Skip to content
275: What Good Death Quotes episode artwork

Jan 25, 2021 41 min

275: What Good Death Quotes

from Dear Hank & John

How does public domain work? What is the most common name in human history? Why do we sleep in the dark? What's up with epigraphs in books? When does researching become spying? How are categories useful? Hank Green and John Green have answers! If you're in need of dubious advice, email us at [email protected]. Join us for monthly livestreams and an exclusive weekly podcast at patreon.com/dearhankandjohn. Follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/dearhankandjohn If you're in need of dubious advice, email us at [email protected]. Join us for monthly livestreams at patreon.com/dearhankandjohn. Follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/dearhankandjohn

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

275: What Good Death Quotes

0:00 41:12
of matches

Transcript Auto-generated, may contain errors

Hey, so something worth knowing is a benefit for the nonprofit organization that makes Crash Course and SciShow Complexly. It's September 16th, 2026 in Los Angeles, California at the Wilshire Ebell Theater. Please join us. It's going to be incredible.

Friends of Complexly like Mark Rober, Katie Max, Simone Yech, and Moore will share inspiring talks about what makes them hopeful and join Hank Green on stage for fun, interactive discussions. Complexly has been creating free educational content like SciShow and PBS eons and Crash Course and Bizarre Beasts for nearly 15 years and 6 billion views. But this year, we have become a 501c3 nonprofit and we're doing something worth knowing as an in-person event that benefits Complexly and our impactful educational media. It's the first ever Complexly in-person event and it's a fundraiser to support our mission of inspiring curiosity and lowering barriers to knowledge building because curiosity builds understanding and understanding builds a better world.

Tickets tickets go on sale to the general public June 30th at somethingworthknowing.com So come build a better world with us on September 16th and experience something worth knowing you can get your ticket at Complexly.info slash something. Welcome to Dear Hank and John! Goers out for a think of the Dear John and Hank. It's a podcast where two brothers answer your questions, give you a surprise, and bring them all the weeks from both Mars and AFC Wimbledon.

John, we have pretty good childhood. Remember when Dad used to take us to that hill and put us in tires and roll us down? Only vaguely. Yeah, those were good years.

Those were good years. Did he do that? I don't actually remember that. Okay.

No. I mean, I do kind of vaguely remember being inside a tire at some point in my life, but I don't think I was rolled down a hill in one. I had so much childhood and I have so few memories of it that I just assume whatever anyone tells me is true. You know, like, remember when Dad used to put us in tires and roll us?

I mean, I couldn't actually know that I'd said it out loud. I don't know whether or not that happened. I was a child for thousands and thousands of days and I have like seven memories. So who knows?

John, I did this gag a while back. We made a video on our Bizarre Beasts YouTube channel. YouTube becomes such bizarre beasts where we talk about Binterongs and Binterongs P smells a little bit like buttered popcorn, which is real weird. And a person who works in a wildlife place where they have wild animals, including a Binterong, sent me a jar of Binterong P and it was and like, this is great.

It means I can as a part of this thing smell the Binterong P and tell you what it actually smells like to me, not just like that you've heard this, but this is like a direct report with a man holding a jar with a towel that is soaked in the scent of a Binterong. And it's a good gag. It's a good thing where I'm a content creator and I will do what it takes to create a content. But I do not know what to do with this jar of Binterong smell.

Well, it's been sitting on my desk now for like a month and a half. I've got a solution. It's not like you have an actual organism that you're going to like mess up the Montana wilderness or whatever by introducing this new kind of tree frog. It's a liquid.

Like you just pour it out and then you wash extensively, wash out the container. It's not like just a jar of P. It's like a jar of the towel that the Binterong peed on. But it is like there's like a dewy inside just because it was warmer wherever it was than where it is now.

Okay, I have a new idea then, which is that you need to dig a hole and you need to bury it. You need to have a kind of a series of farewell rituals that the whole family participates in. And then you bury it. We have recently buried it.

Do you want to smell it? No, I can send it to you. Oh, no, thank you. I appreciate the gesture, but I'm good.

I I'm all full up on other organisms P right now. Just jars of things, just jars of things. I am kind of, you know, I like a little bit having a bunch of weird stuff. I've got two decapitated bobble johns.

Yeah, it's just over the years. All of my bobble heads are that weird, actually. The bobble head versions of me, I would say 95% of them have been accidentally or purposefully decapitated. Yeah, they do have a seeming just a weakness at the neck, I suppose.

