Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning a court order that was rendered on January 29, 2026 - the first filing on the docket in over 3 weeks - which grants the State's Motion to Reconsider Unsealing Documents per the 3rd Court Order to unseal issued October 16, 2025. The same relates to documents under seal from Jan., Feb. and March 2025 including evidence. In doing so, the Court has reversed a decision to unseal specific documents contained in a December 18, 2025 order. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ #BryanKohberger (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4⁠⁠) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho..⁠⁠. (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...⁠⁠) ) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...⁠⁠) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan..⁠⁠.

Here, we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculating following defense expert Sy Ray's recent statements to the effect Mr. Kohberger may be seeking to appeal his conviction based on a "miscarriage of justice" the legal standard announced by SCOTUS recently in Hunter v. US, the case decided 8-1 on June 18, 2026 which gave birth to the "miscarriage of justice" standard when defendants sign away appellate rights as Mr. Kohberger did. We provide pure opinions and comments regarding the important role the public plays in the criminal justice system that was before SCOTUS in Hunter and the language of the Hunter standard to assert the public's interests have been heard. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#HuntervUS#IdahovKohberger#SCOTUS#USConstitution#FreedomofSpeech#FreedomofthePress

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here, we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculating following defense expert Sy Ray's recent statements to the effect Mr. Kohberger may be seeking to appeal his conviction based on a "miscarriage of justice" the legal standard announced by SCOTUS recently in Hunter v. US. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#HuntervUnitedStates#MiscarriageofJusstice#FreeSpeech

Here, we provide commentary, opinions and pure speculation regarding the 1991 conviction of New Hampshire teacher Pamela Smart who was accused of convincing her 15 year student to un-alive her 23 year old husband, Gregory Smart. This past week, Ms. Smart was back in a New Hampshire courtroom at a hearing on her Petition for Habeas Corpus in seeking to have her conviction thrown out. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #PamelaSmart#GregorySmart#NewHampshirevSmart#FreeSpeech#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments and speculation regarding the apparent stoppage of the unsealing process of the highly-sealed high-profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger pursuant to a process previously announced by Judge Steven J. Hippler. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #KielyRodni (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/kiely...)

Here, we provide complete opinions, commentary and speculation concerning 3 important deadlines coming up during the week of July 27, 2026 relative to Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University, the Scofield v. Guillard appeal (Idaho4 Defamation Case) and EWU Media LLC v. City of Moscow v. Moscow Police Dept. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #KielyRodni

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning a federal defamation lawsuit filed by the father and grandfather of teenager Kiely Rodni who disappeared and was tragically found un-alived in 2022 against on-line content creator/musician Ryan Upchurch resulting in a verdict following jury trial in the amount of $17.5 million. Mr. Upchurch has filed a post-judgment motion in district court, a motion for judgment as a matter of law. Our prior content asking the rhetorical question if Mr. Upchurch would appeal this $17.5 million judgment:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzGqoKeVGXMEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #KielyRodni#RyanUpchurch#FreeSpeech

