True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington filed a Rule 25(b)(2) motion on September 10, 2026, requesting that Judge William Sullivan enter a finding of Not Guilty by Reason of Lack of Criminal Responsibility on all charges against Lindsay Clancy. The motion is scheduled for hearing on September 29 at Plymouth County Superior Court — the same date as the status conference at which the Plymouth County District Attorney's office is expected to indicate whether it intends to seek a retrial.Defense attorney Bob Motta analyzes the legal basis of Reddington's filing. The motion argues that 11 of 12 jurors applied the reasonable doubt standard and concluded the prosecution did not prove criminal responsibility. Reddington concedes that a hung jury does not ordinarily terminate jeopardy but contends the holdout juror's reported admission of reasonable doubt, combined with his alleged refusal to follow the court's instructions, creates an argument that the mistrial was not a manifest necessity — potentially triggering double jeopardy protections.Motta examines the prosecution's position heading into the hearing. The Commonwealth's trial theory argued both that Clancy staged her suicide attempt and that she killed her children because she wanted to die. With eleven jurors reportedly rejecting that theory, the state faces a significant strategic question about whether to retry on the same basis.Reddington has publicly indicated willingness to negotiate a plea but stated he will not accept any agreement involving incarceration. The Plymouth County DA's office has a documented history of rarely entering plea agreements. Motta discusses the range of potential outcomes, including reduced charges, a bench trial on second-degree murder, and the practical obstacles to reaching a resolution when both sides have publicly staked out positions.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyCase #TrueCrimeToday #KevinReddington #TimCruz #Rule25 #PleaDeal #Mistrial #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta

The twelve-member jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial deliberated for over 38 hours across seven days before Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. The panel was split 11 to 1 in favor of acquittal by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. Foreperson Roni Carlson told NBC10 Boston that the lone holdout admitted to having reasonable doubt but stated he would not vote not guilty by reason of insanity.Defense attorney Bob Motta examines the procedural and legal framework surrounding the holdout juror's conduct. Kevin Reddington moved to have the juror removed, arguing the man was not following the court's instructions on reasonable doubt. Judge Sullivan declined the request. Reddington then filed an emergency appeal with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, contending the holdout's reasoning reflected bias against individuals with mental illness rather than a good-faith evaluation of the evidence. The SJC denied the appeal.Since the mistrial, juror Nick Dargie told ABC News the holdout could not identify any evidence or witness testimony supporting his position, reportedly would not engage with fellow jurors during deliberations, and spent time on his phone. Dargie also reported the holdout handled a piece of physical evidence from the case during deliberations.Motta analyzes the voir dire challenge both prosecution and defense face if the case proceeds to a second trial. Massachusetts law places the burden on the prosecution to disprove insanity beyond a reasonable doubt. Screening prospective jurors for bias against psychiatric defenses in a case where the sole contested issue is postpartum psychosis presents a procedural challenge with limited existing legal remedies.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #Mistrial #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #JurySystem #TrueCrime

Judge William Sullivan read Lindsay Clancy’s jury two instructions that cannot both be followed at the same time. One told them to follow the law whether they agreed with it or not. The other told them the verdict must be the result of their own convictions. Then a 175-year-old dynamite charge told the holdout to reconsider his doubt and also never to surrender his honest conviction.The jury split 11-1 after about 38 hours. The foreperson says the holdout admitted reasonable doubt and then refused to vote to acquit. Jurors highlighted the printed instructions and read the standard to him over and over. He couldn’t reconcile the law with the form.The criminal responsibility instruction asks civilians to parse a double-negative legal test the state’s own highest court says is too obscure to explain clearly. The verdict slip carried six options per child across three children. The instructions were written above a twelfth-grade reading level. The average American reads at an eighth-grade level.Status hearing September 29th. Cruz has not announced whether he’ll retry.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #JuryInstructions #Mistrial #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueJustice #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PlymouthCourt

Three of the most watched cases in the country delivered major developments in the same window. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke covers all three with a behavioral analyst's read on the people who enabled each disaster.Mica Miller reported surveillance, tracking, and harassment to police in the months before her death at a North Carolina state park on April 27, 2024. Her death was ruled a suicide. Her estranged husband, Myrtle Beach pastor JP Miller, now faces federal cyberstalking charges. He has pleaded not guilty. A Netflix documentary and proposed coercive control legislation in South Carolina have brought the case back into the national conversation.Lindsay Clancy's murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court ended in a mistrial after an 11-to-1 hung jury. The majority favored acquitting Clancy by reason of insanity. The holdout admitted he had reasonable doubt and refused to vote for acquittal. Jurors describe severe trauma from the evidence and frustration with one member's refusal to engage.The family of Celeste Rivas Hernandez filed a wrongful death lawsuit against D4vd that names his mother, his management team, and his business entities as defendants. The complaint alleges a system of enablement that kept a minor concealed. David Burke's celebrity attorneys withdrew from the criminal case. He has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and other charges.Dreeke identifies the behavioral thread connecting all three: what happens when the people closest to the situation become the reason it continues.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #LindsayClancy #D4vd #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #JPMiller #CelesteRivasHernandez #CoerciveControl #HungJury #TrueCrimePodcast

The first investigators to look at Sandra Birchmore's death called it suicide the same day they found her. A twenty-three-year-old pregnant woman with a duffel bag strap around her neck tied to a closet doorknob. No autopsy yet. No phone examined. No DNA compelled from the last person captured on surveillance entering her building.Federal prosecutors allege that person was Matthew Farwell — a Stoughton detective and union president who allegedly began a physical relationship with Sandra through the department's own youth program when she was fifteen.The department behind that investigation has a record that never made national news. On-duty shakedowns. Convicted chiefs. FBI wires. A deputy chief's compromising photos emailed to every officer and spouse. A sergeant's truck killing a seventy-four-year-old — the explanation a lemon seed — acquitted and back on duty.The FBI found Farwell's DNA on the ligature. Trial starts October 5 in Boston.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #StoughtonPD #FarwellTrial #PoliceMisconduct #FederalTrial #Massachusetts #TrueCrime

d4vd earned ten to eleven and a half million dollars between 2023 and 2025 — according to his former financial manager's testimony under oath. He now claims he can't afford a lawyer.Three private attorneys withdrew from Burke's defense on August 31, the same day he pleaded not guilty. The court appointed a public defender.That week, Celeste Rivas Hernandez's parents filed a wrongful death lawsuit naming ten defendants — including Burke's mother, his manager, and his live-in security guard.The family's attorney pointed to three companies Burke owns — D4VD Entertainment, Skullrose Merchandise, Headspace Publishing — and alleges he transferred assets to his mother.Colleen Burke allegedly served as her son's finance director for a year, a signatory on his accounts. She is now named as a defendant — twelve causes of action including human trafficking and false imprisonment.Billions of streams. Ten million dollars. And a public defender.Next court date: October 19.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#d4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #TrueCrimeToday #DavidBurke #ColleenBurke #WrongfulDeath #TrueCrime #d4vdCase #d4vdArrest #JusticeForCeleste