Yeah, the whole underlying problem with bobble heads, right, is that they're a little top heavy. Yeah, well, we wanted to make it accurate. And you and I both also have weaknesses at the neck. It's true.

And the rest of our bodies too. This first question comes from Scott. We're going to answer some questions from our listeners because that's what we do on the podcast. Scott writes, Dear John and Hank, what's the deal with works entering the public domain?

What does that phrase even mean? Does it just mean that like everyone owns it now? Like I recently purchased a new copy of Dracula. That $12 had to go to someone, right?

I get that I'm paying for like printing and binding and whatnot. But could I just legally print my own copies of Dracula and sell them? Yes. Yes.

You could. Yes. In fact, we've thought about doing that. Yeah, we've thought about doing a series of public domain, like beautiful books that are expensive and that people buy and then we give all the money to charity.

Yeah. But then that seemed like a lot of work and actually publishing. It's also hard. Yeah, publishing is really difficult.

The margins. Yeah. The profit margins aren't that great because of the aforementioned binding and whatnot. Yeah, there's a lot that goes into it.

I mean, especially to make something that's attractive. But even to make something that's readable, like book design is hard. I don't understand why it's so hard. But I tried to do it once and I was like, Oh my God, this is a high skill job.

It's one of those things that's like, you would imagine putting words on a piece of paper in a way that is attractive would be something that you would be able to do. No, but it is not. No, you have to have a lot of skill to do it well. Yeah.

And a lot of training as well, I think. So yeah, that's one reason. The other thing to remember in this Scott is that like as a rule, the author doesn't get that much of the cost of a book. Right.

Like the money that goes to the author is not that large a percentage of the book cost. And so removing that, which is what happens when a book enters the public domain, doesn't shave that much off the cost of a book. Now there are like Dover thrift editions and stuff that costs like two or $3 and that, you know, are made to be as inexpensive as possible, smallest possible margins, the least space between lines, etc. Yeah.

But in general, this stuff costs money. Interestingly, even ebooks kind of cost money. Like it's still a fair amount of work. Yeah, it's it's work to prepare them to be an ebook.

Once they are an ebook, it is basically free to make like another copy, which is the nice thing about ebooks. But this is why you could download like you could, for example, download Dracula for free, no problem. But getting a physical copy, especially if it's kind of look nice, costs money in the same way that like my book costs money, but you know, minus the 50 cents or whatever I make on a paperback. I have often been asked how I feel about the prospect of my work someday entering the public domain.

And the answer is that I feel delighted. If my yeah, if there's a single person who wants to read my books the day after they enter the public domain, dead me is going to be so happy. I mean, it really should happen sooner. And there's interesting effects, right?

Like, like the first Agatha Christie books are now entering the public domain. But Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has been for a long, long time. And that's why there's so many Sherlock things. Yeah.

And much fewer, Plaro and Miss Marple things. Like you can, like, you can make a Sherlock thing you right now, you can go and make a Sherlock thing, you can sell it, you can write Sherlock fan fiction and put it in a book and sell it to a person in a way that you can't with, you know, anything that's not in the public domain, which is why there's like Sherlock, a TV show and there's like the British Sherlock show and the American Sherlock show and there's like Sherlock with Robert Downey Jr. and they're all different Sherlock's. But you can do that because it's in the public domain.

It isn't just like, I can print a copy of Sherlock Holmes book, which I could do or record an audio book of it. Like I could do all those things. Right. But I can also use that character.

Yeah. And that allows for all this freedom and all this creation that otherwise wouldn't happen. And it allows Sherlock Holmes to continue living new lives, which I think is just so exciting. Yeah.

And really, I think what most creators would like the most is not for their descendants to make the most possible money from their intellectual property, but to have the work survive, to have, you know, the work and the characters be in conversation with the present in some way. Yeah. Like what you really want is for people to continue to care about your work, because that kind of keeps the stories alive and contemporary, even as they age. And so I, yeah, I agree.

Like, I would be happy if my work went into the public domain in, you know, less than 90 years or whatever the current number is. Yeah, I don't think that either of us have created characters that will live the way that Sherlock did, but I think that there are lots of characters out there like that are not, that are not able to live that life. Right. Yeah, for sure.

And lots of stories that, you know, for example, the people who are really big about preventing works from going into the public domain like Disney, like they had lots of stories that they profited off of that were not, that were released in the public domain, like Peter Pan, like Cinderella, Snow White, I mean, the list is literally endless. It was all of their original things, or just things that had already been created. They were in the public domain. They made them.

