Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARNEL HATEGEKIMANA episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 7, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARNEL HATEGEKIMANA

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-08-07 The Fourth Circuit affirmed Arnel Hategekimana’s conviction on six counts stemming from a controlled purchase of narcotics following a bench trial. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hategekimana’s motion to suppress evidence without an evidentiary hearing and in admitting certain testimony at trial. Applying a review for reversible error, the court found no such error in the lower court’s rulings and therefore affirmed the judgment, dispensing with oral argument as the record and legal contentions were adequately presented. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 7, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARNEL HATEGEKIMANA

0:00 0:43

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 7, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!