Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAKIRA JANAE ENGLISH episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 27, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAKIRA JANAE ENGLISH

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-27 Docket: 2:24-cr-00045-AMM-SGC-1 The eleventh-circuit granted the motion of appointed counsel to withdraw from representation in this direct criminal appeal and affirmed the defendant’s convictions and sentences. The court applied the standard established in *Anders v. California*, conducting an independent review of the entire record to verify counsel’s assessment that the appeal lacks arguable merit. Finding no issues of merit upon independent examination, the court denied any further appellate arguments on behalf of the appellant while simultaneously upholding the district court’s judgment. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 27, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAKIRA JANAE ENGLISH

0:00 0:40

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 27, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!