EPISODE · Jun 23, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL DEMARCUS GOLDEN
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-06-23 Docket: 4:24-cr-00066-JRH-CLR-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representing the appellant and affirmed the defendant’s conviction and sentence. The court applied the standard established in *Anders v. California*, conducting an independent review of the trial record to assess the appeal’s merit. Finding no arguable issues of merit, the court concluded that counsel’s assessment was correct and issued a summary affirmation without oral argument. As a result, the defendant’s conviction and sentence from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia remain in effect. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL DEMARCUS GOLDEN
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.