EPISODE · Jul 23, 2026 · 1 MIN
Case Explained: CARACCIOLO v. FDIC
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Filed: 2026-07-23 The federal-circuit transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina because it lacks jurisdiction over discrimination claims. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2), federal district courts, not the Federal Circuit, hold jurisdiction over cases involving allegations of discrimination under 5 U.S.C. § 7702, including claims based on race, age, or prior equal employment opportunity activity. Citing *Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.* and *Diggs v. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.*, the court determined that because the petitioner continues to pursue these discrimination claims following her appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, the matter must be heard in district court. Consequently, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, all case filings and the matter itself were transferred to the appropriate district court where the employment action occurred. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: CARACCIOLO v. FDIC
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.