Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here, we discuss the issue that defense expert Sy Ray who published a book and gave a recent podcast interview on the Idaho v Kohberger case which appears to be in conflict with his role as a defense expert and more critically as part of Mr. Kohberger's proposed alibi. Link to Defense's March 2025 filing RE: Mr. Ray as alibi to Mr. Kohberger - Nov. 13, 2022:https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxQfnpg3br9LNYiaX1h7aslsdbpnm6rk_E verything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here, we discuss the issue that defense expert Sy Ray who published a book and gave an interview on Custody Queens podcast on the Idaho v Kohberger case which appears to be in conflict with his role as a defense expert and more critically as part of Mr. Kohberger's proposed alibi. A playlist of our past content regarding Mr. Kohberger, Mr. Ray and the alibi defense:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLc40a647c19kEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#SyRay#AlibiDefense#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile federal civil lawsuit brought by the families of the four students who were tragically lost at 1122 King Road, Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University. While the docket reveals no filings since June 12, 2026, an important deadline is coming up on July 27, 2026 with discovery ongoing that suggests the case in proceeding without formal docket updates. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A public records lawsuit was filed by EWU Media against the City of Moscow and Moscow Police Department concerning allegations of violations of the Idaho Public Records Act and. The Respondents have now filed a Supplemental Response denying allegations of wrongdoing supported by the Moscow PD's Chief of Police Declaration. Here we discuss the Conclusion of the Response(more than 30 pages) to help orient the reader on why they deny all wrongdoing in responding to Public Records Requests. Link to Part I: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpLvXzSj5iEEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A public records lawsuit was filed by EWU Media against the City of Moscow and Moscow Police Department concerning allegations of violations of the Idaho Public Records Act and. The Respondents have now filed a Supplemental Response denying allegations of wrongdoing supported by the Moscow PD's Chief of Police Declaration. Here we discuss the Introduction of the Response(more than 30 pages) to help orient the reader of what follows. LINK to YT Channel Community Page Discussed Here: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxSyO2kziC1CSHqCT6AbKWkFTHbL1244iBEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning a court case that has been opened in Pasco County, Florida styled as Florida v. Jonathan Lee Riches. We provide an update relying on the First Amendment which is quoted to and cited in this presentation regarding this matter that has been brought against the popular true crime content creator a notice sent to him to appear at a pre-trial conference, warning if he does not to so a warrant will be issued. LINK to Notice Sent to Defendant by Court: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxkWjpm9YCmG1uyAnYpWYj5t8Ow9qPX3ADEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. A defendant in a criminal proceeding is clothed with the presumption of innocence at all times relevant until or unless he/she pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. The government bears the burden of proof at beyond a reasonable doubt evidentiary standard to prove all elements of any alleged crime charged.#FLvJLR#JonathanLeeRiches#DueProcess

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A public records lawsuit was filed by EWU Media against the City of Moscow and Moscow Police Department concerning allegations of violations of the Idaho Public Records Act and. The Respondents have now filed a Supplemental Response denying allegations of wrongdoing supported by the Moscow PD's Chief of Police Declaration. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey provides why he believes "at least two suspects" committed the crimes at 1122 King Road on November 13, 2022.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#FirstAmendment#USConstitution

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey addresses possible staging of the crime scene to show no footsteps tracking of the perpetrator(s) movements in the house. Link to Bates 004039 of the Turvey Report CLICK HERE: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxmXF7yf02DYGh-_RnfziUCiR1XaEHp2I_Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey addresses what he believes is a below-standard of care job performed by the Moscow Police Department regarding crime scene security, interviews and suspect identifications..LINK to the portion of the Turvey Report Discussed here:CLICK: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNeEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey relates who he opines was the target of the attack of Nov. 13, 2022 referred to as "Retaliatory" in nature. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey opines that the Ka-Bar sheath, the key piece of evidence in the case against Mr. Kohberger, is discussed here.LINK to the Community Page of our YT channel where the 2 Bates Stated public records CLICK: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#Evidence#FreeSpeech#USConstitution

