Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 28, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-28 The fourth-circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of a certificate of appealability (COA). The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) and § 2253(c)(2), which require a COA to proceed with an appeal from the denial of a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The court determined that Hobbs failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, meaning reasonable jurists could not find the district court’s assessment debatable or wrong. Consequently, the court denied the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal without oral argument. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 28, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS

0:00 0:43

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 28, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!