EPISODE · Jun 17, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: LINDA CRAWFORD v. SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY; SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, through its President, Dr. Kellie J. Armstrong; JAMES G. MITCHELL, Chair, SRU Department of Modern Languages and President, Salve Regina AAUP CCHP; ESTHER ALARCON-ARANA Faculty, SRU Department of Modern Languages; EMILY COLBERT-CAIRNS, Faculty, SRU Department of Modern Languages
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: 2026-06-17 The First Circuit issued an errata sheet to amend its opinion issued on June 11, 2026, in the case of Crawford v. Salve Regina University. The court directed specific textual corrections: deleting the word “claims” on page 13, line 12; replacing the first instance of “of” with “or” on page 19, line 8; and inserting “, a plaintiff” after “statute” on page 24, line 7. These administrative actions clarify the record without altering the court’s substantive holding or disposition regarding the underlying dispute. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
Ready to play
Case Explained: LINDA CRAWFORD v. SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY; SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, through its President, Dr. Kellie J. Armstrong; JAMES G. MITCHELL, Chair, SRU Department of Modern Languages and President, Salve Regina AAUP CCHP; ESTHER ALARCON-ARANA Faculty, SRU Department of Modern Languages; EMILY COLBERT-CAIRNS, Faculty, SRU Department of Modern Languages
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.