Here, we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation pursuant to Amend. I US Constitution regarding the outcome of a February 24, 2023 notice of (sealed) Brady information/internal affairs investigation as to one of the law enforcement officers involved in the case. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#BradyDisclosure#FreeSpeech#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger and the possibility, options & deadline for post-conviction relief for Mr. Kohberger per Idaho's Post-Conviction Relief Statute. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#HuntervUnitedStates#PostConvictionRelief#FreeSpeech#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the status of the high profile federal lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University, focusing on a key court-ordered deadline coming up on July 27, 2026. This federal proceeding is being prosecuted by the families of the four student catastrophically lost on November 13, 2022 at 1122 King Road.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. One year since the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal.A lawsuit has been filed by EWU Media LLC who has alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we provide pure opinions, comments and speculation regarding the status of matters in the public records lawsuit leading up to a hearing on August 5, 2026. A hearing is scheduled in May on EWU's petition. Here we discuss an amended order entered by Judge Megan E. Marshall concerning the case. This is a current status of the case. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #EWUMedia#1122KingRoad#BryanKohberger#FreeSpeech#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger and ask the rhetorical question: Does recent public records request share on YT by Connor establish that Det. Brett Payne, lead detective in the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Road and Mr. Kohberger and thus the State of Idaho was aware of Brent L.K., a topic which has been hotly debated and discussed in the community. LINK: To YT Channel Community Page with Receipts RE: Final Days of the case: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZ... here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#BrentLK#IdahovKohberger#FreeSpeech#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which remains almost as highly sealed as it was when the case was in active pre-trial, a case that was closed one year ago on July 23, 2025 when Mr. Kohberger was sentenced. Are answers found in the documents filed in the final days of the case that induced Mr. Kohberger to change his plea from not guilty to guilty as he did on July 2, 2025, which came as a surprise to many in the public. LINK: To YT Channel Community Page with Receipts RE: Final Days of the case: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/postsEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we discuss for educational purposes and based on pure opinions, commentary and speculations as to the federal civil rights lawsuit filed by Alex Murdaugh against Rebecca "Becky" Hill former Clerk of Court after two convictions for the unalivings of his wife and son were thrown out by the South Carolina Supreme Court due to actions attributed to Ms. Hill. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. This matter resulted in a $10 million verdict in favor of Plaintiff Scofield, which Defendant Guillard has appealed to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. Link to our past content on this lawsuit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Di9KPGcFJiwEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations and ask rhetorical questions in the form of an update into an Idaho Department of Investigations Official Investigation concerning possible "leaked" video of Mr. Kohberger purportedly inside the maximum security prison where he was sentenced to begin serving out his life term outside of Boise effective July 23, 2025.Link to 2025 Update RE this matter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoNY9-28uzk Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here, we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation regarding defense expert Sy Ray's statements in a recent interview that Mr. Kohberger might be considering a potential appeal of his conviction; and the compelling use of the term "miscarriage of justice" while doing so, a possible reference to the June 2026 Supreme Court landmark ruling of Hunter v US where waiver of appellate rights may be overcome. The crucial deadline for Mr. Kohberger to file a Petition for Post Conviction Relief is rapidly approaching, causing us to ask the rhetorical question of will he or won't Mr. Kohberger file? Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the civil defamation case styled as Macron v. Owens, where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Candace Owens alleging the defendant defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man. Ms. Owens Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit or strike parts of the Amended Complaint we note the First Amendment as the very first reason for granting Ms. Owens the relief she seeks. This motion has been set for hearing three times, with the third hearing currently set for late July 2026. We ask the rhetorical question: Will the lawsuit survive the motion or will it be dismissed? Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the matter styled as Richard M. Allen v. State of Indiana also known as the "Delphi Appeal" and relate information on how the public may watch the forthcoming appellate oral argument where Mr. Allen is seeking reversal of his convictions or in the alternative of an order granting a "Franks" hearing. Link to our YT channel as discussed herein:    https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxL3IZ6WlcD8fdJmip8HDegg4zw1xoEHjv Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #AbbyandLibby#AllenvIndiana#DelphiAppeal#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger relative to its unsealing a year after the case was closed. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. More than eight months after the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal.A lawsuit has been filed by EWU Media LLC who has alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Defendants Moscow/MPD have filed correspondence from the federal authorities concerning records provided in assisting in the investigation of the crimes at 1122 King Road and are asking to have the currently pending hearing (oral argument) set for May 18, 2026 to be rescheduled for the reasons set forth in the Defense's motion to continue. This is a current status of the case. Here we provide an update as to the status of the EWU Media v. City of Moscow/MPD public records requests lawsuit and a current status of litigation. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4#EWUvMoscowMPD#IPRA#PublicRecords#FirstAmendment

