EPISODE · Jul 30, 2026 · 1 MIN
Case Explained: NEWLIN V. LAKESIDE PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, PLLC, ET AL.
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-30 Docket: 2:24-cv-00539-AKB The ninth circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of James Newlin’s federal and state law claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) based on claim preclusion. The court applied a de novo standard of review and held that the dismissal was proper because Newlin raised, or could have raised, his claims in a prior action involving the same parties or their privies that resulted in a final judgment on the merits. Consequently, the district court’s judgment remains in effect, and any arguments not specifically and distinctly raised in the opening brief are deemed waived. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: NEWLIN V. LAKESIDE PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, PLLC, ET AL.
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.