Case Explained: JAIMES SOLANO V. BLANCHE episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 10, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: JAIMES SOLANO V. BLANCHE

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-08-10 The ninth-circuit dismissed the petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of a third motion to reopen. While the court retains jurisdiction to review BIA decisions denying sua sponte reopening motions solely to check for legal or constitutional error, it found that the petitioner failed to identify any such error in the agency’s reasoning regarding the Department of Homeland Security’s lack of opposition or factors related to diligence. Additionally, the court noted that while it has jurisdiction over claims regarding equitable tolling of numerical limitations on motions to reopen under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, the petitioner failed to exhaust this specific issue before the BIA. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, though the temporary stay of removal remains in effect until the mandate issues. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 10, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: JAIMES SOLANO V. BLANCHE

0:00 0:58

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 10, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!