Here, we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation regarding defense expert Sy Ray's statements in a recent interview that Mr. Kohberger might be considering a potential appeal of his conviction; and the compelling use of the term "miscarriage of justice" while doing so, a possible reference to the June 2026 Supreme Court landmark ruling of Hunter v US.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here, we discuss the issue that defense expert Sy Ray who published a book and gave a recent podcast interview on the Idaho v Kohberger case which appears to be in conflict with his role as a defense expert and more critically as part of Mr. Kohberger's proposed alibi. Link to Defense's March 2025 filing RE: Mr. Ray as alibi to Mr. Kohberger - Nov. 13, 2022:https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxQfnpg3br9LNYiaX1h7aslsdbpnm6rk_E verything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here, we discuss the issue that defense expert Sy Ray who published a book and gave an interview on Custody Queens podcast on the Idaho v Kohberger case which appears to be in conflict with his role as a defense expert and more critically as part of Mr. Kohberger's proposed alibi. A playlist of our past content regarding Mr. Kohberger, Mr. Ray and the alibi defense:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLc40a647c19kEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#SyRay#AlibiDefense#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile federal civil lawsuit brought by the families of the four students who were tragically lost at 1122 King Road, Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University. While the docket reveals no filings since June 12, 2026, an important deadline is coming up on July 27, 2026 with discovery ongoing that suggests the case in proceeding without formal docket updates. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A public records lawsuit was filed by EWU Media against the City of Moscow and Moscow Police Department concerning allegations of violations of the Idaho Public Records Act and. The Respondents have now filed a Supplemental Response denying allegations of wrongdoing supported by the Moscow PD's Chief of Police Declaration. Here we discuss the Conclusion of the Response(more than 30 pages) to help orient the reader on why they deny all wrongdoing in responding to Public Records Requests. Link to Part I: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpLvXzSj5iEEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A public records lawsuit was filed by EWU Media against the City of Moscow and Moscow Police Department concerning allegations of violations of the Idaho Public Records Act and. The Respondents have now filed a Supplemental Response denying allegations of wrongdoing supported by the Moscow PD's Chief of Police Declaration. Here we discuss the Introduction of the Response(more than 30 pages) to help orient the reader of what follows. LINK to YT Channel Community Page Discussed Here: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxSyO2kziC1CSHqCT6AbKWkFTHbL1244iBEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning a court case that has been opened in Pasco County, Florida styled as Florida v. Jonathan Lee Riches. We provide an update relying on the First Amendment which is quoted to and cited in this presentation regarding this matter that has been brought against the popular true crime content creator a notice sent to him to appear at a pre-trial conference, warning if he does not to so a warrant will be issued. LINK to Notice Sent to Defendant by Court: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxkWjpm9YCmG1uyAnYpWYj5t8Ow9qPX3ADEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. A defendant in a criminal proceeding is clothed with the presumption of innocence at all times relevant until or unless he/she pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. The government bears the burden of proof at beyond a reasonable doubt evidentiary standard to prove all elements of any alleged crime charged.#FLvJLR#JonathanLeeRiches#DueProcess

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A public records lawsuit was filed by EWU Media against the City of Moscow and Moscow Police Department concerning allegations of violations of the Idaho Public Records Act and. The Respondents have now filed a Supplemental Response denying allegations of wrongdoing supported by the Moscow PD's Chief of Police Declaration. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey provides why he believes "at least two suspects" committed the crimes at 1122 King Road on November 13, 2022.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#FirstAmendment#USConstitution

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey addresses possible staging of the crime scene to show no footsteps tracking of the perpetrator(s) movements in the house. Link to Bates 004039 of the Turvey Report CLICK HERE: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxmXF7yf02DYGh-_RnfziUCiR1XaEHp2I_Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey addresses what he believes is a below-standard of care job performed by the Moscow Police Department regarding crime scene security, interviews and suspect identifications..LINK to the portion of the Turvey Report Discussed here:CLICK: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNeEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#FirstAmendment#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey relates who he opines was the target of the attack of Nov. 13, 2022 referred to as "Retaliatory" in nature. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025. A newly released defense report of Dr. Brent Turvey opines that the Ka-Bar sheath, the key piece of evidence in the case against Mr. Kohberger, is discussed here.LINK to the Community Page of our YT channel where the 2 Bates Stated public records CLICK: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#Evidence#FreeSpeech#USConstitution

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming May 18, 2026 hearing on a public records lawsuit before Judge Megan E. Marshall - EWU Media LLC vs. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Department. This is the first known lawsuit that we understand has been filed by a party seeking via public records requests concerning the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Road and Idaho v. Kohberger.. July 10, 2026 was the deadline for the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. to respond to EWU's allegations of violations of the Idaho Public Records Act. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. First AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#EWUvMoscowMPD#IdahoPublicRecordsAct

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025 when Mr. Kohberger was transferred to an Idaho State maximum security prison to begin serving his sentences. Here we note that the Case Summary Page which had been "missing in action" is back on the court docket today July 9, 2026. We address what the purpose of the Case Summary is, and note some interesting aspects to the current document.Link to Our YT channel where this public record, Pages 1, 56 and 57 appear, and are discussed here: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxIBhbjEYLBYFvmDnvUQ-gEqbpqMC934oqEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#IdahovKohberger#FreeSpeech#FreePress ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger when on this date the court released a State Expert Witness Report (with previously unreleased evidence) and other documents filed March 3, 2025 ordered to be unsealed Dec. 18, 2025. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#Idahov. Kohberger