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming May 18, 2026 hearing on a public records lawsuit before Judge Megan E. Marshall - EWU Media LLC vs. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Department. This is the first known lawsuit that we understand has been filed by a party seeking via public records requests concerning the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Road and Idaho v. Kohberger.. July 10, 2026 was the deadline for the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. to respond to EWU's allegations of violations of the Idaho Public Records Act. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. First AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#EWUvMoscowMPD#IdahoPublicRecordsAct

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025 when Mr. Kohberger was transferred to an Idaho State maximum security prison to begin serving his sentences. Here we note that the Case Summary Page which had been "missing in action" is back on the court docket today July 9, 2026. We address what the purpose of the Case Summary is, and note some interesting aspects to the current document.Link to Our YT channel where this public record, Pages 1, 56 and 57 appear, and are discussed here: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxIBhbjEYLBYFvmDnvUQ-gEqbpqMC934oqEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#FreeSpeech#FreePress ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger when on this date the court released a State Expert Witness Report (with previously unreleased evidence) and other documents filed March 3, 2025 ordered to be unsealed Dec. 18, 2025. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#Idahov. Kohberger

Here, we provide Members Only content based on pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the current status of the EWU Media v. City of Moscow/MPD lawsuit which has been proceeding before Judge Marshall in Latah County since February 2026. What Has Happened Thus Far? What is Expected to Possibly Occur in the Near Future? LINK to Playlist on the Lawsuit:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbLUtgSDXdFPt8nqgkLpSBcZFxtS2cYepEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. 

Here we provide pure comments, speculation and opinions concerning the criminal action currently proceeding in Pasco Co, Florida styled as Florida v. JL Riches following a July 2, 2026 hearing before Judge Justice. Link to our YT Channel Community Page discussed herein:https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxCdJLZS7alSOMXufEdc0dZG4oId-rgMDVEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#FreeSpeech#FreePress#FLvRiches#DueProcess #SpeedyTrial

n February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we provide an update regarding the Respondents response to the Petition alleging violations of the Idaho Public Records Act on or before July 10, 2026. One of the items sought is the December 30, 2022 Interogation/Interview video of Mr. Kohberger by Det. Payne and Det. Gilbertson. We ask the rhetorical question if you believe EWU will be successful in obtaining the same, never seen by the public. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculations regarding the process of unsealing the long-closed case by the trial court and also of the status of the court's investigation into the "leak" of under seal documents. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#FreeSpeech#FreePress#IdahovKohberger

In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we note that in one of EWU's public records requests included in the lawsuit is a specific reference to the infamous "8 hour gap" from the times the state alleges the crimes occurred to when the 911 call was placed. In addition to being the court entertaining the EWU public records lawsuit, Judge Marshall also signed off on the warrant for Mr. Kohberger's arrest based on the Dec. 29, 2022 Affidavit of Probable Cause. LINK to our YT channel community page: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxMY9_zlikGtmoilDMY854dtpSVkdEyZgYEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we respond to inquiries asking what specifically with EWU request in their public records requests regarding the 1122 King/Kohberger investigation. Link to our YT Community Page RE: EWU's requests: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxMY9_zlikGtmoilDMY854dtpSVkdEyZgY Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations regarding three (3) things that could be expected to happen if Mr. Kohberger files a Petition for Post Conviction Relief, Citing to ID Code § 19-4906 (2025). LINK to Poll Discussed in this Podcast Episode: https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx3LnUjC9fn_dexwzKUEUL3Z6lteN_NEd0Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#PostConvictionRelief#FreeSpeech#FreePress#BryanKohberger

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the high-profile federal civil lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al. vs. Washington State University. The same has been proceeding since late January 2026 in federal court. The Plaintiffs are the personal representatives of the estates of four students who were catastrophically lost on November 13, 2022 at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho. Here we discuss an important deadline coming up in July regarding the amendment of pleadings. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.#Idaho4#WSU#TitleIX#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the matter styled as Erick Hall v. State of Idaho, a high profile post conviction relief matter denied by Judge Hippler as we continue to monitor the docket for any such PCR filings by Mr. Kohberger as the SOL to do so is rapidly approaching. Please take our poll regarding whether you believe Mr. Kohberger will move for PCR before the SOL expires here:https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx3LnUjC9fn_dexwzKUEUL3Z6lteN_NEd0Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#PostConvictionRelief#FreePress#FreeSpeech #HallvIdaho

