216 - Waterworld

What this episode covers

A listener named Jackson recommended this movie to us, and we dove right in! Contemporary reviews for the film were mixed. Roger Ebert gave Waterworld 2.5 stars out of 4 and said: ”The cost controversy aside, Waterworld is a decent futuristic action picture with some great sets, some intriguing ideas, and a few images that will stay with me. It could have been more, it could have been better, and it could have made me care about the characters. It’s one of those marginal pictures you’re not unhappy to have seen, but can’t quite recommend.” Owen Gleiberman gave it a B in Entertainment Weekly. He commented that while its massive budget had paid off by genuinely creating the sensation of a world built on water, the film generally came off as a second-rate rip-off of The Road Warrior, with weaker, slower-paced action sequences and less startling villains. He praised Costner’s performance, but found the film’s environmental message pretentious. James Berardinelli of Reelviews Movie Reviews was one of the film’s few supporters, calling it ”one of Hollywood’s most lavish features to date”. He wrote: ”Although the storyline isn’t all that invigorating, the action is, and that’s what saves Waterworld. In the tradition of the old Westerns and Mel Gibson’s Mad Max flicks, this film provides good escapist fun. Everyone behind the scenes did their part with aplomb, and the result is a feast for the eyes and ears.” Mick LaSalle, reviewing the film the week of its release on home video, argued that it did not deserve some of its more negative reviews, since ”despite its confused impulses and occasional slow spots, Waterworld... has an elusive, appealing spirit that holds up for more than two hours. It’s a genuine vault at greatness that misses the mark -- but survives.” He commented that while the film succeeds at its high ambitions for isolated moments, the clash between its earnest ambition and intrusive flashiness makes it generally fall short of its reach. On Rotten Tomatoes the film holds an approval rating of 47% based on 60 reviews, with an average rating of 5.5/10. The site’s critics consensus reads: ”Though it suffered from toxic buzz at the time of its release, Waterworld is ultimately an ambitious misfire: an extravagant sci-fi flick with some decent moments and a lot of silly ones.” Metacritic assigned the film a weighted average score of 56 out of 100, based on 17 critics, indicating ”mixed or average reviews”. Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of ”B” on an A+ to F scale. In a 2020 retrospective, Ben Child of The Guardian described it as ”a perfectly watchable sci-fi cult classic” that deserves reappraisal. He acknowledged that much of the plot was illogical and absurd and some of the action set-pieces ”preposterously ambitious”, but argued that both of them offer excitement and B-movie charm.