And now they're like, actually, I'm not so sure that you can make that now because we kind of have, we've kind of the people who made Peter Pan, Peter Pan, Peter Pan things. Yeah, but they get annoyed when you try to make a Snow White thing that's too much like there's Snow White thing. Right. So that's the deal with the public domain.

And I believe very strongly that things should end up in the public domain sooner. That said, Hank, you and I could both release our work into the public domain if we wanted to, and we choose not to. So yeah, well, I've only had like five years. It's not Be It Ourselves and Glory here.

I'm not ready to now part ways with looking for Alaska just yet. I may get there, but not today. This next question, John comes from Sarah Beth who asks Dear Hank and John, I was thinking the other day about how many people have been named Jose, and I was wondering, what is the most common name ever in the world, not just people living right now, but if you look at names throughout all of history, what name has been used the most, I will never be the most common Sarah Beth. Hey, you don't know that there's a long future for humanity ahead.

I am hoping and maybe Sarah Beth is really going to catch on and there'll be billions of you someday. John, I found this question fascinating when I did a little research because I was like, I don't know, maybe somebody knows the answer to this. Not only does no one know the answer to this, no one could know the answer to this. And two different people could come up with very different different answers, because do you count Joe's as Jose's?

Do you count Sarah's with an H or without an H? Do you do you only use English or do you look at all of the languages? Do you consider the same name the same name if it isn't, you know, basically the same one language from another or it's pretty different, like John Giovanni. Exactly.

Like very different names, but they are the same name. So it's impossible to know because there are lots of subjective decisions that you would have to make, which also it's kind of beautiful to me that there are like it turns out that this thing that we would think is pretty objective turns out to would really require a lot of subjective decision-making on the part of the person doing the study. And that is often the case when we are studying things like this, sociological things where people and like in the way that people have done these analyses, they often say they often only count like individual spellings. And so like, for example, Oliver would get a preference because there's really only one way to spell Oliver, but Muhammad would not get a preference and might rank higher than Oliver, but it's actually weighed on the list because there's like three or four different common ways to spell it.

Yeah. Yeah. There are different ways to transliterate different names, but then also as names spread among languages, those names can be spelled or pronounced differently. I think though that we also can't know because we don't know the names of almost everyone who ever lived.

That's the other thing. There's this common misconception that there are like a huge percentage of the people who ever lived are currently alive because population growth has been quite, quite dramatic, you know, and that's true. I mean, the global population has been doubling faster and faster over time. And but 93 to 95, maybe 97 billion people have lived, of whom like 7 billion are currently alive, and only like 40 or 50 billion lived in the last 100 years.

Right. But and also, if you go back a couple or a few hundred years, we just don't know what those people's names were. Like, not very many places have good records. You could do it in like Ireland and that's it.

Not only that, 99.9% of human history occurred more than 2,500 years ago. Yeah. Almost the whole time we've been here, we know quite little about at least in terms of like what everybody's name was. Oh, God, I would love to know what somebody's name was 50,000 years ago.

Wouldn't that be cool to know? Yeah. I mean, we're not even totally sure that people had names 50,000 years ago. I mean, I, I, they must have, they must have had something like names.

And I, and like, we're always like cavemen, grug and hug. And I'm like, no, they would have had beautiful names or not. I mean, there's a lot of like beautiful languages out there, Hank, but like maybe it all sounded like Dutch and it just sounded like they were all clear in their throats. Wow.

Gosh. Oh, that's, that's honestly, all the Dutch people listening are just nodding in in acknowledgement. They know it's not a bad thing. It's a great language.

It's extremely expressive. It's just like a lot of all right. Keep going, John. And you know, more about the Dutch than I do.

You live there for a while. I, I, I'm sorry if I hurt any Dutch people's feelings by saying that the language involves a lot of what it does. I mean, look, American English to be clear is hideous. I'm aware like I, I hear when British people do American accents, I'm always like, oh, geez.

That's what we sound like. We do make a lot of, eh, no, it's also flat and nasally. We got, we get our ideas across. I'd like a hamburger.

I believe in capitalism. I believe that banks should never be regulated. Okay. I don't have enough cars.

Do you have any mayonnaise for this sandwich? All right. All right. That's a little too close to home.

The American accent. That's what we sound like to the rest of the world. This next question comes from Grace here. I didn't know the answer to this.

I don't know if you know the answer. I thought it was an interesting question. Why do we sleep in the dark? Like if it's night outside and our bodies know it's night and we're tired and all that, why do we still sleep better with the lights out?

