Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROY FRANCIS LABARE episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 7, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROY FRANCIS LABARE

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-08-07 Docket: 6:25-cr-00129-JA-LHP-1 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation and affirmed the defendant’s convictions and sentence. The court conducted an independent review of the entire record pursuant to *Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738 (1976), and determined that no arguable issues of merit existed in the appeal. Consequently, the court found counsel’s assessment correct and proceeded to affirm the judgment without argument. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 7, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROY FRANCIS LABARE

0:00 0:37

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 7, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!