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the lack of any evidence Mr. Kohberger has filed a Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, with the one-year statute of limitations continuing to run. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#PostConvictionRelief#FreeSpeech#FreePress

In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we provide an update regarding a key event that is scheduled to occur on July 10, 2026 and others leading up to the hearing on August 5, 2026. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming August 5, 2026 oral argument in the EWU Media v. Moscow/MPD public records lawsuit. Now that Judge Marshall has denied Moscow/MPD's Request to Dismiss the case, what may the public expect to occur in weeks leading up to the hearing on whether there have been violations of the Idaho Public Records Act? EWU v. Moscow/MPD Playlist discussed in this podcast episode:   • The Public Records Act Lawsuit: EWU v. Mos...  Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. First AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger pled guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. A year after the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal.In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. The Respondents filed a request to dismiss the lawsuit, which Judge Marshall has denied. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#EWUMedia#KohbergerFiles

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation based on the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution regarding the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie on February 2, 2026 from her home in Tucson, Arizona and discuss two other past cases and the significance of the "see something/say something" protocol. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #NancyGuthrie#SavannahGuthrie#SeeSomethingSaySomething#KathysIndieZone

Here as our nation is about to celebrate its 250th year, we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning a quote one of the SCOTUS justices provided raising concerns about plea deals replacing jury trials and how it might have caused concerns to the framers of the U.S. Constitution in the matter styled as Hunter vs. United States (addressing appellate waivers).Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#HuntervUS#IdahovKohberger#SCOTUS

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning discussions that Mr. Kohberger filed a petition for post-conviction relief in the lawsuit concerning the Idaho Statesman's efforts to obtain under-seal documentation relative to the costs of the criminal case styled as Idaho v. Kohberger.LINK to our YT Channel Community Page: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxxYQrpxovZbLMaBjUnLpog80otQQfj8OIEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#PostConvictionRelief#FreeSpeech#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard which resulted in a $10 million judgment in Plaintiff's favor following a jury trial. The defense filed an appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal with her Initial Brief on the Merits due June 29, 2026. It was not however filed that day and here we explain why. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4#RebeccaScofield#AshleyGuillard#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning Goncalves et al v. Washington State University and the first deadline per the June 1, 2026 federal court's order regarding joinder of third parties. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

ere we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning a 6-3 United States Supreme Court ruling on June 29, 2026 in Chatrie v. US finding that the use of "geofence warrants" was a search as contemplated by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requiring a warrant (with few exceptions).LINK to our community page discussed here: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/postsEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#ChatrievUS#FourthAmendment#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the seven (7) separate categories of reasons for post-conviction relief under the Idaho statute. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#HuntervUS#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the 2025 civil defamation case styled as Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron v. Candace Owens et al., where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Ms. Owens alleging she defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man and both Mr. and Mrs. Macron in alleging they both committed fraud regarding the same. Here we provide an up-to-the minute status on the hearing on the defense motion to dismiss which has been reset three times. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#PresidentMacron#FirstLadyMacron#BrigitteMacron#CandaceOwens#Defamation

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the type of filing a Petitioner in Idaho seeking to file a post-conviction relief action challenging their sentence/conviction Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the high-profile case of Idaho v. Wondra, the docket is available for the public to view free of charge on the Idaho Supreme Court's Cases of Judicial Interest website. The defense has filed a Motion to Dismiss both counts that he is scheduled to stand trial on in September 2026 on the grounds of a lack of probable cause. This case involves the tragic disappearance of Michael Vaughn from his hometown of Fruitland near the Oregon-Idaho border that occurred in the summer of 2021. No legal advice is offered or intended. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#MichaelVaughn#IdahovWondra#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech