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial ended the way no one in that courtroom expected. After seven weeks of testimony and seven days of deliberation, the jury at Plymouth Superior Court was deadlocked 11-to-1. The majority wanted to acquit Clancy by reason of insanity. The lone holdout had other plans.Foreperson Roni Carlson is now describing what happened inside that room. She told NBC Boston the holdout admitted he had reasonable doubt after watching recorded evidence. Carlson started filling out the verdict forms. Three pages, three signatures. Then the holdout said he still would not vote to acquit.The jurors sent a note to Judge William Sullivan alleging the holdout was refusing to follow the court's instructions on reasonable doubt. Sullivan brought each juror to the bench individually. He re-read the standard. Nothing changed. Reddington moved to remove the holdout. Sullivan denied it. The trial ended in a mistrial.Other jurors described the holdout as dismissive of medical testimony. Nurses on the jury tried to explain the medication evidence. He disregarded them. Juror Paula Devlin called him arrogant.Lindsay Clancy was charged with first-degree murder in the January 24, 2023 deaths of her children Cora, Dawson, and Callan. The defense argued postpartum psychosis.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke assesses the behavioral psychology of jury holdouts, the toll of secondary trauma on deliberation, and what happens to the pursuit of justice when one person's refusal to engage overwhelms eleven people's good faith.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #HungJury #RobinDreeke #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

The people closest to Mica Miller's marriage were the same people who enabled its alleged dynamics. Solid Rock Church in Myrtle Beach was JP Miller's platform and Mica Miller's community. When Mica began telling police she was being stalked, tracked, and harassed, the congregation did not rally around her. They closed ranks around JP.Mica filed police reports describing GPS surveillance, razor blades in her tires, and a man she said she was afraid of. She told friends she was living in an invisible cage. On April 27, 2024, she was found dead at Lumber River State Park in North Carolina. Her death was ruled a suicide. She had served JP with divorce papers two days earlier. She was 30 years old.JP Miller preached at her memorial service. He spoke about her body from the pulpit. Witnesses called it possessive and chilling.Federal prosecutors have charged JP Miller with cyberstalking Mica and making false statements to investigators. The indictment alleges he contacted her more than 50 times in a single day. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all allegations.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke examines how a congregation becomes complicit in a pattern of coercive control, what drives community members to side with a charismatic leader over the person asking for help, and what the behavioral markers in this case reveal about the psychology of institutional failure.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #HiddenKillers #CoerciveControl #RobinDreeke #SolidRockChurch #DeathOfThePastorsWife #MicasLaw #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

Mica Miller packed her lunch, put on work clothes, and talked to her divorce attorney about starting over. That was Friday evening, April 26, 2024. By Saturday afternoon, she’d bought a gun she’d never fired and driven to Lumber River State Park in North Carolina. Her sandwich was still in the car.Solid Rock Church pastor JP Miller was confirmed in South Carolina at the time. He’s not charged with her death. He’s charged with eighteen months of cyberstalking — tracking devices, intimate images posted without consent, and false statements to the FBI. His federal trial starts next month.Before she died, Mica told a friend exactly what she feared JP would do — and exactly what he would tell people afterward. That friend went on camera for Netflix’s Death of the Pastor’s Wife and repeated it word for word.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #HiddenKillers #SolidRockChurch #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #TrueCrime #MyrtleBeach #CyberStalking #FederalTrial

JP Miller D4vd true crime — they operated in different worlds. One ran a church in Myrtle Beach. The other topped music charts. Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer says the alleged pattern underneath is the same: adults who reportedly could have acted and allegedly chose not to.JP Miller faces federal trial in October 2026 on cyberstalking and false statements charges. Prosecutors allege he tracked Mica Miller, deployed a tire deflation device, and posted an intimate image without consent. Before the marriage, he led her youth worship, officiated her first wedding, and employed her.Celeste Rivas Hernandez was fourteen. Her family filed a wrongful death lawsuit on September 8, 2026, naming D4vd alongside his mother, manager, security guard, and business entities.Coffindaffer analyzes how positions of trust allegedly become instruments of harm.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBI #TrueCrime #WrongfulDeath #CoerciveControl

Barry Morphew's GPS monitor told the whole story. On August 26, 2026, the man awaiting trial for his wife's murder wasn't at work. He was at a steakhouse, a Whole Foods, downtown Denver, and Denver International Airport — none of it authorized. Then he allegedly hit two cars near Cherry Creek, offered the driver cash, and fled. Prosecutors say the monitoring company had given him a roaming window the judge never approved and never checked whether he showed up to a job site. The judge raised his bond to ten million cash-only and said he shows no respect for any order of her court. Barry had already lived under fake names in Arizona and forged his missing wife's ballot. Every move he makes to avoid scrutiny becomes the reason scrutiny tightens.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #HiddenKillers #BondRevoked #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #Colorado #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimeCommunity #CriminalJustice

D4vd finances Celeste Rivas Hernandez — Burke's former financial manager testified at a preliminary hearing to earnings between ten and eleven and a half million dollars from recording contracts, merchandise, and publishing.He also testified he advised Burke to transfer two Texas properties into his mother's name to shield assets. Those transfers happened in October 2025, weeks after fourteen-year-old Celeste's remains were discovered.On September 8, 2026, Celeste's parents filed a twelve-count wrongful death lawsuit naming Burke, his mother Colleen Burke, manager Josh Marshall, security guard Sheldon Jacques, and business entities. The family alleges Burke used his wealth to gain access to a minor and surrounding adults failed to intervene.Burke fired his legal team and requested a public defender. He is held without bail.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down the financial trail.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #WrongfulDeath #Lawsuit #JusticeForCeleste #DavidBurke #Murder #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers

The holdout in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial told the room he didn’t know whether the prosecution or the defense had proved their case. Under the instructions Judge Sullivan read that jury, the defense had no burden to prove anything.Nick Dargie, a 25-year-old military veteran and the most recent juror to speak publicly, said the holdout couldn’t point to any evidence supporting his position and scrolled his phone while other jurors deliberated. He described the holdout pulling an exercise band from the evidence bag, tying it around a water bottle, and pulling it tight — an apparent reenactment Dargie called disgusting.The foreperson signed three verdict forms after the holdout admitted reasonable doubt. He reversed himself in the same breath. The jury split 11-1 after about 38 hours of deliberation.Reddington has filed a motion asking the court to enter an acquittal. Cruz has not announced whether he’ll retry. A hearing is set for September 29.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #HoldoutJuror #Mistrial #ReasonableDoubt #JuryInstructions #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

JP Miller timeline — Mica Miller met the man who would become her husband when she was a teenager at his youth ministry in Myrtle Beach. Netflix's Death of the Pastor's Wife exposed the timeline.JP led youth worship at Solid Rock Church. Mica was among his congregants. He was fifteen years her senior. When she married her first husband, Jeremy, JP officiated. After that marriage ended, Mica worked for JP. In 2015, when she was twenty and JP was thirty-five, he confessed from his pulpit to "a moral failing." Both marriages ended. JP set the terms. They married in November 2017.Mica died at Lumber River State Park on April 27, 2024, at thirty. JP faces federal trial in October 2026 on cyberstalking and false statements charges.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down the methodology.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #CoerciveControl #SolidRockChurch #Pastor #RedFlags #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime

JP Miller true crime — the former Solid Rock Church pastor from Netflix's Death of the Pastor's Wife faces federal charges for allegedly cyberstalking Mica Miller and lying to the FBI. Trial is set for October 2026.The indictment alleges Miller used GPS surveillance, deployed a tire deflation device, and made over fifty calls to Mica in one day. Prosecutors also allege he posted an intimate image without consent.Miller told investigators he hired a PI to prevent Mica from buying firearms. The government says that was a lie.Mica died on April 27, 2024, at Lumber River State Park. She had reported harassment to local police. The case stalled until the Robeson County Sheriff's Office requested FBI involvement.Miller pleaded not guilty and posted $100,000 bond.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer analyzes the federal case.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #FBI #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #SolidRockChurch #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime

