EPISODE · Jun 16, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-06-16 Docket: 6:25-cr-00013-RBD-LHP-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation and affirmed the defendant’s conviction and sentence. The court conducted an independent review of the entire record pursuant to *Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and determined that counsel’s assessment regarding the lack of merit in the appeal was correct, finding no arguable issues of merit upon examination. Consequently, the court affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the Middle District of Florida without argument, leaving the conviction and sentence in place. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAURICE DEVANTAY KIMBROUGH
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.