EPISODE · Jul 30, 2026 · 1 MIN
Case Explained: HOLLINS v. MSPB
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Filed: 2026-07-30 The federal-circuit dismissed the petition for review due to the petitioner’s failure to timely file the Statement Concerning Discrimination on Federal Circuit Form 10, as required by Fed. Cir. R. 15(c)(3), and the docketing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, as required by Fed. Cir. R. 52(d). The court also granted the United States Postal Service’s motion to modify the caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), because the Board dismissed the underlying appeal for lack of jurisdiction rather than reaching the merits of the personnel action. The practical consequence is that the petition is dismissed without prejudice to correcting these procedural deficiencies. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: HOLLINS v. MSPB
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.