Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 16, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-06-16 Docket: 6:25-cr-00013-RBD-LHP-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation and affirmed the defendant’s conviction and sentence. The court conducted an independent review of the entire record pursuant to *Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and determined that counsel’s assessment regarding the lack of merit in the appeal was correct, finding no arguable issues of merit upon examination. Consequently, the court affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the Middle District of Florida without argument, leaving the conviction and sentence in place. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 16, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH

0:00 0:41

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 16, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!