Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DUBER DARIO TORRES TAPIAS episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 17, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DUBER DARIO TORRES TAPIAS

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-08-17 Docket: 8:24-cr-00473-WFJ-NHA-5 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw under the standard established in *Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), after conducting an independent review of the entire record. The court determined that no arguable issues of merit existed in the appeal, confirming counsel’s assessment that the case lacked legal grounds for reversal. Consequently, the court affirmed Duber Dario Torres Tapias’s conviction and sentence. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 17, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DUBER DARIO TORRES TAPIAS

0:00 0:38

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 17, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!