Amazingly, Grace. Oh, Grace, this is, you're going to have to, we're all going to have to get used to this thing that is hard to believe that we are not in control of our bodies and that there are lots of things happening way beyond our notice and completely out of our control. And one of those things is that dark makes us sleepy and light makes us less sleepy, even in situations where we'd like to be sleeping. And we take that information in through our eyes and we get that both through our eyelids a little bit, but also when we sort of like rouse throughout the night and take a little bit of light by opening our eyes a little bit in ways that we would never notice unless there is a bunch of light that would wake us up.

So our circadian rhythms, which defines when we get sleepy and how well we sleep and how stressed out we are during sleep times are controlled by the amount of light that we perceive. And only through our eyes, it seems like there's with some thought that maybe our skin, because there are compounds in our skin that respond, like kind of correspond to light, but it appears that people who, like blind people who have can sense no light, basically their circadian rhythms are not affected by the presence or absence of light. So it's just what we are seeing. And we are not in control of it, and we are not aware of it, but it is a thing.

And why, evolutionarily, as a separate question, but physiologically, it is a rigid system. Let me ask you a follow up question. Is there any way that a nocturnal animal in your opinion could ever become like the sentient dominant species on the planet? Or is being nocturnal just kind of an inherent problem?

Well, I think absolutely, they could. But also their nocturnal isn't actually that common of a trait like where they're a sleep all day and awake all night. Mostly what we have is direnality, where what we think of as nocturnal species are active a little bit for a while after night, and then they go back to bed. But yeah, I don't see why, not especially like they've got other ways of sensing the world around them.

The question that keeps me at that night is whether that could happen to an organism that exists under the water. A superior fish being, if you will. Exactly. And I think about that all the time, specifically with octopuses more than fish these days.

Because I think it's honestly, now that I'm a little bit grown, I think that superior fish being would be much less likely than a superior cephalopod being. That seems very possible to me. They could do so much, they're so smart. I read this book called At Days, Close, A History of Nighttime that talks about what night was like in medieval Eurasia for people, like in, you know, like say the 10th century.

And people used to wake up for an hour or so at night. Yeah. And it was the separate period of consciousness and wakefulness when different things happened that just doesn't exist anymore, which I find quite strange. Yeah, well, we got better systems now, I guess.

I guess that's true. I mean, to some extent. It's not like as much to take care of in the middle of the night. That's true.

You get cold and you have to never walk on the fire, at least. All kinds of things. John, this next question comes from Clara. And I'm asking it because like, I, there are so many things that I should know and that I shouldn't be embarrassed to ask, including this one.

Dear Hank and John, why are there poems and quotes from other works in fiction books in between chapters in the beginning, etc. How did that become a thing? How does an author choose them? And do I have to read them?

I guess they might establish themes, but I must admit that I sometimes just skip them if I want to keep reading the story. Relistening to old episodes always calms my anxiety. So thanks Clara from Berlin. This is a great question, actually.

I read a book called The Art of the Epigraph by Rosemary Aherd, where I learned a lot about epigraphs. They really rose in prominence during the 18th century when writing and reading became more universal experiences in large parts of the world because before that, like, there's just like when you were reading, say, Ovid, there was just an expectation that you'd also read a bunch of other, you know, Roman poets. And so they would make references and assume that you knew them. Right.

And then there was this sort of tradition of collecting quotations from a lifetime of reading. Like the most famous example of this is this book, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations. It's like 2000 pages long and has thousands and thousands of quotes. What did it be like a big deal if you were a writer?

Would you be like fishing for a Bartlett's mention? Oh, for sure. I mean, that's being mentioned in Bartlett's even like 20 years ago was as close as most writers could expect to come to immortality. Okay.

It's wild how fast that changed. I mean, I still have three or four editions of Bartlett's. But now, of course, like, if you want to quote, the internet has them. They aren't accurate, but they have them.

So the use of these epigraphs is partly to talk about theme or to set a tone or to make reference to something that the book or the story or the chapter is a response to. It's also often used as a way of trying to like set expectations or put yourself as a writer in a certain category. But the thing that I found so so interesting about this is that almost from the moment epigraphs began to be used in fiction books, novelists began making up epigraphs. Like George Eliot, for instance, used fictional epigraphs in her work that didn't acknowledge their fictionality.

So almost from the beginning, fiction writers were playing with the idea of like, this is true, this isn't. And that's something that I liked so much that I did in The Fault in Their Stars. Like there's a made up epigraph in The Fault in Their Stars. I like epigraphs in general.

