EPISODE · Aug 11, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY KENNETH GRIFFIN
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-08-11 Docket: 2:25-cr-00158-CLM-NAD-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirmed the defendant’s convictions and sentence. The court applied the standard established in *Anders v. California*, conducting an independent review of the entire record to verify counsel’s assessment that the appeal lacked arguable issues of merit. Because this examination revealed no meritorious grounds for reversal, the court denied relief and upheld the district court’s judgment. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY KENNETH GRIFFIN
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.