Case Explained: ARTHUR JONES v. WARDEN BUCKINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 13, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: ARTHUR JONES v. WARDEN BUCKINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-08-13 The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on Arthur Jones’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The court applied the standard under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), which requires a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” to issue a certificate of appealability. Specifically, the court determined that Jones failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Consequently, no relief was granted, and the appeal was terminated without oral argument. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 13, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: ARTHUR JONES v. WARDEN BUCKINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

0:00 0:43

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 13, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!