Case Explained: MAURICE BRISCOE v. PATHIK RAMI; SAFE ASSET GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and MERRILL COHEN Trustee episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 4, 2026

Case Explained: MAURICE BRISCOE v. PATHIK RAMI; SAFE ASSET GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and MERRILL COHEN Trustee

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host Do It For The Caselaw

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-04 The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s order dismissing Maurice Briscoe’s bankruptcy appeal. The court limited its review to the issues raised in Briscoe’s informal brief pursuant to Fourth Circuit Rule 34(b) and *Jackson v. Lightsey*, concluding that there was no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal based on the record before it. Additionally, the court denied Briscoe’s motion for a stay pending appeal as moot and dispensed with oral argument. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 4, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: MAURICE BRISCOE v. PATHIK RAMI; SAFE ASSET GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and MERRILL COHEN Trustee

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 4, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!