Case Explained: SALOME J. JOHNSON v. BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 12, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: SALOME J. JOHNSON v. BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-08-12 The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Salome Johnson’s amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, applying the *Feres* doctrine established in *Feres v. United States*, 340 U.S. 135 (1950). The court determined that the record contained no reversible error regarding the application of this rule, which generally bars service members from suing the government for injuries incident to service. Consequently, the judgment dismissing the case is upheld, and oral argument was dispensed with as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the written materials. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 12, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: SALOME J. JOHNSON v. BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER

0:00 0:53

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 12, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!