Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH H. BURKE, JR episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 28, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH H. BURKE, JR

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-28 Docket: 8:11-cr-00181-SDM-AAS-1 The eleventh-circuit affirmed Kenneth H. Burke, Jr.’s sentences imposed after postconviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 vacated one of his convictions. The court granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to *Anders v. California* after conducting an independent review of the entire record and finding no arguable issues of merit. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 28, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH H. BURKE, JR

0:00 0:42

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 28, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!