Analyzing the EPA’s Draft Memorandum on Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 22, 2020 · 23 MIN

Analyzing the EPA’s Draft Memorandum on Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund

from FedSoc Forums · host The Federalist Society

In April, 2020, the United States Supreme Court held that, in certain situations, the Clean Water Act requires Section 402 permits for point source discharges that travel through groundwater to reach navigable waters. According to the Court, a permit is required if the discharge is the "functional equivalent of a direct discharge from the point source into navigable waters." This month, the EPA issued a draft memorandum to help apply the Maui decision and clarify what is required for a "functional equivalent" analysis. What does this draft guidance cover and is it consistent with the Maui decision? Is the guidance helpful to regulated entities and what changes should be considered? Join us as we discuss this critical new guidance that seeks to help to make sense of the Maui decision.Featuring:-- Damien Schiff, Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 22, 2020

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Analyzing the EPA’s Draft Memorandum on Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund

0:00 23:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of FedSoc Forums?

This episode is 23 minutes long.

When was this FedSoc Forums episode published?

This episode was published on December 22, 2020.

Can I download this FedSoc Forums episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!