PODCAST · society
Basis Of Morality
by Arthur Schopenhauer
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Heg
-
13
013 - Part IV Chapters 1-2 and Judgement of the Royal Danish Society of Sciences
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
12
012 - Part III Chapter 9
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
11
011 - Part III Chapter 8
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
10
010 - Part III Chapter 7
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
9
009 - Part III Chapter 6
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
8
008 - Part III Chapters 3-5
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
7
007 - Part II Chapter 9 Part III Chapters 1-2
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
6
006 - Part II Chapters 7-8 and Note on Ch 8
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
5
005 - Part II Note on Ch 4 and Chapters 5-6
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
4
004 - Part II Chapters 3-4
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
3
003 - Part II Chapters 1-2
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
2
002 - The Question and Part I Chapters 1-2
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
-
1
001 - Translator's Preface and Introduction
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Hegelian moral perspective. (Summary by Jeffrey Allen Stumpf)
We're indexing this podcast's transcripts for the first time — this can take a minute or two. We'll show results as soon as they're ready.
No matches for "" in this podcast's transcripts.
No topics indexed yet for this podcast.
Loading reviews...
ABOUT THIS SHOW
In 1837, the Danish Royal Society of Sciences ignited a quest for deeper understanding by offering a prize for the best essay on the nature of morality. Is the essence of our moral compass derived from our consciousness and the ethical concepts it generates, or does it arise from another source? German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer responded with his profound work, The Basis of Morality, published in 1840. In this engaging essay, he challenges the prevailing moral theories of his time, particularly those of Immanuel Kant, and presents his own compelling principles and thought experiments. Schopenhauers key assertion is that compassion is the cornerstone of all morality. In an intriguing appendix, he connects his philosophical insights to the wisdom of the Vedas and Upanishads, revealing a rich tapestry of thought. Despite being the only submission, his essay was controversially rejected, allegedly due to his scathing critique of Hegel, the very judge of the contest who promoted a Heg
HOSTED BY
Arthur Schopenhauer
CATEGORIES
Loading similar podcasts...