A mistrial usually resets a case. Lindsay Clancy’s left prosecutors with a reported 11-1 split and a public statement from DA Tim Cruz defending the theory jurors could not unanimously accept. Cruz described the deaths as the “cruel and calculated killing of three innocents” and said the evidence suggested to his office that Clancy was in control. Judge William Sullivan declared the mistrial September 4 after jurors deliberated for more than 38 hours across seven days. Kevin Reddington says eleven jurors favored acquittal. That figure comes from the defense, and no verdict was returned. The underlying legal divide remains the same: the defense attributed Clancy’s actions to postpartum psychosis and lack of criminal responsibility, while the prosecution argued she understood the wrongfulness of her conduct and could choose differently. Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski with experience on both sides of a criminal courtroom. He examines how prosecutors evaluate a failed first trial, what juror feedback can reveal, when expert testimony needs rebuilding, and how a district attorney weighs retrial against a plea or another resolution. Cruz has authority to try the case again. The first jury still gave his office a result it has to evaluate before choosing that path. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the social fallout that followed the same trial. She focuses on the fear underneath the public argument over postpartum psychosis and why people reach for labels that create distance from severe mental illness. Scott also considers what the public spectacle may communicate to mothers who are afraid to disclose disturbing symptoms. Patrick Clancy’s attorney has said another trial would be extraordinarily painful for him and his family. Cruz has not announced his decision. Both sides are scheduled to return to court September 29, where the legal consequences of the mistrial begin taking shape. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #TimCruz #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #Mistrial #Retrial #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeNews 

The Lindsay Clancy holdout controversy centers on what the jury foreperson allegedly reported to the court, not simply on a juror voting differently. Kevin Reddington said the foreperson identified one juror who acknowledged doubt but would not apply Judge William Sullivan’s instruction on reasonable doubt. That distinction mattered because jurors are allowed to disagree, including as a minority of one. Sullivan questioned jurors about their ability to follow the law and repeated the legal standard, but he declined Reddington’s request to remove the holdout. Seven days and more than 38 hours of deliberations ended with a September 4 mistrial. The legal fallout did not stay inside Plymouth Superior Court. On September 8, Howard Cooper, attorney for Patrick Clancy, said online creators had spread false claims accusing Patrick of involvement in the deaths of his children. Cooper warned that appropriate legal measures would be pursued and said law enforcement had been notified. Robin Dreeke, former FBI counterintelligence behavioral expert, joins Tony Brueski to separate the observable group dynamics from speculation about what a single juror believed. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, explains why judges protect the secrecy and independence of deliberations even when other jurors report a problem. Faddis then turns to the accusations involving Patrick and the legal exposure that can arise when commentary makes provably false factual claims about an identifiable person. The combined discussion follows two lines courts guard carefully: the independence of a juror and the boundary between protected speech and actionable defamation. Lindsay Clancy’s next scheduled court date is September 29 while prosecutors consider whether to retry the case. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #JuryDeadlock #ReasonableDoubt #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #DefamationCase #CourtroomCoverage #TrueCrimePodcast 

Lindsay Clancy's mistrial ended one jury fight and immediately opened several others, including Kevin Reddington's public request for President Donald Trump to help his client. A president cannot pardon a defendant on Massachusetts state charges, but Reddington has said he made the appeal because any help could matter while prosecutors decide whether to retry her. The pressure campaign is tied to the defense's view of how the first trial went wrong. Medical witnesses described Clancy's neck and wrist cuts as superficial. Her fall from the home caused a spinal injury that left her paralyzed, and Reddington argued the state had tried to minimize the seriousness of the overall attempt. After seven days and roughly 38 hours of deliberation, Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4. Reddington has said the jury was divided 11-1 in favor of acquittal based on lack of criminal responsibility, a split later echoed by jurors speaking publicly. District Attorney Timothy Cruz has not announced a retrial decision. An emergency Supreme Judicial Court request over the holdout juror was denied, and a spectator was arrested after allegedly filming jurors outside the courthouse. The defense is also asking Sullivan for a required finding of not guilty under Rule 25. The September 29 hearing is scheduled to address that request along with status and trial assignment. If the motion fails and prosecutors continue, both sides will have to decide how much the first jury's reported split changes the next trial or any negotiation. Bob Motta of Defense Diaries and defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis join Tony Brueski to work through the fallout. They examine the disputed injury strategy, the mistrial record, the Rule 25 standard, and Reddington's refusal to accept a resolution requiring jail time. They also explain why the defense sought presidential attention while the charging decision remains with a Massachusetts district attorney. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #EricFaddis #ClancyMistrial #Rule25 #MassachusettsCourt #LegalBreakdown #TrueCrimePodcast

The Dan Markel murder-for-hire case turned a jailhouse notebook into evidence against Donna Adelson. Drina Bernhardt testified that Donna wrote a question-and-answer script meant to feed Bernhardt false testimony about Katherine Magbanua, and a state handwriting analyst testified that the writing belonged to Donna. Donna had been arrested one week after Charlie's 2023 conviction as she and Harvey prepared to travel to Vietnam on one-way tickets. Bernhardt said Donna promised $10,000 and a grand piano if she helped. Donna's attorneys challenged the witness and argued Bernhardt pushed Donna to write the material so Bernhardt could help herself. A second jailhouse witness also testified that Donna confessed and discussed false testimony, while the defense highlighted inconsistencies in that account. At sentencing, Donna maintained her innocence and told Judge Stephen Everett she had never received a parking ticket. Prosecutors paired the jailhouse evidence with 44 checks Donna signed to Magbanua after the murder. They argued the payments connected Donna to the conspiracy. The defense said Donna was following Charlie's instructions because he claimed Magbanua and others were extorting him. The jury convicted Donna after roughly three hours of deliberation. Wendi Adelson remains uncharged, and Jeffrey Lacasse's testimony creates a separate factual conflict. Lacasse said Wendi told him five days before Markel was shot that Charlie had considered "all options" for the "Danny Markel problem," including hiring a hitman for about $15,000. Wendi denied making that statement. Lacasse also testified that Wendi questioned him about his Friday route in the days before the killing and later asked him not to contact her for a week. Wendi testified that the television being repaired at her home on the morning of the murder was not code. She also acknowledged seeing police tape near Markel's home without calling Markel or the children's daycare. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #DanMarkel #DonnaAdelson #TrueCrimeToday #WendiAdelson #JeffreyLacasse #AdelsonFamily #MurderForHire #TrialEvidence #Florida #TrueCrime 

