Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Marcellus Holmes Defendant— episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 5, 2026

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Marcellus Holmes Defendant—

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host Do It For The Caselaw

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-05 The fifth-circuit granted the appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal after reviewing the Anders brief and the appellant’s response. The court applied the standard set forth in *Anders v. California* and *United States v. Flores*, concluding that the record contained no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review. Consequently, the counsel was excused from further responsibilities and the case was dismissed without addressing the merits of the underlying criminal conviction. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 5, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Marcellus Holmes Defendant—

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 5, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!