Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL DEMARCUS GOLDEN episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 23, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL DEMARCUS GOLDEN

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-06-23 Docket: 4:24-cr-00066-JRH-CLR-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representing the appellant and affirmed the defendant’s conviction and sentence. The court applied the standard established in *Anders v. California*, conducting an independent review of the trial record to assess the appeal’s merit. Finding no arguable issues of merit, the court concluded that counsel’s assessment was correct and issued a summary affirmation without oral argument. As a result, the defendant’s conviction and sentence from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia remain in effect. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 23, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL DEMARCUS GOLDEN

0:00 0:43

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 23, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!