EPISODE · Jun 17, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-06-17 Docket: 6:19-cr-00082-RBD-LHP-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirmed the defendant’s revocation sentence following an independent review of the entire record pursuant to *Anders v. California*. The court determined that, after examining the case file, no arguable issues of merit existed to support the appeal. Consequently, the court upheld the district court’s judgment without addressing any substantive legal arguments, as none were found to be viable under the applicable standard for Anders briefs. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.