I like the most when they are made up. I mean, yeah, I love epigraphs in science fiction when it's a system of world building where you're like setting the stage and you're so in tone and like, and you're also like creating the existence of a book, an important book or an important thinker or author in that world who doesn't exist in our world. And it's always seemed to me a little bit pretentious, especially because it's oftentimes it's like holy books or like just deeply important, meaningful works of philosophy in the universe of science fiction. And then, but the author of the book is just writing this stuff that we are now supposed to as readers and, you know, we do.

Like imagine that as like world changing foundational philosophy for these people. But it's just like some guy named Frank came up with it. It's like you couldn't get away with it outside of an epigraph almost. Right.

That's that's exactly right. Do you you don't have epigraphs for either of your books, do you? No, I did not have God. I don't think you do.

I think I do. I didn't have one for looking for Alaska or an abundance of Catherine's. I had one for Turtles All The Way Down and then I had the made up one for Fault in Our Stars. I had one for Turtles All The Way Down because...

Just one at the beginning. Yeah, just one at the beginning. Man can do what he wills, but he cannot will what he wills, which is a Schopenhauer quote, which is pretentious philosophy. But I wanted to have it because I didn't know how else to say this is a book that never mentions the phrase free will that is about free will.

Right. I didn't know how it's to say that. And like maybe if the book is good enough, it can do that on its own. But I think it's I wanted to establish at the outset that like for me and for this book, the problem is not the question of will, it's the question of being able to will what you will.

There's a Turtles All The Way Down element to free will that I was also trying to explore alongside of like, you know, obsessiveness and recursion. Right. And so that was like a super useful quote for me in thinking as I was writing the book. And so I decided to put it in the book.

But I have often worried like, oh boy, it does it does set a bit of a pretentious tone. Yeah, there is an element of pretension. And like I didn't really get why until I wrote novels. But now when I read books that have epigraphs, I'm like, are you just bragging that you've like read a bunch of cool books?

Like it's what it feels like that you read in a sophisticated way that you like even know about this quote. How do you know about this? And sometimes I'm like, you deserve you absolutely deserve. And like, you know, oftentimes, novelists are English professors and professors of writing at universities.

And so like they do a lot of reading. So it makes sense that they would have this like big backlog of amazing thoughtful quotes. But like, I don't have that. So if I did a bunch of epigraphs before every chapter, I'd be on like quote a PDF or whatever every day and like just type in death and see what good death quotes there are this you don't have my way in.

You don't have like a like a Google Docker notebook you keep like when you read a book that you love that lines from it. No, John, all of my notebooks are full of like meetings from budget presentations. I mean, the Anthropocene reviewed book is probably 95% me taking that Google Doc and turning it into a book. Yeah, God.

It's just a stitch together of quotes that I love interspersed with a memoir. We're so we're so we have such similar paths, but such different minds. Yeah, although I will say that one thing I like about your writing, Hank, that I try to emulate in my own is that even though you are pretentious, there's no like question about it. You're a little bit pretentious as a writer, of course.

You are also self-aware. Like you understand what you're doing well enough to be able to make a little bit of fun of it. And the thing I find most unbearable about writers is when they they can't make fun of themselves. Like it's so cringy to me to hear and I won't name names, but like there are some very famous writers who genuinely think that they are geniuses and it's so uncomfortable.

And it also just like it tells a story to readers that isn't true. It tells a story of like, Oh, this, you know, I am a famous writer because of my incredible talent and because the muse whispers into my ear each morning the great love stories of our time. And I want to be like, No, you know, you're a regular person. I mean, all of it you come to understand is narrative building.

And so they want to build a story that people will understand as they read in the book about like the greatness of the author. And lots of authors do that. And like, I think that it can deepen your enjoyment of a book if you believe it. But we're kind of we've moved out of that part of our history, especially with like, I certainly could never make that case because like you've seen YouTube videos of me humping on Elksatju.

Right. Like I could never have pulled that off. I'm in the same boat. You have to be a little bit self-aware because you know that people are like, No, I know that guy.

He's an idiot. You've seen my TikTok. Yeah. Yeah.

Hank, this all reminds me of a great story about William Faulkner. So William Faulkner, who's an American novelist, I don't even know what the story is true, but I'm going to tell him. Okay. William Faulkner is like bird hunting with the famous American actor.

I don't even know who. Let's say Clark Gable. And they're talking about, they're with a couple other people and they're talking about writing. And Clark Gable says, Mr.

Faulkner, who are your favorite authors? And Faulkner says, Well, I suppose John does pass those and myself. And Clark Gable says, Oh, Mr. Faulkner, you write?

