Case Explained: SERENITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. V. SUN HUNG KAI STRATEGIC CAPITAL, LTD., ET AL. episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 29, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: SERENITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. V. SUN HUNG KAI STRATEGIC CAPITAL, LTD., ET AL.

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-29 Docket: 4:22-cv-01623- The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of third-party defendants Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and Scenic Advisement, Inc., holding that under California law, conversion is a strict liability tort for which equitable indemnity is available against negligent joint tortfeasors. The court reasoned that because conversion does not require proof of wrongful intent or motive, it lacks the social condemnation associated with intentional torts like fraud or battery, thereby permitting apportionment of liability under California’s comparative fault principles. Consequently, the case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with this ruling. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 29, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: SERENITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. V. SUN HUNG KAI STRATEGIC CAPITAL, LTD., ET AL.

0:00 0:48

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 29, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!