Case Explained: BARTHA V. STATE OF ARIZONA episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 30, 2026 · 1 MIN

Case Explained: BARTHA V. STATE OF ARIZONA

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-30 Docket: 2:24-cv-02478-ROS–JZB The ninth-circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Bartha’s § 1983 action against the State of Arizona as barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity. The court applied de novo review and held that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal suits against unconsenting states regardless of the relief sought, and that a state is not a “person” subject to suit under § 1983. The court declined to consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. The judgment of the district court stands. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 30, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: BARTHA V. STATE OF ARIZONA

0:00 1:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 1 minute long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 30, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!