And Faulkner says, Yeah, Mr. Gable, what do you do? I mean, that is the crux of the story is correct. I found it and did I miss it?

Did I get Clark Gable right? No, it wasn't even an actor. It was a it was a newspaperman. It's a much better story with Clark Gable that he's like, What was do you write Mr.

Faulkner? And then he was and then he informed him that he had won the Nobel Prize in literature. Oh, dang. I guess that's it.

That's a pretty good comeback to be like, I do. Yes. And indeed, an Academy in Sweden acknowledged my contributions. Yeah, it's like when it's like when people ask me if it's my first VidCon.

It's a little different. It's a little different. It's a little different. People ask you if we have if we have a round any suspicion that we might be humble people.

We have now completely like made clear that that was an illusion. That is your Nobel Prize, Hank, is having founded VidCon. That is look, I got it's something which reminds me that today's podcast is brought to you by the Nobel Prize in literature, the Nobel Prize in literature soon to be one no question, no doubt by Hank Green. This podcast is also brought to you by my new podcast where I just read public domain books and then question mark and then profit.

I don't know. I still think that's a good idea. Today's podcast is also brought to you by Superior Sefal Vision and Feeling of All Ordinary Human Life. It would be like hearing the grass grow and the squirrel's heartbeat and we should die of that roller which lies on the other side of silence which is a great, great line.

Yeah, but you know what's overused because I've heard it. This episode of Peer Henk and John's Brump to you by Shopify, there are a lot of things we have between the idea is an idea that this is an idea that actually exists in the world and people are buying things from me and that is what Shopify makes easier when you start with Shopify the tools to design and launch and take payments. They're all there from day one. You don't have to build a whole machine before you can start building the business And this is important because you also have to look good and with Shopify's templates, you could get a site set up really quick that looks credible and professional without needing to code or duct tape a bunch of different tools together.

And when things look real, that works on my brain to be like, I'm doing a real thing. It also works on other people's brains to be like, this is legitimate. Shopify also has one of the best checkout systems on the internet. It's built to help customers finish the purchase effectively and efficiently without a bunch of roadblocks.

Returning customers can check out with a single click. That means less friction and fewer abandoned carts and a smoother experience for everybody. That stuff gives you confidence early on and it gives other people confidence in what you're doing. You're not wondering whether the payment system is going to work.

You're not wondering whether customers can get through the process. Shopify handles that foundation so you can focus on the thing that you're actually trying to do. It's really kind of amazing to me that Shopify is a tool that works from the first day your store launches when you're just starting to get customers all the way up to being the size of good.store or dftv.com or being the size of like Mattel and Gymshark. When you build a Shopify, you're building with tools that already work at every scale.

All you need is the idea, Shopify handles the rest. You can start your free trial at Shopify.com slash deerhank. Start your free trial at Shopify.com slash deerhank. With new subscription only, while supplies last until September 27th, 2026.

See website for more details. One thing I love about summer is how easy everything feels. The days are a little more relaxed. My kids don't have to wake up at five in the morning and I find myself reaching for the same comfortable go anywhere pieces again and again, which is why I keep coming back to quince.

I often wear either a long sleeve or a short sleeve button down from quince and it fits well and I never have any complaints. In fact, sometimes I get compliments about it. I was at the airport a couple days ago. I often find myself in airports and someone said, I like your shirt and I said, thanks.

It's from quince. Quince is 100% European linen pants and shirts are breathable, easy to throw on and the summer upgrade your rotation needs starting at just $34. Their teas are soft enough to live in all day and the lightweight cotton sweaters are exactly what you want when those summer nights cool down. So that's why I'm wearing quince this summer and you can make your summer wardrobe easier by going to quince.com slash deer hank for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns.

Now available in Canada too, that's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash deer hank for free shipping and 365 day returns quince.com slash deer hank. This episode of Deer hank, Adjourn is brought to you by Factor. Imagine for a moment that you are absolutely immersed in some work where you're creating something beautiful or useful or useless and ugly but you love it anyway and you look up and suddenly you have a feeling and that feeling is that it is 2.30 p.m and that you did not eat lunch. What do you want to do?

Are you going to get meal delivery that's going to cost too much and maybe be a bit of a mistake or are you going to go to the cupboard and just eat several fistfuls of peanuts? Those are my two choices unless I have a factor in the fridge. You can get smoky barbecue chicken breast with potato mash, cream corn and peppers. You can get creamy lemon pepper chicken with veggie rice, peel off broccoli and carrots.

This has the fiber I need. It has the protein I need and it has the deliciousness I need. What about garlic, herb, roasted, baromini with potato zucchini and burr blanc sauce? I don't really know what that means but it sounds delicious.

