EPISODE · Jul 30, 2026 · 1 MIN
Case Explained: ANDRICH V. BANNER HEALTH, ET AL.
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-30 Docket: 4:21-cv-00551-JAS The ninth-circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Devin Andrich’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from the failure to release medical records under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The court held that Andrich abandoned any challenge to the district court’s independent, alternative grounds for dismissal—res judicata and failure to state a plausible claim—by failing to raise them in his opening brief. Additionally, the court found no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Andrich’s motions to allow electronic filing and rejected his contentions that the district court violated his constitutional rights. The judgment of the district court remains in effect. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: ANDRICH V. BANNER HEALTH, ET AL.
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.