Here, we provide Members Only content based on pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the current status of the EWU Media v. City of Moscow/MPD lawsuit which has been proceeding before Judge Marshall in Latah County since February 2026. What Has Happened Thus Far? What is Expected to Possibly Occur in the Near Future? LINK to Playlist on the Lawsuit:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbLUtgSDXdFPt8nqgkLpSBcZFxtS2cYepEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. 

Here we provide pure comments, speculation and opinions concerning the criminal action currently proceeding in Pasco Co, Florida styled as Florida v. JL Riches following a July 2, 2026 hearing before Judge Justice. Link to our YT Channel Community Page discussed herein:https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxCdJLZS7alSOMXufEdc0dZG4oId-rgMDVEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#Idaho4#FreeSpeech#FreePress#FLvRiches#DueProcess #SpeedyTrial

n February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we provide an update regarding the Respondents response to the Petition alleging violations of the Idaho Public Records Act on or before July 10, 2026. One of the items sought is the December 30, 2022 Interogation/Interview video of Mr. Kohberger by Det. Payne and Det. Gilbertson. We ask the rhetorical question if you believe EWU will be successful in obtaining the same, never seen by the public. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculations regarding the process of unsealing the long-closed case by the trial court and also of the status of the court's investigation into the "leak" of under seal documents. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#FreeSpeech#FreePress#IdahovKohberger

In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we note that in one of EWU's public records requests included in the lawsuit is a specific reference to the infamous "8 hour gap" from the times the state alleges the crimes occurred to when the 911 call was placed. In addition to being the court entertaining the EWU public records lawsuit, Judge Marshall also signed off on the warrant for Mr. Kohberger's arrest based on the Dec. 29, 2022 Affidavit of Probable Cause. LINK to our YT channel community page: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxMY9_zlikGtmoilDMY854dtpSVkdEyZgYEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we respond to inquiries asking what specifically with EWU request in their public records requests regarding the 1122 King/Kohberger investigation. Link to our YT Community Page RE: EWU's requests: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxMY9_zlikGtmoilDMY854dtpSVkdEyZgY Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations regarding three (3) things that could be expected to happen if Mr. Kohberger files a Petition for Post Conviction Relief, Citing to ID Code § 19-4906 (2025). LINK to Poll Discussed in this Podcast Episode: https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx3LnUjC9fn_dexwzKUEUL3Z6lteN_NEd0Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#PostConvictionRelief#FreeSpeech#FreePress#BryanKohberger

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the high-profile federal civil lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al. vs. Washington State University. The same has been proceeding since late January 2026 in federal court. The Plaintiffs are the personal representatives of the estates of four students who were catastrophically lost on November 13, 2022 at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho. Here we discuss an important deadline coming up in July regarding the amendment of pleadings. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.#Idaho4#WSU#TitleIX#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the matter styled as Erick Hall v. State of Idaho, a high profile post conviction relief matter denied by Judge Hippler as we continue to monitor the docket for any such PCR filings by Mr. Kohberger as the SOL to do so is rapidly approaching. Please take our poll regarding whether you believe Mr. Kohberger will move for PCR before the SOL expires here:https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx3LnUjC9fn_dexwzKUEUL3Z6lteN_NEd0Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#PostConvictionRelief#FreePress#FreeSpeech #HallvIdaho

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the lack of any evidence Mr. Kohberger has filed a Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, with the one-year statute of limitations continuing to run. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.#Idaho4#PostConvictionRelief#FreeSpeech#FreePress

In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Here we provide an update regarding a key event that is scheduled to occur on July 10, 2026 and others leading up to the hearing on August 5, 2026. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming August 5, 2026 oral argument in the EWU Media v. Moscow/MPD public records lawsuit. Now that Judge Marshall has denied Moscow/MPD's Request to Dismiss the case, what may the public expect to occur in weeks leading up to the hearing on whether there have been violations of the Idaho Public Records Act? EWU v. Moscow/MPD Playlist discussed in this podcast episode:   • The Public Records Act Lawsuit: EWU v. Mos...  Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. First AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