Nick Reiner and Lindsay Clancy are now sharing space in the same public argument: when does mental illness explain conduct, and when does the evidence still point toward criminal responsibility? Their cases reach that question through very different records. Reiner faces two murder charges for the deaths of his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, and has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors also allege special circumstances for multiple murders and lying in wait. Reiner had spoken publicly for years about addiction and recovery, describing repeated treatment, homelessness, relapses, and destructive behavior during drug use. Those statements provide history, but they do not establish his state of mind at the time of the charged killings. Clancy's state of mind was the central issue at her Massachusetts trial. Her lawyers argued postpartum psychosis made her not criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. The prosecution presented experts who disputed that conclusion and argued she could understand that her actions were wrong. The jury deadlocked, producing a September 4 mistrial. Jurors later described an 11-1 split in favor of an insanity verdict. The public response has moved beyond legal standards. A TikTok creator claimed he called off a $200,000 wedding after his fiancee disagreed with him about Clancy and called her a monster. The dispute turned a murder trial into a test of whether compassion for a defendant reveals something unacceptable about the person expressing it. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski to examine that leap. They compare what addiction can do to judgment with what psychosis can do to a person's perception of reality, while keeping the legal allegations separate. They also examine why audiences reach for simple labels when the actual question is whether a specific defendant had the capacity required for criminal responsibility at a specific moment. Reiner is scheduled to return to court September 15. Clancy still faces charges after the mistrial. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NickReiner #LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #ShavaunScott #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #MentalHealthDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility

Patrick Clancy's lawyer says there may be consequences for people spreading false claims that Patrick was involved in the deaths of his children. Howard Cooper's September 8 statement said law enforcement had been notified and described an escalating defamation campaign that had produced threats to Patrick's reputation, livelihood and life. The public record has not implicated Patrick in the deaths of Cora, Dawson and Callan. The warning arrived after Lindsay Clancy's trial ended in a mistrial on September 4. Patrick had testified as the Commonwealth's first witness and described Lindsay's decline, the errands that took him away from the house, his return home and the 911 call. Lindsay's lawyers acknowledged that she killed the children while arguing that severe mental illness left her without criminal responsibility. The prosecution argued the acts were deliberate. Outside court, another case was being built without charges, rules of evidence or a judge. Patrick's move to New York, his remarriage and his decision to forgive Lindsay were picked apart online. Kevin Reddington was then asked about the conspiracy theories and said Patrick had not been accused by him. He also said he did not dismiss internet investigators and praised social-media users for finding facts and doing investigations. Tony Brueski is joined by retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott to examine why unsupported accusations can feel persuasive once a community decides someone looks suspicious. Dreeke focuses on the behavioral shortcuts that make a theory self-reinforcing. Scott examines the expectation that grief must look permanent and publicly recognizable before strangers will accept it as genuine. Patrick rebuilt parts of his life after losing three children. His attorney is now challenging people who turned that survival into suspicion. Where does true-crime discussion end and a real-world campaign against a private person begin? Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #TrueCrimePodcast #OnlineConspiracies #Defamation #LindsayClancyTrial #TonyBrueski 

Timothy Hudson’s parents are fighting over child support while he waits for trial in the Anna Kepner cruise ship murder case. The new petition from Shauntel Hudson asks a Florida family court to address payments she says Thomas Hudson failed to make and to reconsider how much he should owe. Shauntel says Thomas once agreed to pay $2,129 each month for three children. The support amount later declined to $1,092 as fewer children remained covered. Her filing alleges that several months went unpaid and says Thomas earns more than the income reflected in the existing arrangement. Thomas disputes both assertions, and a judge has not decided the dispute. The money case is separate from Timothy’s federal prosecution, but the records expose the same fractured family environment his defense says it needs to investigate. His lawyers sought a continuance because they have not had the access to certain relatives they say is necessary to complete their work. They also must prepare for a Miller hearing, where the court examines a juvenile defendant’s background before a life-without-parole sentence could be imposed. U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom granted the unopposed request and moved the trial to November 2, 2026. The plea-agreement deadline is October 23. Timothy has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and an additional serious federal charge in Anna’s death aboard the Carnival Horizon. The federal case is asking for family history while the family case is producing allegations about money, parenting, and who was responsible for which child. The support dispute does not decide guilt or innocence. It documents another conflict among the relatives Timothy’s defense says it still needs to investigate before trial. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #TrueCrimeToday #ShauntelHudson #ThomasHudson #CarnivalHorizon #CruiseShipMurder #FederalTrial #ChildSupport #TrueCrimePodcast 

Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney says prosecutors never put a plea offer on the table before her first trial. Kevin Reddington’s claim matters because Clancy was indicted on three counts of first-degree murder, a charging decision that kept mandatory life without parole in play if jurors convicted her at that level.The defense asked jurors to find that postpartum psychosis left Clancy without criminal responsibility. Prosecutors argued that mental illness did not prevent her from understanding that her actions were wrong or from choosing differently. After seven days of deliberations, Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. The charges remain unresolved, and the next status hearing is scheduled for September 29.At the same time, Patrick Clancy and Lindsay Clancy are pursuing separate civil cases over the medical treatment that preceded the deaths of their three children. Patrick’s wrongful-death suit and Lindsay’s malpractice suit overlap on four defendants: Jennifer Tufts, Rebecca Jollotta, Aster Mental Health, and South Shore Health System. Lindsay’s case reaches further, naming additional clinicians and hospitals. Those filings allege poor coordination, missed warning signs, misdiagnosis, and a medication course that worsened her condition.Patrick’s complaint says eight different medications were prescribed within three weeks. Tony Brueski, Bob Motta, and Robin Dreeke connect the criminal and civil sides of the case and separate the legal questions each track must answer. One asks whether Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible.The other asks whether providers failed in the care they delivered before the deaths. With a possible retrial still hanging over the case, which form of accountability should matter most?Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #KevinReddington #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #MedicalMalpractice #PostpartumPsychosis #MassachusettsCourt #TrueCrime

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial ended a weeks-long trial with no verdict, yet the defense says the final divide was one vote away from acquittal. Kevin Reddington said eleven jurors favored finding Clancy not criminally responsible and a single holdout prevented a unanimous result. The jury had deliberated for more than 38 hours over seven days. Its foreperson raised a specific concern about the holdout's treatment of reasonable doubt, but Judge William Sullivan said he would not remove or further interrogate a juror based on the dispute presented to him. Reddington then took the issue to a single justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The emergency request failed, and Sullivan declared a mistrial. That did not end the defense effort to stop another prosecution. Reddington said he planned to seek a required finding of not guilty through a Rule 25 motion, asking Sullivan to dispose of the case without another jury. He pressed for a quick hearing and said he was ready to start over with jury selection if the judge denied the motion. Sullivan scheduled the next hearing for September 29, 2026, with any new trial dependent on the court's calendar and the prosecution's decision. Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta trace what that sequence means in practical terms. Bob addresses whether an 11-1 defense-reported split weakens the case for a retrial and what prosecutors would have to reassess after the first jury. He also explains why a new panel can reach a completely different outcome on largely unchanged evidence. District Attorney Timothy Cruz said he would review the case with his team before deciding whether to try Clancy again. Patrick Clancy's attorney said another trial would be "extraordinarily painful" for Patrick and his family. The next fight is no longer over the first jury's verdict. There was none. It is over whether the Commonwealth should ask a second jury for one. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #KevinReddington #Mistrial #HungJury #ClancyTrial #CriminalResponsibility #PatrickClancy #PossibleRetrial 

