Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEOPILO BARRIES MUNOZ episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 2, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEOPILO BARRIES MUNOZ

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-02 Docket: 8:20-cr-00201-CEH-SPF-4 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation under the standard established in *Anders v. California*, following an independent review of the record that revealed no arguable issues of merit. Consequently, the court affirmed the district court’s denial of the appellant’s motions to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 2, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEOPILO BARRIES MUNOZ

0:00 0:42

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 2, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!