Case Explained: CARACCIOLO v. FDIC episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 23, 2026 · 1 MIN

Case Explained: CARACCIOLO v. FDIC

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Filed: 2026-07-23 The federal-circuit transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina because it lacks jurisdiction over discrimination claims. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2), federal district courts, not the Federal Circuit, hold jurisdiction over cases involving allegations of discrimination under 5 U.S.C. § 7702, including claims based on race, age, or prior equal employment opportunity activity. Citing *Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.* and *Diggs v. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.*, the court determined that because the petitioner continues to pursue these discrimination claims following her appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, the matter must be heard in district court. Consequently, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, all case filings and the matter itself were transferred to the appropriate district court where the employment action occurred. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 23, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: CARACCIOLO v. FDIC

0:00 1:30

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 1 minute long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 23, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!