Case Explained: JOSEPH R. THAMES v. SANDHILLS PICK N PULL; SEVIKINANDNA MCKETHEAN episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 29, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: JOSEPH R. THAMES v. SANDHILLS PICK N PULL; SEVIKINANDNA MCKETHEAN

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-29 The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s order dismissing Joseph R. Thames’s pro se civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court reviewed the record and determined that no reversible error occurred in the lower court’s decision to grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The opinion notes that while Thames mentioned an order denying his motion for reconsideration in his brief, he failed to file a separate notice of appeal or amend his existing notice to include that specific order, thereby precluding appellate review of that ruling under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4)(B)(ii). Consequently, the district court’s dismissal stands, and the case is remanded with no further action required by this court. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 29, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: JOSEPH R. THAMES v. SANDHILLS PICK N PULL; SEVIKINANDNA MCKETHEAN

0:00 0:52

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 29, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!