023. This would correspond to a mass iatrogenic event that killed (0.213 ± 0.006) % of the world population (1 death per 470 living persons, in less than 3 years), and did not measurably prevent any deaths.’Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

It was great to be invited back on TNT Radio live, this time I was on Digging Deeper with Darren Denslow. In the interview I discussed mRNA vaccines and their impact on breastfeeding, menstruation, fertility in women. If you value the work I’m doing, consider becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism! You can also make a one off contribution by buying me a coffee!Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

My interview with Dr Kim Biss was recorded in February 2023. In light of the renewed promotion of the mRNA shots for pregnant women by the UK’s Health Security Agency, I have republished this interview as a podcast episode. If you value the work I’m doing, consider becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism! You can also make a one off contribution by buying me a coffee!Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

In my 28 minute interview with Joshua Guetzkow, senior lecturer at Hebrew University, he discusses how Pfizer/BioNTech’s biological product injected into the arms of billions, was not the same one used in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine clinical trial. There’s been a “bait-and-switch”….In the interview, Guetzkow also refers to the fact how the regulators were aware of the drop in the RNA integrity of the commercial batches of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, compared to the clinical ones but simply lowered the standard just before emergency use authorisation was granted. In June 2022, I investigated the leaked European Medicines Agency emails which exposed this scandal in my original 2-part report for Trial Site News, which can be read here.You can read Guetzkow’s substack here.If you value the work I’m doing, consider becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism! You can also make a one off contribution by buying me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

I discuss with James Delingpole: alarming findings from my investigative reports on Pfizer’s FDA-released documents on their clinical and non-clinical trial data; the predatory Pfizer/BioNTech contracts and the scandolous leaked European Medicines Agency emails and other Pfizer/BioNTech related documents. If you value the work I’m doing, consider either becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism!Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Last Friday, I was interviewed by Rick Munn from TNT Radio Live on how key findings from my investigative report on the leaked European Medicines Agency emails, found its way to the European Parliament’s special committee hearing on COVID-19. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

The EcoHealth Alliance VP, turned whistle-blower spoke candidly about his tenure at the controversial organization, which has been at the centre of the Covid-origin lab leak theory, along with their partner, The Wuhan Institute of Virology.He referred to the document compiled by Renz Law LLC, comprising of Huff’s bombshell declarations made under oath.Huff, who is an expert in the field of bioterrorism and biosurveillance worked at EcoHealth Alliance from 2014-2016. He reviewed the research proposal "Understanding the risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" which was submitted to the NIH detailing gain of function virology work (without explicitly stating it!) which he attests led to the creation of SARS-CoV-2, even though a moratorium was put in place in the US since October, 2014, for this type of research being carried out. Huff spoke on the ‘grey areas’ of the moratorium, eg. it didn’t apply to existing applications.On Dec 19, 2017, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that they would resume funding gain-of-function experiments involving influenza, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.He warned Dr Peter Daszak, his former boss, about the biosafety and biosecurity risks but Daszak was extremely dismissive of his concerns. Huff went on to reveal the alarming fact- there was no biological security officer and institutional biosafety committee at EcoHealth Alliance (in direct violation of NIH guidelines).Huff claimed that Daszak lied to him about the nature of work that EcoHealth Alliance (originally named Wildlife Trust) performs. He was surprised to find out, once he started working there from Daszak that no conservation work was being carried out by the organisation. He was under the impression, this was an area EcoHealth Alliance was directly involved in, given their website states- ‘EcoHealth Alliance is a global nonprofit leading scientific research into the critical connections between human, animal and environmental health.’Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Listen to my interview with Jenin Younes, litigation counsel for New Civil Liberties Alliance, on her landmark lawsuit against the federal government over online censorship.Younes is representing four private plaintiffs: Jay Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, Aaron Kheriaty and Jill Hines in what will probably be known as one of the most important lawsuits ever filed, when it comes to online censorship.Bhattacharya and Kulldorff, two of the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, have come under intense fire by Big Tech censors. Shockingly, legal discovery has unveiled that the likes of Twitter and Facebook, acted under the direction of the Biden administration. The sprawling spread of federal-led censorship involves multiple government agencies, such as the CDC, DHS, HHS and the NIH.A recent victory in the court proceedings was won when the judge ordered discovery from both Anthony Fauci, director of NIAID and Chief Medical Advisor to President Biden and the White House's press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.If you value the work I’m doing, consider either becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism!Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

