EPISODE · Aug 13, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JELYSSA RENEA WASHINGTON
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-08-13 Docket: 5:21-cr-00033-JA-PRL-5 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of the appellant pursuant to *Anders v. California* and affirmed the district court’s denial of the appellant’s motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Following an independent review of the entire record, the court determined that counsel’s assessment regarding the lack of merit in the appeal was correct, as no arguable issues were identified. Consequently, the district court’s original order denying the sentence reduction remains in effect. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JELYSSA RENEA WASHINGTON
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.