EPISODE · Jun 17, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: RORIE v. COLLINS
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Filed: 2026-06-17 The federal-circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the appellant’s arguments challenged the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ application of law to fact, which is beyond the Federal Circuit’s statutory authority. Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2), the court lacks jurisdiction to review factual determinations or the application of law to specific facts in appeals from the Veterans Court. The appellant attempted to argue that a 1985 VA examination report constituted an informal claim for an increased disability rating, but this issue was forfeited at the Veterans Court level because it was not raised in the opening brief. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed without consideration of the merits, and no costs are awarded. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: RORIE v. COLLINS
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
May 9, 2026 ·49m
May 2, 2026 ·49m
Apr 25, 2026 ·49m
Apr 21, 2026 ·13m
Apr 19, 2026 ·16m
Apr 18, 2026 ·49m