Case Explained: Joseph Anthony Reyna Plaintiff— v. Spotify Technology, S.A.; Spotify USA, Incorporated; DistroKid, Incorporated; Does 1–10 Defendants—

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-02 The fifth-circuit granted Joseph Reyna’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal but affirmed the district court’s dismissal of his civil action. The court determined that while Reyna raised a nonfrivolous issue regarding the dismissal for want of subject matter jurisdiction, he failed to demonstrate error in the district court’s conclusion that his complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Applying the standard from *Ashcroft v. Iqbal*, which requires complaints to state a plausible claim for relief rather than mere legal conclusions, the court found Reyna cited no authority requiring specific explanations of deficiencies and failed to show how his factual assertions satisfied applicable statutes. Additionally, the court rejected Reyna’s argument that he was denied leave to amend, noting the magistrate judge provided notice of defects and Reyna had already pleaded his best case. Consequently, Reyna is permitted to proceed without prepaying fees, but the underlying dismissal stands, and all other pending motions are denied. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.