EPISODE · Jul 30, 2026 · 1 MIN
Case Explained: BARTHA V. STATE OF ARIZONA
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-30 Docket: 2:24-cv-02478-ROS–JZB The ninth-circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Bartha’s § 1983 action against the State of Arizona as barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity. The court applied de novo review and held that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal suits against unconsenting states regardless of the relief sought, and that a state is not a “person” subject to suit under § 1983. The court declined to consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. The judgment of the district court stands. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: BARTHA V. STATE OF ARIZONA
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.