Case Explained: ANDRICH V. BANNER HEALTH, ET AL. episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 30, 2026 · 1 MIN

Case Explained: ANDRICH V. BANNER HEALTH, ET AL.

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-30 Docket: 4:21-cv-00551-JAS The ninth-circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Devin Andrich’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from the failure to release medical records under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The court held that Andrich abandoned any challenge to the district court’s independent, alternative grounds for dismissal—res judicata and failure to state a plausible claim—by failing to raise them in his opening brief. Additionally, the court found no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Andrich’s motions to allow electronic filing and rejected his contentions that the district court violated his constitutional rights. The judgment of the district court remains in effect. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 30, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: ANDRICH V. BANNER HEALTH, ET AL.

0:00 1:49

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 1 minute long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 30, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!