3 Reasons Given in the Granted Appellate Motion for Oral Argument, Allen v. IN

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the appeal styled as Richard Allen v. State of Indiana discussing the status of the appeal. This is the high profile "Delphi case" where Appellant is seeking a new trial or in the alternative remanding to the trial court for a "Franks" hearing. We discuss an appellate order entered on May 14, 2026 granting Mr. Allen's motion for oral argument and address the three reasons proffered by him in that motion which persuaded the appellate panel oral argument should be granted. The May 14, 2026 appellate order and April 28, 2026 Motion for Oral Argument (public records) appear on our YT channel here: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZ... Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #RichardAllen#DelphiAppeal#AllenvIndiana#AbbyandLibby#FreeSpeech