I had the pleasure of talking with Mike Fairclough, headteacher of state-funded West Rise Junior School in Eastbourne, who has been one of the very few UK voices in teaching, who has publicly spoken out against school closures and the mass rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines to children.Fairclough has been investigated twice regarding his outspoken views regarding the risks associated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Complaints were made against him, leading to the governing school board to formally investigate. Shockingly, Fairclough was later informed by one of the school governors that the complainant was part of an organised group, specifically targeting teaching professionals who were speaking out against the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines to children-with the agenda of removing them from the profession!Last week, Fairclough and some prominent doctors, such as Dr Claire Craig, Dr Tony Hinton and Dr Renee Hoenderkamp wrote an open letter to the new Bristish PM, Liz Truss, asking her to pause the Covid-19 vaccine rollout to children.If you value the work I’m doing, consider either becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism!Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

My highly revealing interview with Dr Jessica Rose exposes 'the off-the-charts' safety signals seen in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System)- the rise of unusual cancers; myocarditis particularly in young males; fertility and menstrual challenges faced by thousands of women.Dr Rose lists the shocking number of serious adverse event cases:Thrombosis 81,000Myocarditis 38,000Hospitalizations 300,000Liver problems 66,000Life altering injuries 31,000Disabilities 53,000Dr Rose goes into great detail discussing her explosive report on myocarditis adverse events in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in the US) which was mysteriously ‘withdrawn’ from Elsevier and Current Problems in Cardiology, just days before the controversial 26 Oct 2021, FDA’s VRBPAC meeting, which unanimously decided to grant emergency use authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for 5-11 year olds. This was despite Rose’s report, co-written with Dr Peter McCullough, which showed:* 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for the 12-15-year-old age group.* A fivefold increase in myocarditis rate was observed after dose 2 as opposed to dose 1 in 15-year-old males.(I wrote an investigative series on how the scientific journals have been censoring the science for Trial Site News, you can watch my interview with Dr Peter McCullough here.)Dr Rose discusses the dangerous properties of the toxic vaccinal and viral Spike Protein- such as the presence of the furin cleavage and super antigen sites, along with their implications.“We were lied to..” -Dr Rose exposes the many ways the public have been lied to regarding these mRNA injectable products, such as how the lipid nanoparticle encapsulated modified mRNA, biodistributes and bioaccumulates in the human body.In the interview, I ask Dr Rose about the controversial subject of the HIV peptide inserts in the SARS-Cov-2 virus, which was first discovered by Pradhan et al in India. Dr Rose also shines a light on a study which revealed the alarming fact that BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine) can be reverse transcribed intracellularly into human DNA and what the concerning implications of that could mean.Subscribe to Dr Jessica Rose’s substack and visit her website jessicauniverse.comIf you value the work I’m doing, consider becoming a paid subscriber and help support independent investigative journalism! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

My latest investigative report can be read in Trial Site News. You can also watch an excellent analysis of my report on Trial Site News’ YouTube channel.If you value the work that I’m doing consider becoming a paid subscriber or PayPal me. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

It was a pleasure to be invited back on to Sonia Poulton’s breakfast show, Rise with BNT (Brand New Tube), a great censorship-free video sharing platform.I discussed with Sonia my recent investigative reports on Covid-19 vaccines for pregnant women; Pfizer’s non-clinical overview report and the capture of regulatory authorities.To help me continue producing content like this, consider becoming a paid subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Read my investigative report on On what basis are pregnant women being encouraged to take the Pfizer vaccine?To help me continue producing content like this, consider becoming a paid subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

"All Covid interventions from masks to lockdowns cut to the core of what it is to be social and have a social community.”‘Reluctant freedom fighter’ and scientist, Mark Changizi PhD, shares his fascinating knowledge of cognitive science. He discusses the mass hysteria surrounding Covid; his legal action brought against the federal government on First Amendment grounds and his view that the old Left/Right political paradigm has shifted to economic and personal Freedoms (of the Right) vs Authoritarianism (of the Left).“This trend of the Left in moving to an anti-free expression side has been going on for quite a while.”Here’s a link to Mark’s work and platforms where you can follow him.To help me continue producing content like this, consider becoming a paid subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