What about a black bean taco bowl with corn salsa and cilantro crema? A delicious high fiber high protein meal that no animals had to die for? Many of those can be ready in two minutes. Fresh, never frozen, over 100 rotating, weekly meals including globally inspired flavors like Mediterranean and Asian, Factor shops, Preps, Cooks and Delivers straight to your door so you have more time for everything you love this spring.

Head to factormeals.com slash deer hank 50 off and use the code deerhank50off to get 50% off and free daily greens per box. With new subscription only, wild supplies last until September 27th, 2026. See you website for more details. John, this next question comes from me.

Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey. You want me to interspersed some quotes from my quote document through the rest of the podcast? I'm happy to. Yeah.

Great. Actually, between every question for now, and before and after the news. Sure, John, this next question comes from Caleb who asks Dear Hank and John, I'm researching my little brother. When does researching become spying?

Caleb. I mean, immediately, right? Well, no, well because you already know everything about your little brother that you should know, because if you're like interviewing your little brother, if you say, Hey, you know, I'm going to get to know you a little bit better. And I'm wondering if I can ask you a few questions, what's your favorite color, what do you want to, you know, what do you want to be when you grow up stuff like that.

That's research. If you're like rifling through your little brother stuff, that's fine. What about asking questions of people in his life without him knowing? Oh, I think with a non-famous person, the line is whether or not they're aware of being researched.

And then I think with a famous person, the line is, hey, are you looking at me at a restaurant, which is spying or reading about them on Wikipedia, which is researching? Mm. There's got to be that. That was just two examples.

I want rules. I don't have firm rules, Hank. I know. That's the problem with the world.

Like, because ultimately, if you're going to write a biography of a person, you do kind of have to do some more research. You're going to have to get primary sources. And maybe if the person's dead, you're going to read all their old letters. That feels like spying.

Yeah, I think it's a place where it's really hard to know what the rules are, Hank, which actually reminds me of something Henry David Thoreau wrote in his journal. Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it. Wow. That's a good...

A hero week. Fantastic. Yeah. Well, can you just answer questions from our listeners with just dope quotes?

Well, Hank, you don't want William Carlos Williams says, no ideas but in things. Well, let's have this be a thing, man. This question's from Sydney who has steer Hank and John. I'm a longtime listener.

And I've noticed that you guys frequently talk about how arbitrary categories are. You've touched on why categories are flawed, but in what ways are they useful? Why do we have to group stuff together with stuff that is similar, but not the same? Continents and categories, Sydney.

Can you do it? What do you got in there? All right, Hank, as Audrey Lord wrote, it is through poetry that we give names to those ideas which are until the poem nameless and formless about to be birthed but already felt. And what I mean by that is that one of the main things categories can do is give us names and form for ideas that are difficult to find language for.

Categories can be a way of creating language around something. The problem is when we forget that we are creating that language. Yeah, but it's completely understandable that we would have that reaction when language is so often a filter through which we understand our world. We just have to push against that.

Yeah, it reminds me of something that Mary Oliver once wrote. Oh gosh. The one world we all belong to where everything sooner or later is part of everything else. There are no categories, Hank, because everything sooner or later is part of everything else.

God John, I'm shocked. I could do this all day. That first quote, I did not believe that you're going to be able to do that at all. Let alone find a quote that was like actually very app-repot.

And then that second one also very good in that moment. So I'm feeling outclassed, frankly. Do you want to do that? He's from Mars and Icey Wimbledon.

Yeah, but first I need to quote John Paul the second. It's probably unfortunately he never said this, which is a real bummer. He was a big football fan, but he probably never actually said of all the unimportant things football is the most important, but it's so true. And of course of all of the football teams, AFC Wimbledon is the most important, Hank.

Yeah. It's not good. It's not a good situation in South London at the moment on a lot of levels. But the level at which we talk about on the podcast is the third tier English football level.

AFC Wimbledon have garnered just a single point, one draw from their last seven league games. That's not good. You want at least one point per game on average. You don't want one seventh of a point per game on average.

So it's a really difficult time. Now obviously a bunch of players having COVID or having to self-isolate during this period has not been helpful, but yikes. It's not great. And it's definitely at this point capital W worrisome.

I would say that we're in a level three or four emergency at this point. We're at the point where I feel like I need to open up the window from level three and say, like, buy some players and then Wimbledon shouts back. We don't have any money. Can you give us some?

I'm sorry. So that's not good, but Hank, I have good news. I have really good news. There's a knockout competition that AFC Wimbledon plays in.

