EPISODE · Jul 28, 2026 · 1 MIN
Case Explained: United States of America v. Lance Quintin Longie
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-28 The eighth-circuit affirmed the defendant’s conviction for failure to register as a sex offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). The court held that the district court properly excluded testimony and refused to instruct the jury on the statutory affirmative defense under 18 U.S.C. § 2250(c) because the defendant failed to produce sufficient evidence to establish the required elements. Applying a plain meaning analysis derived from the Bail Reform Act, the court defined “uncontrollable circumstances” as events that actually prevent compliance, rather than those that merely discourage it. The court found the defendant’s testimony regarding alleged harassment and threats insufficient to show he was physically prevented from registering for 632 days or that he complied as soon as such circumstances ceased. Consequently, the conviction stands and the defendant remains subject to his sentence. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: United States of America v. Lance Quintin Longie
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.