A custody ruling is where this entire case starts. A judge told Wendi Adelson she couldn't move her two sons away from their father, FSU law professor Dan Markel. Prosecutors say Wendi's mother, Donna Adelson, offered Markel a million dollars to undo that ruling. He said no. What happened next: two men drove five hours from Miami in a rented Prius and shot Markel twice in the head in his own garage, hours after he'd dropped his sons at preschool and gone to the gym. He never made it out of his car. He was 41. Investigators traced the payment for the hit through a family dental office near Fort Lauderdale — 44 checks signed by Donna herself, $138,000 funneled through a woman who never worked a day at the practice, and a toll transponder receipt logging every mile the killers drove. That office belonged to Donna's son, Charlie Adelson, a periodontist making three million a year from a family with more than eight million in combined accounts. Prosecutors say Charlie orchestrated his former brother-in-law's murder and funneled the payments through his own practice, with his mother washing the cash before handing it off. At trial, Charlie told the jury he was the true victim — extorted by the hitmen, forced to pay them in installments. Prosecutor Georgia Cappleman asked him one question about sending his girlfriend to collect an extortion payment. The jury took three hours to convict. Five people have now been convicted in a case that began with a family that couldn't accept losing. Hashtags #DanMarkel #CharlieAdelson #DonnaAdelson #AdelsonFamily #MurderForHire #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #WendiAdelson #FSU #Tallahassee Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Thomas Hudson alleged in custody filings that his ex-wife Shauntel took their children on the Carnival Horizon without his consent. He alleged she was responsible for their supervision and that the living arrangements were inappropriate. Shauntel testified under oath that the three teenagers chose to share a cabin — she called them “like the Three Amigos.” She also confirmed Timothy was on ADHD and insomnia medication and hadn’t taken the insomnia meds for two nights on the cruise, including the night before Anna Kepner’s body was found.That same woman just filed a child support petition against Thomas. She says he owes her back payments and that the court should order him to pay more going forward. Timothy has been locked up since mid-June, facing first-degree murder charges as an adult in his stepsister’s death. The trial date is November 2. A plea agreement must happen by October 23 or it goes to a jury.The original support order covered three kids at $2,129 a month. One aged out. Timothy went to federal detention. The number is now $1,092 for a single child. Timothy hasn’t lived under Shauntel’s roof in nearly a year. Thomas had already gone to court before the cruise, accusing Shauntel of keeping the kids from him. His lawyer asked for 140 days of make-up custody exchanges — that’s how many Shauntel had allegedly blocked.Anna’s ex-boyfriend stated publicly that the stepbrother had climbed on top of Anna during a FaceTime call. Timothy’s own step-grandmother called the cabin arrangement “a recipe for disaster.” The person demanding more child support is the same person whose decisions allegedly put those kids in that cabin.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #HiddenKillers #ShauntelHudson #CarnivalHorizon #CruiseShipMurder #ChildCustody #FederalTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

The Lindsay Clancy case has moved from one deadlocked jury to a much wider fight over what happens next. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins True Crime Today to connect Kevin Reddington's post-mistrial strategy, Patrick Clancy's response to online accusations, and Tim Cruz's decision on a second prosecution.Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026, after about 38 hours of jury deliberations over seven days. Reddington says the split was 11-1 in favor of acquittal. He then asked President Trump to consider a pardon that a president has no power to grant in a state case. He has also said Lindsay Clancy will not take a plea involving jail time.The next scheduled court date is September 29, with a Rule 25 matter among the issues set for argument.Patrick Clancy is dealing with a different legal problem around the same case. His attorney Howard Cooper says Patrick and his family have been targeted by a destructive defamation campaign built around claims that Patrick was involved in his children's deaths. Cooper said every appropriate measure would be pursued and that law enforcement had been notified.Cruz remains the person who decides whether the Commonwealth tries Lindsay Clancy again. After the mistrial, he said his office believed she was in control of her actions and described the case as cruel and calculated. He has not announced the next charging decision.Eric explains why each piece matters to that choice. The defense has a jury result it can use as leverage. Patrick's legal team is trying to stop a parallel campaign outside the courthouse. Prosecutors must decide whether the same case, a changed case, or no second trial best serves their office.September 29 is the first major point where those choices can begin to harden.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #TimCruz #KevinReddington #Mistrial #Retrial #ClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast

Judge Debra McCaslin just moved Alex Murdaugh's murder retrial to Sumter County — a location the defense never requested and the prosecution never suggested. The defense had pushed hard for Charleston, even offering to permanently waive all venue appeals if McCaslin gave them their preferred city. She didn't. The prosecution opposed Charleston on cost and logistics but never fought for a specific alternative. McCaslin made the call herself. Her eight-page order lays out why the trial had to leave Colleton County entirely. The Murdaugh family held the prosecutor's seat in the 14th Circuit for eighty-six consecutive years. That dynastic control contaminated the jury pool beyond repair. Becky Hill's conviction for jury tampering, obstruction, and perjury made the courthouse itself a liability. During the original 2023 trial, fewer than one in seven prospective jurors qualified to serve, and McCaslin says that number would be worse now. Sumter County sits in a completely different judicial circuit with roughly three times the population. The retrial is April 5, 2027, with McCaslin personally running jury selection. The defense's failed push for Charleston has a consequence: without their preferred venue, the promise to waive appeals is off the table. If this retrial ends in a conviction, venue stays a live issue all the way to the state Supreme Court.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #SumterCounty #JudgeMcCaslin #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #BeckyHill

Patrick Clancy testified against his former wife once. His attorney has now said what a second trial would mean for him, and the district attorney has to decide whether to ask. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins True Crime Today to explain how much a surviving father's wishes count.Lindsay Clancy's trial ended in a mistrial September 4, 2026, after 38 hours of deliberation. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington says the jury was 11-1 for acquittal. That same day, Patrick's attorney released a statement saying the prospect of a second trial is extraordinarily painful for him and that his focus is preserving the memory of Cora, Dawson, and Callan. DA Tim Cruz said the facts are that Lindsay Clancy killed her three children and that the evidence suggested she was in control of her actions. He called it the cruel and calculated killing of three innocents. He has not decided whether to retry her.The first-degree murder case was built on a January 24, 2023 timeline: an Apple Maps search for a Plymouth restaurant at 4:13 p.m., a takeout order at 5:10 p.m., and Patrick leaving to pick it up at 5:54 p.m. Prosecutors argued she was getting him out of the house. The defense argued postpartum psychosis and did not dispute that she caused the deaths.Eric explains how a prosecutor's office reviews a case after eleven jurors lean the other way. Whether the top charge was a trap. How failed expert testimony gets rebuilt. Where an elected DA's political math comes in. And whether a father asking to be spared can move a triple-homicide prosecution.Lindsay Clancy is charged with three counts of first-degree murder. She is held at Tewksbury Hospital. Both sides return to court September 29.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #TimCruz #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #EricFaddis #Retrial #Mistrial #PatrickClancy #PlymouthCounty

Donna Adelson allegedly offered Dan Markel a million dollars to let her daughter relocate with his children. When he refused, prosecutors say she helped arrange his murder — paid through the family dental office, 44 checks she signed to a woman who never worked there, $138,000 in documented payments, cash she allegedly washed before handing it off. The killers drove from Miami in a rental car that left a toll transponder receipt on every mile.Five people are serving time for the FSU law professor's murder. Charlie Adelson took the stand and told a jury he was being extorted by the hitmen — a $3,000 monthly layaway plan through the dental practice. The jury took three hours. Donna tried to board a one-way flight to Vietnam a week after Charlie's conviction, confessed to a jailhouse informant, wrote a handwritten script to buy false testimony, and told the sentencing judge she'd never had a parking ticket.This is the full Adelson conspiracy told start to finish — from the custody ruling the family couldn't accept, to the Dolce Vita tape, to what Wendi Adelson's ex-boyfriend says she told him five days before Dan was shot. Five convicted. Two still uncharged. The investigation is technically open. The children live in South Florida. Their last name is Adelson.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DanMarkel #AdelsonFamily #HiddenKillers #MurderForHire #DonnaAdelson #CharlieAdelson #WendiAdelson #TrueCrime #Tallahassee #FSU

