Case Explained: Charles L. Burgett v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 13, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Charles L. Burgett v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-08-13 The eighth-circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in Charles Burgett’s employment discrimination action against the Commissioner of Social Security. The court applied a de novo standard of review to the summary judgment ruling, citing *Said v. Mayo Clinic*, and found the lower court’s decision proper based on its review of the record and arguments. Additionally, the court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Burgett’s motion for reconsideration, applying the standard outlined in *Ryan v. Ryan*. Consequently, the judgment of the district court remains in effect, and the appeal is dismissed with no further relief granted to the appellant. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 13, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Charles L. Burgett v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

0:00 0:41

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 13, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!