Here, we provide an update regarding the current status of the unsealing of the highly-sealed high-profile Idaho v Kohberger criminal case by Judge Hippler which was deemed closed on July 23, 2025, the day of Mr. Kohberger's sentencing. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here, we proffer pure opinions, commentary, speculation and a discussion of the key factors and arguments Mr. Kohberger would need to raise in any ineffective assistance of counsel argument in violation of the Idaho State Constitution seeking post-judgment relief (Caution: This is a hypothetical exercise intended to discuss SCOTUS case law such as Garza v. Idaho, Hunter v. United States, and Strickland v. Washington, there is no indication at the present time Mr. Kohberger intends to appeal his convictions or sentences). Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#HunbervUS#FreeSpeech#FreePress

Here, we proffer pure opinions, commentary, speculation and a discussion of the key factors and arguments Mr. Kohberger would need to raise in any 6th Amendment-based ineffective assistance of counsel argument seeking post-judgment relief (Caution: This is a hypothetical exercise intended to discuss SCOTUS case law such as Garza v. Idaho, Hunter v. United States, and Strickland v. Washington, there is no indication at the present time Mr. Kohberger intends to appeal his convictions or sentences). Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#SCOTUS#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger

Here, we proffer pure opinions, commentary, speculation and a discussion of the two legal standards Mr. Kohberger would need to meet to appeal his sentence per the remedies provided in Section 19-4901 and the SCOTUS recent decision in Hunter v. United States. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4#HuntervUS#AppealWaiver#IdahoPostConvictionLaw#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation regarding the public records lawsuit styled as EWU Media LLC v. City of Moscow and the Moscow Police Department, that has been proceeding in Latah County, Idaho since February and is centered on public records requests concerning the Idaho v. Kohberger case. This is an update on where matters stand.,Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#EWUMedia#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech#FreePress

Here we provide complete opinions, comment and speculation regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's June 18, 2026 decision in the landmark Hunter v. U.S. case & discuss the June 29, 2025 Kohberger Waiver of Constitutional Rights form. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#SCOTUS#Idaho4#HuntervUS#IdahovKohberger

Here we discuss the fact that while 353 days have passed since Mr. Kohberger's change of plea hearing on July 2, 2025, the highly sealed case of Idaho v. Kohberger continues to be largely sealed from the public. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4 #IdahovKohberger #FreeSpeech #FreePressAmend. I, US Const. (Opinion)

Here we discuss the new "miscarriage of justice" national policy announced on June 18, 2026 by SCOTUS in a 5 page decision on Hunter v. United States regarding appellate waivers. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#USConstitution#HuntervUS#IdahovKohberger#FifthAmendment#14thAmendment#DueProcess#FirstAmendment

Here, we discuss the issue that defense expert Sy Ray who is publishing a book on the Idaho v Kohberger case was also offered by the defense to serve as a partial corroborator of Mr. Kohberger's alibi to establish he could not have committed the crimes at 1122 King Road because, according to the alibi defense, he was nowhere near Moscow at the time.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4 #IdahovKohberger #AlibiDefenseAmend I US Const.

Here we discuss the Supreme Court's ruling today June 18, 2026 in Hunter v. United States regarding appellate waivers. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment while discussing a forthcoming US Supreme Court proceeding that could change the legal standard for those who wish to set aside plea deals revisiting the Supreme Court's 2019 precedent in Garza v. Idaho. A ruling on the SCOTUS case of Hunter v. US regarding appellate waivers could change the law making a Kohberger appeal a possibility (Note: there is no indication at the present time he intends to appeal his sentence, however, per the First Amendment we pose the rhetorical question of might this be a potential post-Hunter?)The rhetorical question is also discussed raising pure opinions, comments and speculation as to whether this might change the legal climate should Mr. Kohberger the defendant in Idaho v. Kohberger seek at some point in future to challenge his appeal waiver set forth within his plea agreement. Note: There is no indication Mr. Kohberger has sought/will seek to challenge his plea deal as of the time of the recording of this presentation. LINK to SCOTUS Oral Argument Page: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arg...LINK to Hunter vs. United States SCOTUS case file: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/d...Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. In addition to the $10M judgment Plaintiff Scofield received following jury trial, she has now been awarded $27,000 in attorney's fees. The matter is being appealed. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.