Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JELYSSA RENEA WASHINGTON episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 13, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JELYSSA RENEA WASHINGTON

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-08-13 Docket: 5:21-cr-00033-JA-PRL-5 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of the appellant pursuant to *Anders v. California* and affirmed the district court’s denial of the appellant’s motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Following an independent review of the entire record, the court determined that counsel’s assessment regarding the lack of merit in the appeal was correct, as no arguable issues were identified. Consequently, the district court’s original order denying the sentence reduction remains in effect. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 13, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JELYSSA RENEA WASHINGTON

0:00 0:41

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 13, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!