EPISODE · Jul 27, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: CRYSTAL CZERNO v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MONSANTO COMPANY; SOLUTIA, INC.; PHARMACIA LLC; BAYER, AG; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LP; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS US LLC; SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CORP., (SABIC); GE PLASTICS
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: 2026-07-27 The First Circuit issued an erratum sheet to amend its opinion issued on July 14, 2026, in the case of Czereno v. General Electric Company et al. The court directed a clerical correction on page 25, footnote 10, line 4, replacing the word “district” with “district court.” This administrative order clarifies the text of the prior opinion without altering the court’s substantive holding or disposition. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
Ready to play
Case Explained: CRYSTAL CZERNO v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MONSANTO COMPANY; SOLUTIA, INC.; PHARMACIA LLC; BAYER, AG; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LP; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS US LLC; SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CORP., (SABIC); GE PLASTICS
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.