Beyond a Reasonable Blockchain episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 15, 2026 · 7 MIN

Beyond a Reasonable Blockchain

from Final Notice · host Jason Carr, Esq.

David Gebhardt was a Tennessee-licensed attorney from Brentwood. According to DOJ, he bought cryptocurrency, used decentralized exchanges and nominees to conceal income, and failed to report millions of dollars in income from cryptocurrency sales and his consulting business. From March 2018 through December 2022, DOJ says Gebhardt withdrew approximately $6.6 million from cryptocurrency sales. Despite being warned by his accountants to report all cryptocurrency income, he failed to do so, and on his 2020 through 2022 returns he indicated that he did not engage in virtual currency transactions when he had. Jason explains why the digital asset question on Form 1040 matters, how crypto records can become evidence, and why “I didn’t receive a tax form” is not a defense to failing to report income. The episode also covers the better path: transaction reconstruction, Form 8949, Schedule D, amended returns, payment planning, penalty strategy, and keeping serious tax problems in the civil IRS lane whenever possible. This episode is for taxpayers, business owners, crypto investors, attorneys, accountants, enrolled agents, CPAs, and anyone who has digital asset activity that has not been properly reported. Key Takeaways The IRS digital asset question must be answered accurately. Taxpayers must answer “Yes” or “No” to whether they received, sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of a digital asset during the year. Digital asset income must be reported on the federal tax return. Sales, exchanges, and other dispositions of digital assets held as capital assets generally belong on Form 8949, with totals summarized on Schedule D. Ordinary income from digital assets, including forks, staking, and mining, generally belongs on Schedule 1. Taxpayers must report digital asset income, gains, or losses whether they receive Form 1099-DA or not. When accountants warn a taxpayer to report income, that warning can become a major fact if the taxpayer later files false returns. A prior filing problem is usually easier to fix before IRS-CI is involved. Resources Mentioned DOJ case source: https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdtn/pr/brentwood-attorney-pleads-guilty-tax-fraud IRS digital assets page: https://www.irs.gov/filing/digital-assets IRS digital asset reporting reminder: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/reminders-for-taxpayers-about-digital-assets The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC: https://carrtaxlaw.com Disclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction.Comment PolicyPlease do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 15, 2026

Embed this episode

David Gebhardt was a Tennessee-licensed attorney from Brentwood. According to DOJ, he bought cryptocurrency, used decentralized exchanges and nominees to conceal income, and failed to report millions of dollars in income from cryptocurrency sales and his consulting business. From March 2018 through December 2022, DOJ says Gebhardt withdrew approximately $6.6 million from cryptocurrency sales. Despite being warned by his accountants to report all cryptocurrency income, he failed to do so...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

Ready to play

Beyond a Reasonable Blockchain

0:00 7:42

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Final Notice?

This episode is 7 minutes long.

When was this Final Notice episode published?

This episode was published on June 15, 2026.

Can I download this Final Notice episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!