Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Samuel David Sanford, III Defendant— episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 28, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Samuel David Sanford, III Defendant—

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-28 The Fifth Circuit granted the appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal. The court applied the standard established in *Anders v. California* and *United States v. Flores*, concluding that after reviewing the record, counsel had identified no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review and the defendant had not filed a response. As a practical consequence, counsel was excused from further responsibilities in the case and the appeal was dismissed without prejudice to the defendant filing a pro se brief. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 28, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Samuel David Sanford, III Defendant—

0:00 0:39

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 28, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!