Kevin Reddington asked President Trump for a pardon on national television, and a pardon is the one thing Trump cannot give him. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins True Crime Today to explain what the request is actually for.Lindsay Clancy's trial ended in a mistrial on September 4, 2026, after the jury deliberated 38 hours across seven days. Reddington says the split was 11-1 in favor of acquittal. On Good Morning America he asked the president to "consider this young lady and the person she is, what she's been through, and consider a pardon." Presidents can only pardon federal crimes. Reddington then described Plymouth County DA Tim Cruz as a hard-charging, conservative prosecutor and said he hoped Cruz would reconsider after seeing the evidence.Reddington has also ruled out any plea with jail time, saying he would not plead Lindsay Clancy to a single day because she was sick. A Rule 25 motion for a required finding of not guilty, asking the judge to end the case for lack of evidence, is set for September 29.Eric explains how a televised plea to a president becomes pressure on a county prosecutor. He weighs whether a public no-jail ultimatum is a bluff or a demand the jury split supports. He describes what a defense team says to prosecutors after a near-acquittal. He explains why a motion judges rarely grant still has a purpose. And he walks through how a deal gets built around psychiatric care instead of prison, with no admission of guilt.Lindsay Clancy is charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the January 24, 2023 deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan. She is held at Tewksbury Hospital while the DA decides whether to retry her.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #EricFaddis #TrumpPardon #Mistrial #ClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis

Patrick Clancy's attorney says the accounts accusing him in his children's deaths are about to answer for it, and one line in his statement tells you how serious this is. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins True Crime Today to explain the legal road from an online post to a courtroom.The statement from attorney Howard Cooper came out September 8, 2026. It describes months of a "relentless, escalating and destructive defamation campaign" against Patrick and his family, built on what the statement calls outright falsehoods. It says the people responsible appear intent on boosting their own social media profiles. It promises that every appropriate measure will be pursued to hold them accountable, including legally. And it says law enforcement has been notified.Eric explains how lawyers identify an anonymous poster, and why the platform usually ends up handing over the name. He explains why "in my opinion" is not the shield most creators think it is. He describes what discovery looks like for an influencer, including private messages and the money the posts earned. He explains where civil defamation ends and criminal harassment or stalking begins. And he answers whether a few high-profile lawsuits could change how creators cover the families in these cases.Patrick Clancy was the prosecution's first witness at the trial of his former wife. Lindsay Clancy was charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the January 24, 2023 deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan. The jury could not agree after 38 hours of deliberation. DA Tim Cruz has not said whether he will retry the case. Both sides are due back in court September 29.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #EricFaddis #Defamation #ClancyTrial #Duxbury #TrueCrimeCommunity

Matthew Farwell's federal murder trial begins October 5 in Boston, and the defense is preparing to put Sandra Birchmore's life on trial. Their argument: she was unstable, manipulative, a liar, and she killed herself. The prosecution's answer: every one of those traits was created by the men who exploited her since she was twelve years old.Sandra joined the Stoughton Police Explorers as a kid looking for positive male role models. Prosecutors allege Farwell began a relationship with her when she was fifteen and he was a twenty-seven-year-old officer. Three other men connected to the department were also involved. None faced criminal charges. The only arrest came three years after Sandra was found dead with a duffel bag strap tied around her neck in her Canton apartment.Farwell's DNA was the major contributor on that strap. A fracture in Sandra's hyoid bone had zero documented parallels in women found seated. She had abrasions on her nose, hemorrhage in a neck muscle, and a broken necklace on the floor. The scene was declared a suicide before the autopsy. A state trooper extracted Farwell's phone and found zero messages between him and Sandra. The FBI later recovered 32,709 of them.Sandra planned to announce her pregnancy on Valentine's Day. Farwell attended a training where the medical examiner discussed how to identify suicide in hanging deaths. The defense will show the jury Sandra's pain. The prosecution will show them who caused it.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #TrueCrimeToday #FarwellTrial #Birchmore #StoughtonPolice #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #JusticeForSandra #TrueCrimePodcast

The Lindsay Clancy trial went to a jury that deliberated for thirty-eight hours across seven days and couldn't agree. Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial September 4 after the jury reported being hopelessly deadlocked at eleven to one.Outside the courtroom, the conspiracy was already running. TikTok and Instagram creators built an alternate case against Patrick Clancy — the man who testified as the prosecution's first witness and whose ex-wife admitted through her defense that she killed their three children. Some used astrology. Others used trial footage. The theories grew through the trial and intensified after the mistrial.A man posted a TikTok saying he ended a $200,000 wedding because his fiancée expressed sympathy for Lindsay. He called her a monster. Four million people watched.On September 8, Patrick's attorney Howard Cooper called it a defamation campaign, confirmed law enforcement has been notified, and warned that consequences are coming. Lindsay's own attorney Kevin Reddington praised the conspiracy theorists' investigative ability after the mistrial.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the full picture with Tony Brueski — the relationships cracking, the father accused, and why the country can't sit with uncertainty when three children are dead.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #ConspiracyTheories #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #Nightbird #TrueCrimePodcast

Sources say medical professionals warned Rob and Michele Reiner not to let their son Nick stay in the home after a medication switch weeks before the killings. A second source confirmed doctors told the parents the change could trigger more erratic behavior. They let him stay. They’d been letting him stay for years — through the meth benders, the destroyed guest house, the threats against his sister, the stolen money, the 18 rehab stays he’d cycled through since he was 15. Nick Reiner was diagnosed with schizophrenia and spent a year under a court-ordered conservatorship for grave disability. That oversight ended in 2021 and was never renewed. Four years later, a grand jury indicted him on two counts of murder with a lying-in-wait special circumstance — an allegation that he concealed his purpose, watched and waited, and attacked his parents inside their Brentwood bedroom with the specific intent to kill. The night before, his parents had brought him to a holiday party to keep an eye on him. One guest said he was freaking everyone out. He argued loudly with his father and was asked to leave. Tony walks through the medical warnings, the behavioral record, and the lying-in-wait charge — then puts the case alongside Lindsay Clancy’s, where a mother chased her doctors for help and the system couldn’t get there in time. Nick Reiner has pleaded not guilty. Held without bail. Next hearing September 15.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #LyingInWait #LindsayClancy #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MentalHealthDefense #Schizophrenia #BrentwoodMurders #Insanity

The Lindsay Clancy trial presented two readings of the same set of facts. The prosecution said she acted deliberately and understood what she was doing. The defense said postpartum psychosis hijacked her brain and she was incapable of appreciating the wrongfulness of her actions. The jury deliberated for thirty-eight hours and couldn't agree.The public is having the same argument with less information and more certainty. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott says the fury, the side-taking, and the demand for a clean answer all trace back to a biological truth most people are unwilling to confront: severe postpartum psychosis is a real medical event that can happen to a person with no history of violence.Scott explains what the word "monster" does psychologically when applied to a case like this — and who it's actually protecting. Why the public distinguishes between a heart attack causing a fatal car crash and a brain illness causing a catastrophe. What it means when mothers watching the trial recognize something in Lindsay's story they've carried in silence.And the clinical bottom line: when the loudest public message is that compassion for a mentally ill mother makes you dangerous, the next mother in crisis gets the message too.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #ShavaunScott #Nightbird #MentalHealth #Motherhood #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast

