EPISODE · Aug 17, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DUBER DARIO TORRES TAPIAS
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-08-17 Docket: 8:24-cr-00473-WFJ-NHA-5 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw under the standard established in *Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), after conducting an independent review of the entire record. The court determined that no arguable issues of merit existed in the appeal, confirming counsel’s assessment that the case lacked legal grounds for reversal. Consequently, the court affirmed Duber Dario Torres Tapias’s conviction and sentence. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DUBER DARIO TORRES TAPIAS
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.