Case Explained: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA v. JAPHETH ASHLEY HUTCHINSON episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 23, 2026 · 1 MIN

Case Explained: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA v. JAPHETH ASHLEY HUTCHINSON

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-23 The fourth-circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that a district court’s order remanding a removed case to state court based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction is generally not reviewable on appeal. The court applied the statutory bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), which prohibits appellate review of such remand orders, citing Fourth Circuit precedent confirming that these orders are unreviewable even when made sua sponte. As a practical consequence, the dismissal is final, leaving the district court’s order remanding the case to state court in effect and ending the federal appellate proceedings. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 23, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA v. JAPHETH ASHLEY HUTCHINSON

0:00 1:26

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 1 minute long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 23, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!