Three weeks before the murder, Wendi Adelson called Dan Markel an "STD" and an "emotional terrorist." Five days before, her boyfriend Jeffrey Lacasse says she told him her brother Charlie had looked into every option for dealing with the "Danny problem" — including hiring a hitman for fifteen thousand dollars. Lacasse called the statement "chilling." Wendi denied saying it under oath at four separate trials.The day before the killing, she asked Lacasse about his Friday travel route past Dan's house, then emailed him not to contact her for a week. The morning of July 18, 2014, she was home waiting for a Geek Squad technician to fix a TV that prosecutors say was code for the murder plan. An hour later, she drove past police tape at Dan's house, knowing her children were there, and didn't call anyone.Two weeks after the murder, Lacasse testified that Wendi told him she and Charlie went to what Charlie described as a "celebration dinner." Wendi denied that too. Five people are in prison. Wendi Adelson has never been charged. This is the fourth installment of the Adelson series — the story of the ex-wife, the boyfriend, and the questions that remain.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#WendiAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #MurderForHire #AdelsonFamily #TrueCrime #JeffreyLacasse #Unindicted #Tallahassee #FSU

Patrick Clancy buried three children. He testified in the trial that followed their deaths. He divorced Lindsay, remarried, and tried to build a new life in New York. Lindsay admitted through her defense that she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. The jury deadlocked eleven to one and Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4.The conspiracy theories started during the trial. TikTok and Instagram creators accused Patrick of being the real killer. Some used astrology and birth charts. Others analyzed trial livestream footage frame by frame. Creators compared him to Chris Watts. Tabloids ran paparazzi photos of Patrick and his new wife under headlines designed to make grief look suspicious.On September 8, Patrick's attorney Howard Cooper released a statement through publicist Diana Pisciotta calling the accusations a defamation campaign and confirming law enforcement has been notified. Cooper said the conspiracy has produced threats to Patrick's reputation, livelihood, and life.Lindsay's own defense attorney Kevin Reddington, asked about the theories after the mistrial, praised the internet investigators' ability to "ferret out facts."Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines how a father became a suspect in the court of TikTok, what makes a conspiracy feel more real than a courtroom admission, and what Patrick's forced response reveals about where true crime fandom has landed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #ConspiracyTheories #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #ShavaunScott #Nightbird #Defamation #TrueCrimePodcast

The Lindsay Clancy jury was deadlocked eleven to one after six weeks. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4 after thirty-eight hours of deliberation. Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz hasn't said whether he'll retry the case.Outside the courtroom, the case was already being retried in kitchens and comment sections across the country. A man posted a TikTok claiming he canceled his $200,000 wedding because his fiancée told him he couldn't understand postpartum illness. He called her a monster. Four million people watched and turned the breakup into a referendum on the entire case.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott explains how a criminal trial about postpartum psychosis became a relationship test. Why the word "monster" keeps moving from the defendant to anyone who disagrees with your read. What it means when the jury that heard all the evidence couldn't agree but people who never set foot in the courtroom are absolutely certain. And why the next woman experiencing frightening postpartum thoughts may be watching all of this and deciding silence is safer than honesty.The verdict wasn't a verdict. The public's was.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #Nightbird #MentalHealth #Motherhood #TrueCrimePodcast

Duane "Keffe D" Davis was convicted of first-degree murder on August 31, 2026 for orchestrating the shooting of Tupac Shakur in Las Vegas in 1996. The confession that built that case didn't come from the Tupac investigation. It came from the Biggie Smalls investigation.In 2008, LAPD detectives approached Davis about the murder of Christopher Wallace. He denied any role in Biggie's death. Then he told them he was involved in Tupac's. Detectives who went looking for one killer found another — and the institution behind them responded by disbanding the task force, letting the lead detective walk away, and going silent on Biggie's case for the next sixteen years.The alleged shooter in Biggie's murder was killed in 2003. The original lead detective died in 2015 after being forced off the case by his own chief. The woman who confessed to arranging the hit has immunity. The man both investigations point to as the person who ordered it is serving a 28-year sentence and has never admitted a thing. The LAPD won't confirm whether anyone is still investigating. This episode lays out the full chain of institutional failures that left a solvable murder unsolved for twenty-nine years.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NotoriousBIG #BiggieSmalls #TrueCrimeToday #KeffeD #TupacShakur #LAPD #ColdCase #SugeKnight #Unsolved #TrueCrime

The jury split eleven to one. The trial ended in a mistrial. And instead of closure, the Lindsay Clancy case broke into three simultaneous legal fights.The first: DA Timothy Cruz deciding whether to retry a case where eleven jurors reportedly sided with the defense. Judge Sullivan scheduled a September 29 status conference and indicated he wants to retry in the fall.The second: Two civil lawsuits — one from Patrick Clancy, one from Lindsay — against the same medical providers. The complaints allege nine psychiatric medications, eight in a three-week window, telehealth-only care from a psychiatrist who never met her patient, and no coordinated treatment plan. With the criminal case stalled, the civil track is the only active proceeding examining the medical timeline.The third: The legal maneuvering for a potential second trial. Reddington wants the next jury sequestered. A 56-year-old woman was arrested for filming jurors during deliberations. The prosecution characterized Clancy’s injuries as insincere and may have lost eleven jurors doing it.Clancy had pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The defense argued postpartum psychosis and overmedication. Prosecutors alleged deliberate action.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines all three battles in one extended conversation — what the deadlock signals, what the lawsuits allege, and whether the prosecution can survive a second trial after an eleven-to-one rejection.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #Mistrial #MedicalMalpractice #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Lindsay Clancy’s first jury left without a verdict. Her lawyer was ready to return to court within days.Kevin Reddington asked for an expedited chance to argue that the prosecution hadn’t proved enough to convict. He also proposed moving quickly into another trial if the judge refused. Neither request guaranteed that timetable.Tony Brueski follows the decisions that could bring a new jury into this case, along with the consequences for Patrick Clancy and a family still living with the loss.Would another trial get prosecutors a different result—and what would it cost the people asked to relive it?Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Substack: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX: https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TonyBrueski #KevinReddington #PatrickClancy #HungJury #Mistrial #Massachusetts #ClancyUpdate #TrueCrimeCommunity

