EPISODE · Aug 13, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: ARTHUR JONES v. WARDEN BUCKINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-08-13 The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on Arthur Jones’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The court applied the standard under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), which requires a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” to issue a certificate of appealability. Specifically, the court determined that Jones failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Consequently, no relief was granted, and the appeal was terminated without oral argument. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: ARTHUR JONES v. WARDEN BUCKINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.