Unfortunately, it's called the Papa John's Trophy. Oh no. You know, it has a naming sponsor and over the years it's had some good sponsors. And now it's got a really somehow or another AFC Wimbledon have managed to make it to the last eight of this competition.

Weird. I know. One of the wrong games. I am aware we are definitely winning the wrong games, but we've eaten some pretty good teams on our way to the top eight.

And now amazingly Wimbledon are just two wins away from playing at Wembley, England's national stadium in front of no fans for the Papa John's Trophy, a real thing that you can win in sports. But I mean, Hank, it's a real competition. And I mean, I guess we could theoretically win it. We don't know who we're playing in the next round yet.

That draw does not happen until January 23. But it could be Sunderland, which is this team that plays in the third tier of English football, even though they have like 30,000 season ticket holders and pay individual players more than AFC Wimbledon's entire budget for the season. But it could also be in the next round the franchise currently playing its great in Milton Keynes. Really?

Yeah. They also made it to the eight. They also made it to the final eight. That's very weird because they're not good either.

They're not good. But this is a competition to be clear that mostly pits not good teams against each other. It used to be known as the John Stones paint trophy. If you remember that from previous episodes of the plot, because I know you have a photographic memory of every time I talk about the news from AFC Wimbledon and you don't zone out at all.

What's the news from Mars? And this from Mars was also some sad news that we have officially ended the professional career of the Insight Moll. So it is now just a piece of technology sitting on the surface of Mars that we're not going to try and do anything else with. So this thing, the heat flow and physical properties package that was deployed as part of the Insight Lander to dig into Mars and learn about the planet.

And it was supposed to go like really deep into the planet, tell us a bunch about how heat moves around inside of Mars would tell us a lot about the crust of Mars. Turns out the soil is tricky. And probably what happened is that there's just not enough friction in the soil to hold it. And so it was just bouncing up and down in the ground.

And after all of the work that was done to try and get this thing down 10 feet, it only went down about two centimeters. So on January 9th, the team decided to officially end the end of the mission, that part of the Insight mission. Now always when you fail at something on Mars, well not always, but often when you fail at something on Mars. And in this case, you do learn things, the structure of the soil, for example, we also learned that it's hard to get a dig or in.

So we would have to do that in a different way if we tried to do it in the future. And also we learned how to use the robotic arm of the Insight Lander in strange ways that it was not designed to do. So maybe we will do that again in the future. It wasn't like it was just like I think it just didn't even turn on and didn't do anything.

We did get some useful data out of it. It just wasn't about the heat of the interior of Mars, which is what we were going for. Dang it. Yeah, that really is too bad because I know all those scientists built the thing on Earth to try to figure out what the issues could be.

Oh, yeah. And that's disappointing. So there's a lot we won't be learning about the seismic activity on Mars that we were hoping to better understand about Mars Quakes. Yeah, we still have good data on Mars Quakes.

And inside is still one of the things that it does is it is able to use earthquakes to sort of map the interior of Mars. This was to be able to detect how heat would move around inside of the planet would tell us different things about the interior. It reminds me of something that Carl Sagan wrote once. Maybe we're on Mars because of the magnificent science that can be done there, that the gates of the wonder world are opening in our time.

Or maybe we're on Mars because we have to be because there's a deep, nomadic impulse built into us by the evolutionary process. We come after all from hunter-gatherers and for 99.9% of our tenure on Earth, we've been wanderers. And the next place to wander to is Mars. It's true.

Great. He was good at that. Next place to wander to Hank. He was good at that.

But not until at least 2028. That was the last thing that Carl Sagan said in that long quote about Mars. He said we should go to Mars. We should.

It's so important. It is. But not until 2028. Carl Sagan.

John, thank you for making a podcast with me. We're off to record our Patreon Only podcast this week and stuff where we talk about stuff that we like this week. Hopefully, there will be some of that. And you can find out more at patreon.com slash dear Hank and John.

And all that money goes to help fund all the things that we do at Complexly. This podcast is edited by Joseph Tuna-Medis. It's produced by Rosie Anna Halser-Hossen. Jared and Gibson.

Our communications coordinator is Julia Bloom. Our editorial assistant is the bookie trucker Vardy. The music you're hearing now and it's the beginning of the podcast by the great controller. And as they say in our hometown, don't forget to be awesome.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Dear Hank & John?

This episode is 41 minutes long.

When was this Dear Hank & John episode published?

This episode was published on January 25, 2021.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Dear Hank & John episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.