The prosecution in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial made a strategic choice: argue that her fall from a second-story window was not a genuine attempt on her life and that her injuries were superficial. Clancy sat in a wheelchair, paralyzed from the waist down, while the jury heard it.Eleven of twelve jurors reportedly sided with the defense. The trial ended in a mistrial after seven days of deliberation at Plymouth Superior Court. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington blamed the prosecution’s tactics and said the jury had been “robbed” by the lone holdout.Reddington’s legal maneuvers in the trial’s final hours were aggressive. He asked Judge Sullivan to dismiss the holdout juror. Sullivan refused. He asked for a lesser-charge poll. Sullivan refused. He filed an emergency petition with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The court denied it.Separately, a 56-year-old woman named Dawn Light was arrested during deliberations for allegedly filming jurors in a courthouse parking lot. She was charged with aggravated intimidation. Reddington has said he will demand the next jury be sequestered.DA Timothy Cruz defended his prosecution and said he would decide on a retrial shortly. The case relied on the McHoul standard, which asks jurors to assess whether a defendant had substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines whether the prosecution’s framing of Clancy’s injuries alienated the jury, what the emergency petition reveals about the defense’s confidence, and whether the insanity standard itself is the problem.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #DATimothyCruz #Retrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Donna Adelson signed 44 checks to a woman who never worked at her dental practice. She allegedly scheduled her daughter's Geek Squad alibi for the morning of the murder. She called her son Charlie three times instead of calling the police when the FBI bumped her with the killers' names. And when her son was convicted of murder, she showed up at Miami International Airport with a one-way ticket to Vietnam.In jail, two informants testified Donna confessed. One said Donna told her: "She did it. It was to keep her grandkids. But it wasn't supposed to go that far." The other said Donna wrote a question-and-answer script in her own handwriting — a rehearsed story for another inmate to perform under oath — and offered ten thousand dollars and a grand piano as payment. A state handwriting expert confirmed the writing was Donna's.The jury deliberated for three hours. At sentencing, the woman who prosecutors say orchestrated a murder through her family's dental office stood in shackles and a purple jumpsuit and told the judge she'd never had a parking ticket. Judge Everett cited her utter lack of remorse. This is the third installment of the four-part Adelson series.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #MurderForHire #AdelsonFamily #TrueCrime #Vietnam #ParkingTicket #Tallahassee #Convicted

Nine psychiatric medications. Eight prescribed in a three-week span. Telehealth-only appointments with a psychiatrist who never met her patient in person. No coordinated care plan. And a healthcare system that, according to two separate civil lawsuits, failed to diagnose a mother spiraling into postpartum psychosis.Patrick Clancy filed a wrongful death suit in January 2026. Lindsay Clancy filed a medical malpractice complaint two days later. Both name the same providers — Dr. Jennifer Tufts, nurse practitioners Rebecca Jollotta and Julie Paul, therapist Lateisha Dukes, Aster Mental Health, and South Shore Health.The criminal trial at Plymouth Superior Court produced five weeks of testimony and ended in a mistrial after the jury deadlocked eleven to one. Clancy had pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. Prosecutors alleged deliberate action. The defense argued postpartum psychosis and overmedication.The prosecution’s psychiatric experts and the defense’s psychiatric experts gave the jury contradictory assessments of Clancy’s mental state. The jury could not resolve the disagreement.With the criminal case suspended, the civil lawsuits are now the only proceedings actively examining the treatment decisions that preceded the killings. Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines what the providers face, whether the mistrial changes their exposure, and why the medical accountability fight may outlast the criminal one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #MedicalMalpractice #PostpartumPsychosis #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Eleven jurors in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial reportedly wanted to acquit. One refused. After seven days and more than thirty-six hours of deliberation, Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial at Plymouth Superior Court.The jury of nine women and three men faced one question: was Clancy criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — at the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023. Clancy admitted to killing them. Her defense argued postpartum psychosis and overmedication stripped her ability to understand what she was doing. Prosecutors said she was rational and deliberate.Defense attorney Kevin Reddington characterized the split as eleven to one for acquittal and went public immediately. He called the holdout biased, thanked the jurors “minus one,” and said the jury was “robbed.” He then filed an emergency petition with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to intervene. The court denied it within the hour.When the formal mistrial was read, female jurors broke down in the courtroom. One put her face in her hands. Another clenched her fists. A third would not open her eyes.DA Timothy Cruz defended his prosecution and said he would decide shortly on a retrial. Sullivan scheduled a status conference for September 29 and said he wanted to retry the case in the fall.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines whether one holdout truly changes the trajectory of this case and what leverage the eleven-to-one split gives Reddington in retrial negotiations. He also asks why the families on both sides may be the ones who decide whether this happens again.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #Mistrial #HungJury #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Barry Morphew’s Denver traffic encounter is now part of the legal fight over the conditions keeping him out of jail while he awaits trial in Suzanne Morphew’s death.Court records say another driver accused Morphew of aggressive driving before two vehicles were struck. Judge Amanda Hopkins later reviewed video and wrote that the person visible in it is clearly Morphew.According to Hopkins, he refused to give his name or identification and indicated he didn’t have insurance. He then allegedly offered the other driver a specific amount of money for the damage.She refused and said police were being called. The judge says Morphew left, nearly struck another person, and drove over a curb.Hopkins restricted him to his home. Prosecutors want no driving and tighter monitoring, arguing that the encounter gives the court new reasons to examine flight risk.The cash offer is the detail that makes this episode impossible to ignore.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrimeToday #BarryMorphewTrial #SuzanneMorphewCase #ColoradoTrueCrime #MorphewCase #TrueCrimePodcast #ColoradoCourts #CrimeNews

Lindsay Clancy is the defendant, but the public has spent this trial judging nearly everyone around her.The jury is being dissected after days of deadlock and an allegation that one member is not properly applying reasonable doubt. Patrick Clancy has been attacked online for forgiving Lindsay and rebuilding his life despite no evidence implicating him. Prosecutors are facing questions about why the case went to trial after Kevin Reddington said no plea offer was ever made.Tony Brueski connects those controversies to the central issue jurors must decide: whether Lindsay was criminally responsible.Psychiatrists disagreed. The jury disagreed. The public certainly disagrees.Maybe that is the real story.A legal system designed to produce binary answers has collided with a tragedy in which almost every important human question exists somewhere in the gray.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyCase #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #JuryDeadlock #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalResponsibility #JusticeSystem #CourtroomAnalysis #TonyBrueski

Tyler Robinson pleaded not guilty in the Charlie Kirk case after a Utah judge found probable cause for aggravated murder and six other charges. Prosecutors say a private message exchange, surveillance footage, DNA testing and a rifle recovered near the alleged escape route support their case. Robinson remains presumed innocent.The defense is testing the state’s evidence without committing publicly to one final theory. Its lawyers have challenged identification and forensic interpretation and argue that one shot directed at Kirk does not establish the danger to others required for the capital aggravator.Utah law allows Robinson to maintain a not-guilty plea, force prosecutors to prove every element and later change that plea before conviction. No agreement has been announced. One alleged message remains the detail that makes the plea difficult to square with the prosecution’s account.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CharlieKirkCase #TylerRobinson #TrueCrimeToday #CharlieKirk #NotGuiltyPlea #AggravatedMurder #DeathPenaltyCase #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #LegalAnalysis

Kevin Reddington says Plymouth County prosecutors never offered Lindsay Clancy a plea deal.With first-degree murder charges remaining in place, Massachusetts law required a jury trial. Now that jury has struggled for days with the exact question everyone knew would define the case: criminal responsibility.The defense says Clancy experienced postpartum psychosis and lacked the substantial capacity required by law. Prosecutors argue that despite her mental illness, she understood the wrongfulness of her conduct and could control it.Tony Brueski asks whether a system offering such radically different destinations—life without parole or psychiatric confinement—is actually measuring culpability with the precision this case requires.And if the central goal is protecting society, what specifically does incarceration accomplish that secure psychiatric treatment would not?That is not an argument for either verdict. It is a question about what punishment is supposed to do.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyCase #LindsayClancyTrial #PleaDeal #CriminalResponsibility #PostpartumPsychosis #JusticeSystem #MassachusettsLaw #CourtroomAnalysis #TonyBrueski