“There has been an attack on fiat currencies for years but it appears to be gathering pace..which coincides with the introduction of CBDCs, within the same time-frame Covid-19 exits stage right.”To help support me in producing content like this, consider becoming a paid subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Listen to my interview with David Nolan, founder of StopCommonPass.Org on the introduction and implementation of digital IDs, where he warns about the dangers of the “centralization of data.”Ultimately, we’re looking at behavioural change and a westernized type of social credit system.Even though the pandemic is over, Nolan discusses the multi-million pound government contracts which are still being given to tech companies for developing and maintaining NHS Covid passes.This interview was recorded just before the French election and Nolan makes reference to Emmanuel Macron’s comment of reintroducing Covid status certification passes, “if he had to.”Days after winning the French presidential election, Macron launched digital IDs in France.To help me continue producing more content like this, consider becoming a paid subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

The consultant pathologist shares her insights with regards to Covid data, vaccines and more!I had the real pleasure of speaking with Dr Clare Craig, consultant pathologist, this week. In her revelatory conversation with me, Dr Craig shared some fascinating facets of her in-depth knowledge on what’s really been going on over the past two years.To help support me in continuing to produce content like this, consider becoming a paid substack subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Nick Hudson, the chairman of PANDA (pandemics- data and analytics) who is based in Cape Town, South Africa, gave his first interview with me, after his permanent suspension from Twitter yesterday. Hudson had amassed a Twitter following of 64,000, over the course of two years, before his comment on Ivermectin, as an early treatment for COVID-19 led to an instant permanent ban.To help support me in continuing to produce content like this, consider becoming a paid substack subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Read the written summary of the interview in Trial Site News Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

To help support me in producing content like this, consider becoming a paid substack subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

To help support me in continuing to produce content like this, consider becoming a paid substack subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Marc Girardot, PANDA member and bio-tech strategy consultant, discusses with me his informative articles on his substack, Covid Myth Buster.In our 2-hour conversation, Marc masterfully explains: cross immunity, how natural immunity is vastly superior to vaccine induced immunity; how the elderly were not protected by the vaccines; how the global response to Covid-19 was completely wrong; the myth of the infection fatality rate and the shockingly real dangers of the Covid-19 mRNA gene-therapy injections. Follow Marc on Twitter and subscribe to his substack. To help support me in continuing to produce content like this, consider becoming a paid substack subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

“Lockdowns are perhaps the worst type of centralised policy that you can imagine."-David ThunderTo watch the full video interview click here To help support me in continuing to produce content like this, consider becoming a paid substack subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

This interview was removed from YouTube in less than 24 hours. You can watch it here on my Brand New Tube channel. John Bowe talks to me about Covid censorship, the current ⁣political climate, suppression of early Covid treatment and his views on ⁣vaccine passports and more!To help support me in producing content like this, consider becoming a paying substack subscriber or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

⁣Mother of Maddie de Garay, speaks out about her 13 year old daughter’s life-altering injuries after taking the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine. In late July 2020, the US-based Pfizer-BioNTech phase 3 trial of adolescents aged 12-15 years began, 1131 were administered two-doses of the vaccine and 1129 were given a placebo. Maddie de Garay, aged 12 at the time, was one of the 1131. Stephanie, her mother, shares Maddie’s heart-breaking story of how her daughter can now barely see, suffers from tinnitus, mobility issues, vomiting, blood in her urine, numbness in her body and has at least 10-20 seizures a day. https://trialsitenews.com/mother-of-maddie-de-garay-speaks-out-about-her-13-year-old-daughters-life-altering-injuries-from-pfizers-covid-vaccine/ Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

I had the pleasure of speaking with Dr Pierre Kory, an ICU doctor and president of the FLCCC (Front-line Covid-19 Critical Care). Dr Kory exposes the shocking acts of censorship perpetrated by well-known scientific journals, characterised by the sudden removal of peer reviewed published papers showing statistically significant results for ivermectin as an effective early Covid-19 treatment and prophylaxis. He speaks about the "ludicrous" Covid vaccine mandates and the alarming capture of the journals where "only the scientific papers that get published are those that further the narrative." This interview forms the basis of Part 2 of my investigative series: Are the scientific journals censoring the Science? published in Trial Site News. 👇 Read the investigative reports here: Part 1 ⁣https://trialsitenews.com/are-....the-scientific-journ Part 2 ⁣https://trialsitenews.com/are-....the-scientific-journ Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

My interview with Dr Peter McCullough, expert cardiologist and epidemiologist, about the abrupt removal by Elsevier and Current Problems in Cardiology of his peer reviewed co-authored report showing the alarming spike in myocarditis cases connected with Covid mRNA jabs, in young males. This happened just before the US FDA approved the Pfizer jab in 5-11 year olds. This interview forms the basis of PART 1 of Sonia's intestigative series: Are the scientific journals censoring the Science? ⁣https://trialsitenews.com/are-....the-scientific-journ Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe