Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 17, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-06-17 Docket: 6:19-cr-00082-RBD-LHP-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirmed the defendant’s revocation sentence following an independent review of the entire record pursuant to *Anders v. California*. The court determined that, after examining the case file, no arguable issues of merit existed to support the appeal. Consequently, the court upheld the district court’s judgment without addressing any substantive legal arguments, as none were found to be viable under the applicable standard for Anders briefs. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 17, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH

0:00 0:41

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 17, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!