Case Explained: NEWLIN V. LAKESIDE PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, PLLC, ET AL. episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 30, 2026 · 1 MIN

Case Explained: NEWLIN V. LAKESIDE PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, PLLC, ET AL.

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-30 Docket: 2:24-cv-00539-AKB The ninth circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of James Newlin’s federal and state law claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) based on claim preclusion. The court applied a de novo standard of review and held that the dismissal was proper because Newlin raised, or could have raised, his claims in a prior action involving the same parties or their privies that resulted in a final judgment on the merits. Consequently, the district court’s judgment remains in effect, and any arguments not specifically and distinctly raised in the opening brief are deemed waived. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 30, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: NEWLIN V. LAKESIDE PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, PLLC, ET AL.

0:00 1:10

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 1 minute long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 30, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!