Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OCTAVIOUS ARTIS episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 24, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OCTAVIOUS ARTIS

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-24 The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal filed by Octavious Artis regarding his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and motion to alter or amend judgment. The court held that an appeal from a denial of relief under § 2255 is not permissible without a certificate of appealability, which requires a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Under the standard established in *Buck v. Davis* and *Gonzalez v. Thaler*, Artis failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Consequently, no certificate was issued, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without oral argument. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 24, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OCTAVIOUS ARTIS

0:00 0:42

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 24, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!