Case Explained: BRANDEN D. HARGROVE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 29, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: BRANDEN D. HARGROVE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-29 The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s orders dismissing Branden D. Hargrove’s civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, as well as the denial of his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court. As a result, the district court’s dismissals stand, and the case is concluded without further proceedings. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 29, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: BRANDEN D. HARGROVE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

0:00 0:51

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 29, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!