PODCAST
Equal Justice Under the Law?
by Office of the Alumni Association
Presented in Fall 2003, the Alumni Studies Course, “Equal Justice Under Law? The Supreme Court, the Constitution, and American Politics” introduced participants to the theoretical and practical issues raised by the Court’s power of judicial review. The course began by examining the fundamental issues about who should enforce the Constitution and how to interpret it. It then investigated specific controversies from the Court’s docket. Issues covered included abortion, gay rights, affirmative action, anti-terrorism legislation, and the Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore.
-
5
Judicial Globalization
Anne-Marie Slaughter ’80, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School, discusses judicial globalization, international judicial relations, and the impact on federal constitutional jurisprudence. Presented as part of the "Equal Justice Under Law?" Alumni Studies course, Fall 2003.
-
4
Devolution by Decree: The Supreme Court, States’ Rights and the New Federalism
Martin Flaherty ’81, Visiting Professor of Public and International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School, examines the issues of states' rights and federalism and the changing role of the Supreme Court in its relationship with the doctrine of federalism. Presented as part of the "Equal Justice Under Law?" Alumni Studies course, Fall 2003.
-
3
Why it Matters that the Constitution is so Hard to Change: The United States and International Human Rights
Stanley Katz h21, Lecturer with the rank of Professor in Public and International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School, discusses U.S. involvement in the international human rights arena through the lens of American legal and constitutional history. Presented as part of the "Equal Justice Under Law?" Alumni Studies course, Fall 2003.
-
2
Negotiating Racial Equality After the New Deal: A Developmental Perspective on Blacks and Labor
Kenneth I. Kersch, Assistant Professor of Politics, explores the history of Supreme Court decisions that pertain to equality, specifically in the areas of labor rights and civil rights during the 20th century, and how this impacts modern constitutionalism. Presented as part of the "Equal Justice Under Law?" Alumni Studies course, Fall 2003.
-
1
How to Criticize the Supreme Court
Provost Christopher Eisgruber’83, Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Public Affairs in the Woodrow Wilson School and the University Center for Human Values, revisits the politically controversial case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) and its significance in forcing the important question of how to criticize the Supreme Court responsibly, in ways that are not reduced to mere statements of partisan political preference. Presented as part of the "Equal Justice Under Law?" Alumni Studies course, Fall 2003.
No matches for "" in this podcast's transcripts.
No topics indexed yet for this podcast.
Loading reviews...
ABOUT THIS SHOW
Presented in Fall 2003, the Alumni Studies Course, “Equal Justice Under Law? The Supreme Court, the Constitution, and American Politics” introduced participants to the theoretical and practical issues raised by the Court’s power of judicial review. The course began by examining the fundamental issues about who should enforce the Constitution and how to interpret it. It then investigated specific controversies from the Court’s docket. Issues covered included abortion, gay rights, affirmative action, anti-terrorism legislation, and the Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore.
HOSTED BY
Office of the Alumni Association
Loading similar podcasts...