Case Explained: In re STEPHEN NIVENS episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 27, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: In re STEPHEN NIVENS

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-27 The fourth-circuit dismissed Stephen Nivens’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction and declined to transfer the case to the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1631. The court applied the standard established in *Dragenice v. Ridge*, 389 F.3d 92, 100 (4th Cir. 2004), determining that it lacked authority to hear the petition and that transfer was not appropriate. Consequently, the petition is dismissed without a decision on the merits, and no further relief is granted or transferred for district court review. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 27, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: In re STEPHEN NIVENS

0:00 0:40

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 27, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!