Case Explained: MCNALLY V. LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER, ET AL. episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 26, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: MCNALLY V. LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER, ET AL.

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-26 Docket: 2:23-cv-08094-MEMF-PD The ninth-circuit affirmed the district court’s order dismissing Michelle McNally’s action to enforce a state decision regarding workers’ compensation benefits. The court declined to review the specific grounds for dismissal relied upon by the district court because McNally, proceeding pro se, failed to challenge those grounds in her opening brief; under Ninth Circuit precedent, issues not supported by argument in an appellant’s opening brief are deemed abandoned. Consequently, the appellate court exercised its jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to affirm the dismissal without addressing the merits of the underlying claim, and all pending motions were denied. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 26, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: MCNALLY V. LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER, ET AL.

0:00 0:52

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 26, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!