EPISODE · Jul 2, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEOPILO BARRIES MUNOZ
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-02 Docket: 8:20-cr-00201-CEH-SPF-4 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation under the standard established in *Anders v. California*, following an independent review of the record that revealed no arguable issues of merit. Consequently, the court affirmed the district court’s denial of the appellant’s motions to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEOPILO BARRIES MUNOZ
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.