Case Explained: MARCEL ROMAINS WALLACE v. RENETTA BUTTS; WANDA BAZEMORE

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-23 The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s order denying relief on Marcel Romains Wallace’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, concluding that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court to justify dispensing with oral argument. As a result, Wallace’s motion for oral argument was denied, and the district court’s judgment stands without further proceedings. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.