*23.2 Makkos Daf 15 A (4 lines Dn)*

*23.2 Makkos Daf 15 A (4 lines Dn)**Sponsor a day's learning* (thousands of minutes!) for only $50 *click here:*https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTU=Rabbah bar bar Chanah quoted Rabbi Yochanan as enunciating a rule that a lav shekadmo eseh is not considered a _lav hanitak l’eseh_ and carries a malkos penalty.Rabbi Yochanan retracted.Rabbah proved this law from our mishna.*Summary**Question: What caused Rabbi Yochanan to retract his opinion?**Answer:* It was contradicted by *the law of Oneis.*_[The possuk states regarding an oneis “He must take her for his wife” (eseh) “He can never divorce her” (lav)]_*Beraisa:* If an _oneis_ was married and divorced. *If he can remarry her, he must* do so. If he’s a _kohen_ and cannot remarry her, he receives _malkos._Why does her husband not receive _malkos_ [in most cases]? While it seems to be a _lav hanitak l’eseh_ it is in fact a _lav shekadmo eseh_ .We see from here that *a _lav shekadmo eseh_ is just like any other _lav hanitak l’eseh._**Ulla:* The _eseh_ here is superfluous because *it can be learned from _motzi shem ra._* Since the sin of _oneis_ is more grievous than that of _motzi shem ra_ , we understand that the _eseh_ surely applies.Thus we use the principle of *_im ein inyan_ to move the _eseh_ after the _lav_* and render it a _lav hanitak l’eseh._ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate