EPISODE · Jun 22, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNEY LEE WATSON
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-06-22 Docket: 3:24-cr-00073-TKW-1 The eleventh-circuit granted the motion of appointed counsel to withdraw from representing Kenney Watson on appeal, following a review conducted pursuant to *Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The court applied the standard requiring an independent examination of the entire record to determine if any issues of arguable merit exist. Finding no such issues, the court affirmed Watson’s conviction and sentence. As a practical consequence, counsel is permitted to withdraw from the case, and the judgment of the District Court for the Northern District of Florida stands as final. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNEY LEE WATSON
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.