Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY KENNETH GRIFFIN episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 11, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY KENNETH GRIFFIN

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-08-11 Docket: 2:25-cr-00158-CLM-NAD-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirmed the defendant’s convictions and sentence. The court applied the standard established in *Anders v. California*, conducting an independent review of the entire record to verify counsel’s assessment that the appeal lacked arguable issues of merit. Because this examination revealed no meritorious grounds for reversal, the court denied relief and upheld the district court’s judgment. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 11, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY KENNETH GRIFFIN

0:00 0:42

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 11, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!